dark light

Lyffe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 278 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Handley Page 0/400 or Stonehenge #1231232
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Cking,

    My interest is really in meteorological history and this particular story is about a unit for which the Met Office has no record at all. My target magazine is ‘Weather’ published by the Royal Meteorological Society, but I’d be more than happy to email you a copy in due course – I try and write so there is something of interest for a wider audience than just meteorologists so hopefull it won’t send you to sleep.

    Brian

    in reply to: Handley Page 0/400 or Stonehenge #1231610
    Lyffe
    Participant

    A photo of a HP 0/400 (C9689) flown by the No 1 SoAN&BD at Stonehenge now acquired, but still would appreciate a photo of the airfield.

    Brian

    in reply to: Bovingdon AAF Station 112 #1237033
    Lyffe
    Participant

    That’s the one Dave; my interest in it being that it was carrying a MAO, Sgt John Edward Bartle Pye. Aged 18 he must have been on one of his first operational sorties and was the youngest MAO to die.

    An ALLAH sortie started at Trevose Head then took a track of 270 deg for about 700 miles, before turning ENE for the next 300, then returning to Trevose Head. The aircraft would have flown legs 1 and 3 at 1800 ft with observations being made every 50 miles, but at every fourth position a descent would be made to about 100 ft (depending on the conditions) for the MAO to measure the pressure. After that fourth observation the data were normally transmitted to base. This sequence was repeated throughout the flight, except on the second leg which was flown at 18000 ft.

    The procedure was clearly very dangerous, especially at night, with strong winds and big waves (which there almost certainly were on this occasion with wind speeds in excess of 30-35 mph). Since no message was sent, it is possible that in this instance the aircraft descended too low and hit the sea 200 miles west of Trevose Head.

    Alternatively the aircraft’s communications might have failed and the loss occurred further out in the Atlantic. All suppostion, but I know of one aircraft that flew so low in poor visibility that it only just missed the Queen Mary!

    Although the CWGC gives Pye’s death as being on 3 Feb, I’m convinced in my own mind the accident occerred on the 2nd.

    Brian

    in reply to: Bovingdon AAF Station 112 #1237757
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Dave,

    The story actually begins a while earlier, during the summer of 1943 at St Eval, when 1404 Met Flight became 517 Squadron and began re-equipping with Halifaxes. Because of this 517 was unable to maintain its operational committment of twice-daily meteorological reconnaissance sorties to the southwest over Biscay (code-named EPICURE). Such was the importance of these flights that the Americans offered four B-17s of the USAAF 379th Bomb Squadron to make up the shortfall – adding another four aircraft later.

    Initially these were detached to St Eval and operated to the west of the UK (code-named ALLAH), but during the autumn it was decided the American aircraft should operate from an American base – Bovingdon.

    As the Americans had no aircrew trained in met observing the crews always flew with an RAF Meteorological Air Observer (MAO), and when the detachment returned to Bovingdon they were accompanied by seven MAOs under the command of Flt Lt H J J (John) Leigh-Clare.

    Leigh-Clare was the MAO on 42-37744 when it crashed just outside the airfield boundary whilst departing for an ALLAH sortie on the evening of 9 December 1943.

    The crash was witnessed by a ten year old boy, Roy Payne, and over the years he kept returning to the crash site, collecting small pieces of debris. Fortythree years after the accident (1976) he found two gold rings; one was a pilot’s ring inscribed with the name William Holcom, the other was a Bombadier’s ring inscribed with the intials HJ. 2nd Lt Holcomb was the co-pilot of 42-37744, and in 2003 Roy eventually traced the American’s family and returned the ring to them. My source is John Taylor, Holcomb’s nephew, who also wrote an account of his uncle’s life.

    Which brings us to the second ring. The initials did not match those any of the American crew-members nor, as far as could be determined, any of those who dealt with the aftermath of the crash – which is where I come in.

    Peter Davies (Resmorah) and myself have been compiling a Book of Remembrance for all the meteorologists who died during the war – one of whom was H J J Leigh-Clare – and John Taylor wondered if, somehow, the ring was his. I was in contact with one of Leigh-Clare’s cousins and made enquiries within the family. In the event it turned out there was no connection (there shouldn’t have been as Bombardier rings are American, but it was thought possible it might have been given him as a mark of respect), so there the story ends.

    I hope your intrigue is satisfied.

    Do you have anything on B-17F 42-30131, lost flying an ALLAH sortie on 3 February 1944?

    Brian

    in reply to: Bovingdon AAF Station 112 #1238076
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Ah – but there’s more to the story, it doesn’t end until 2003!

    Brian

    in reply to: Bovingdon AAF Station 112 #1238396
    Lyffe
    Participant

    B-17G (42-37744)

    Dave,

    No photos I’m afraid, but do you have anything on B-17G (42-37744) that crashed on take-off at 1856 hours on 9 December 1943? If not I might be able to help. It was the start of a weather reconnaissance flight and one of the crew was a British Met Air Observer, Flt Lt H H J (John) Leigh-Clare.

    Brian

    in reply to: Ireland's Secret WWII airfields (2005 Zombie) #1172328
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Earlier in this thread there were a number of references to the met flights made from Baldonnel during the war, and of the data being broadcast to the RAF. I think there were at least two requests for source of this statement but none has been forthcoming.

    I have an interest in this subject as I’m (slowly) compiling a history of the RAF Met Flights (not the Reconnaissance Squadrons which were totally different). Single seat aircraft of the RAF Met Flights made thrice daily vertical ascents over their base stations recording a variety of met data; so far as I’m aware this information was never broadcast from the aircraft by radio as a number of computations had to be made on the ground before it was ready for use.

