dark light

Lyffe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 278 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Biggin Hill 30th August 1940 #1167760
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Gerry,

    Just to note there were also civilians who died during the raid. One was Norman Arthur Roberts, who was in charge of the met office and on observing duty. He had just completed the 1700 GMT observation (Calm, no cloud, visibility 12miles) when the bombers struck. He was unfortunate in that he was in the air-raid shelter that was hit by one of the bombs.

    Although he had served in the RAF for 12 years before joining the Met Office he was not offered the same recognition as the other fatalities, although his family laid him to rest in the Star Lane cemetery. His grave is almost lost at the at the other end of the cemetery from the CWGC section, the bit that is vandalised and uncared for. There is no headstone and it took me ages to find it.

    Brian

    in reply to: V2 for a Halifax #1192448
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Shucks – and I thought I was the only dunce! V2 = Tafe off safety speed (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_speeds).

    Many thanks Mondariz, that will do me nicely. I suspected it was around that figure but needed confirmation.

    Brian

    in reply to: Old Warden Hangar One/RFC Stonehenge #1195627
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Rob,

    Suggest you obtain a copy of ‘Wings over Wiltshire’ by Rod Priddle (Pub ALD Design & Print; ISBN 1-801-587-34-7) which includes a history of the airfield at Stonhenge with a considerable number of photographs. Amongst these is one of the ‘coupled GS Aeroplane Sheds’ – I don’t know if this is what you are after, but if you email me I’ll try and scan a copy for you.

    Stonehenge was operational from October 1917 to 1920, with the Domestic and Technical sites extending a considerable distance either side of the A303, just west of the fork with the A344. Local legend has it that one of the COs requested that Stonehenge be removed as it constituted a hazard to aviation!

    Brian

    in reply to: RAF Airfield I.D., 1930s ? #1224866
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Gentlemen,

    Having spoken to Chumpy off-board, and seen other photos in his collection, I can confirm the photo is of Upavon, taken very early in 1938 – I found a similar (dated) photo in the National Archives with exactly the same aircraft configuration as in one of Chumpy’s photos.

    The photo was taken shortly before work started on improving and developing the camp’s facilities. This included a ‘C’ type hanger which was built just to the east of the ‘A’ type in Chumpy’s photo; the hanger was completed in April 1939.

    The only unit in residence was the CFS, which equipped with Tutors, Furys, Harts and Ansons, although replacement of the latter with Oxfords began in November 1937. (Source: ‘Wings over Wiltshire’ by Rod Priddle (2003)).

    Brian

    in reply to: RAF Airfield I.D., 1930s ? #1225547
    Lyffe
    Participant

    I have a similar photo found in the National Archives that’s dated 1938, but I wonder if anyone could suggest a date for Chumpy’s.

    Brian

    in reply to: RAF Airfield I.D., 1930s ? #1225730
    Lyffe
    Participant

    I’m pretty sure it is WP840. You will know another hanger was subsequently built to the east of the one shown, and I think (open to correction) that is also used by the gliding fraternity.

    Brian

    in reply to: RAF Airfield I.D., 1930s ? #1225776
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Upavon without a doubt. I’ve aerial photos of the airfield dating from 1913 to 1937; the clump of trees behind the hangers on the left of the photo and general road pattern are distinctive. Any chance I could have a copy? I’m particularly interested in one of the minor buildings – it was the very first airfield met office and is still there today.

    The first photo is taken from the south (give or take a few degrees) over what was known as the South airfield; the North airfield is just visible to the top right.

    The annex along the hanger was converted into the met office in 1944, and was used as such until 1972 – I worked in it from 1966-72.

    Brian

    in reply to: Pioneers of Flight -Farnborough Air Show #1239714
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Further to Derek’s post, I think you will find this website interesting: http://www.codyflyerproject.com. I haven’t seen the whole aircraft, only bits and pieces, plus a photo of the final assemblage, and it is stunning.

    Brian

    in reply to: Moderator's message to all: Private Message spammers #1167210
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Barracuda,

    If your are sure it’s a Spam, right click on the address in the mailbox, and you should be presented with a drop down box full of options – including ‘delete’.

    Brian

    in reply to: Flight magazine – May 1917 #1174906
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Thanks Barnstormer – received OK and filed ready for use.

    Brian

    in reply to: Flight magazine – May 1917 #1175125
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Many thanks for your offer Barnstormer,

    I’ve emailed you – I misread the date it should have been 10 May, not 19 May.

    Avion Ancien,

    It is indeed part of the Flight archive, but the copy I’ve printed is not very clear – most of it’s OK for reading, but the Figures lack clarity. As I’ve replied to Barnstormer my copy is such that I misread the date.

    Thanks for your thoughts.

    Brian

    in reply to: Flight magazine – May 1917 #1175409
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Much obliged T-21 – the pointer I needed.

    Brian

    in reply to: Lancaster ED715 #1194572
    Lyffe
    Participant

    John,

    Not ‘Bump’ – try posting your query on the RAF Commands forum at http://www.rafcommands.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=&f=1.

    (Unless you have already, but if you have I can’t find it.)

    Brian

    in reply to: The British Weather #1196013
    Lyffe
    Participant

    Sorry Chris, it’s not a view it’s fact. I was a forecaster for some 40 years, and trends were being identified all the time. Between 1963 and 1966 I was a very junior member of the Met Office’s long range forecast team (which produced the monthly forecasts). The team used an analogue techinque – the mean values of temperature, pressure etc, for the past month were compared with those for the same month over the previous 100 years. The aim was to identify 4-5 similar years, then base the forecast on the weather of the following months from this sample.

    Seems crude I appreciate, but the Met Office was forced into issuing what had been experimental forecasts as a matter of political expediency. The success rate was very low, but it demonstrates trends cannot be relied on. I’ve lost count of the papers I’ve read on the subject. One of my bosses at the time produced a number of learned papers that apparently showed the winter of 1962/63 was part of a trend towards a mini ice age, with long cold winters and heavy snowfall – my sledge is still in the loft waiting to be used.

    I appreciate autumn, and winters, have been generally milder than the long term averages, but I’m afraid the only 100% guarantee of trends is that they will reverse.

    I hear what you say about the apparent change to better autumns (winters are generally warmer as well), but my point is that these swings never persist and always reverse at some time.

    Brian

    in reply to: The British Weather #1196399
    Lyffe
    Participant

    With respect Chris,

    Rainfall patterns are always shifting, ’twas ever thus, but to assume they are going to continue following a trend is living in cloud cuckoo land. What happened at Fairford was unfortunate, but nothing unusual. Summer has always been a season in which there is localised heavy, thundery rainfall events. If you go back through weather records you will find many similar instances – the Lynmouth floods of 1952 are a case in point.

    Last Sunday I was at a show in Wootton Bassett, about 7 km from Lyneham; during the afternoon there was a very heavy shower, yet Lyneham remained dry. On the afternoon that Fairford was washed out, we had hardly any rain at all in Devizes, about 35 km to the south.

    Fairford was plumb unlucky, I’m sorry people were disappointed and were out of pocket, but it happens – it’s the nature of British weather. Just because it’s happened this year does not mean that it will happpen next.

    Brian

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 278 total)