    Aircraft from Baldonnel made similar ascents, in their case once daily, but it would have still been necessary for the aircraft to land before the data were disemminated.

    Thanks to Tony (Kearns) I’ve seen documents from the Military Archives in Dublin, and although these imply the data from the met ascents were made available to the British military, there is no definite statement confirming this. Had the data been made available it would have found its way to the Central Forecast Office at Dunstable for plotting on upper air charts, but although I’ve seen a fair number of these in the Met Office Archives I’ve yet to see anything plotted over Baldonnel. I’ve also been fortunate to talk to a number of people who would have plotted the data had they been available, but none can remember anything coming from Eire other than the upper air radio-sonde data from Valentia.

    So, can we ask the question again of those who state the data were broadcast to the RAF – what is the source of the statement. I’d love it to be true but nothing I’ve seen as yet has convinced me.

    Brian

    in reply to: Photo's of an RAF career 1930's to 1960's ! #1181698
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Met Halifax

    Reference Keith’s post at 18.54 on 1 December, the missing Halifax was 202 Squadron’s ST807. It disappeared near 55N 12W whilst on a routine met flight on 18 April 1947.

    Brian

    in reply to: Akrotiri U2 accident on 7 December 1977 #1205281
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Contacting you off -board.

    Brian

    in reply to: Akrotiri U2 accident on 7 December 1977 #1205834
    Lyffe
    Participant

    I can understand that BD, but if that is the case why did you post the description of the accident. That implied the fatalities were incidental, they weren’t. I’ve read all the Prune posts and can only express my total disgust at the light-hearted way many of the contributors have written. Sorry, that’s the way I see it, I’d left Cyprus not long before and although I was not there those men were my colleagues.

    Brian

    in reply to: Akrotiri U2 accident on 7 December 1977 #1206028
    Lyffe
    Participant

    For what it’s worth gentlemen the Akrotiri ORB covering 1975-80 was released earlier this year (AIR28/2170). An appendix for the day in question briefly describes the accident, but obviously makes no attempt to explain the cause. However, the file does contain pictures of the accident site shortly after the crash – as an ex-forecaster myself (Episkopi not Akrotiri) I was shocked at how little remained of the met office.

    BD. The reference to catching the Cypriot civilian staff in the car park is, I feel, incorrect. Four Cypriots were killed, all working in the met office, as was the forecaster, Jack Flawn.

    Brian

    in reply to: T.H.U.M Flight? #1207603
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Estella,

    I would be extremely interested in talking to you as I’m compiling a history of the RFC/RAF Meteorological Flights and THUM Flight. As I posted earlier in this thread they go back to February 1918 so they have a long history. I’ve been fortunate in tracing the son of the second OC of the 1918 RFC/RAF Met Flight so I have some unique photos from that time. Through the kindness of members of this forum I have some photos of the THUM Flight aircraft, but I’m always on the outlook for more information.

    Perhaps you could email me off-board.

    Oops, just realised my address is not on my profile, it’s monbrythATaolDOTcom

    Brian

    in reply to: WW2 night formation flying #1216966
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Unfortunate there’s a metman around – we get blamed for an awful lot. Tide and moon data are and were common knowledge and the Met Office wouldn’t have been consulted.

    As an aside, moon and tide considerations determined that Operation BITING, the raid on Bruneval in 1942, could only take place between 23 and 26 February. Unfortunately the weather didn’t play ball but during the early hours of the 27th, after BITING was technically called off, the forecasters advised that weatherwise the coming night (27/28th) would be ideal. In the event the raid was completed successfully outside the optimum period.

    But I digress away from the original subject of the thread …. .

    Brian

    in reply to: WW2 night formation flying #1217407
    Lyffe
    Participant

    I’m sorry Creaking Door, but that statement ‘According to the British Meteorological Office “D-day should be within one day before, to four days after a full moon” is a load of total rubbish. Do you really believe that the Met Office would have any say in one of the greatest military operations in history?

    The parameters for the invasion were decided by the military planners taking into consideration the varying needs of the Army, Royal Navy and RAF. Military considerations meant that the operation could only be undertaken in summer during a period of new or full moon, and a low tide at dawn (to facilitate the safe landing of troops). Militarily the ideal conditions were a sequence of four quiet fine days, small amounts of cloud below 8000 ft, visibility of 3+ miles and an on-shore wind not exceeding force 3 (8-12 mph). Of the three summer months, May, June and July, the greatest probability of those conditions occurring was found to be in June. On that basis, coupled with the moon phase, was 5 June chosen as D-day.

    In the event had the military been prepared May would have been the better option but, as it wasn’t, D-day had to be in June. As it happened early June 1944 was one of the stormiest on record. For practical reasons the final go/no-go decision had to be made two days before the preferred date for the invasion; on the evening of 3 June the forecast for the 5th was of stormy conditions, way outside the limits required, and the landing was postponed. It wasn’t until the following evening, 4th June, that the forecasters offered a brief window of opportunity in the forecast for 6th June; Eisenhower courageously took that opportunity – and the rest is history.

    For the record on the next preferred date for a landing, in terms of moon phase, 18 June, the weather conditions were worse than at the beginning of the month.

    Source (amongst others) “Forecast for Overlord; June 6 1944” by J M Stagg. (pub: Ian Allan)

    Although Deryck says the night of 5/6 June was not a moonlit night, there was a full moon that night, moonrise being at 1834 GMT on 5th and moonset at 0404 GMT on 6th – the unfortunate thing is that it was at times obscured by cloud. The importance of the moon was not so much as the light it provided for an airborne landing, but the influence it had on the tide.

    Brian

    in reply to: Croydon Aerodrome #1220885
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Nope Roger – I wasn’t aware of its existence. Many thanks for the link.

    Brian

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 278 total)