dark light

Insig

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 389 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2405553
    Insig
    Participant

    With a better engine the Tejas would certainly make history but I still do not understand why the mk2 Snecma is not good enough if it powers the already in IAF service mk2h. It is a known engine and surely can be bought with full tot and production.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2405599
    Insig
    Participant

    >The Russian military cooperation with India has also been predicated on the joint need to deal with the common Chinese threat.

    Russia formed the bases for Chinese developments. Russia is provinding them engines for Fc1, J10, J11. Russia is willing to provide them more if they pay. There is no common chinese threat. Russian political system is closer to Chinese then to India.

    in reply to: U.S. to stop counting new Russian ICBMs on Saturday #1808973
    Insig
    Participant

    The US started a nuclear deal with a non NPT member… I think that was a much worser move. One side you punish nations for trying civil nuclear technology, the other side you give a nation that wants to produce atomic weapons to do so by sponsoring its civil markets. I think there is no excuse for that.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2407565
    Insig
    Participant

    Source: http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/464/
    US-built fighter aircraft operating next to Chinese combat jets

    December 8, 2009 defpro.com | Not many modern armed forces unite in their inventory, and particularly among their key assets, technology from two – in political terms – entirely opposite origins. It is more common in the countries of the former Soviet bloc where, since the fall of the iron curtain, Western technology slowly but ever increasingly found its way into countries primarily equipped with Russian weapon systems. In the past two decades the Middle East and southern countries of the Asian continent have become areas in which Western state-of-the-art weapon systems competed next to weapon systems from Russia or other former antagonists to lead these countries’ armed forces into a new age – globalisation in the political and industrial defence world.

    These countries – not only geographically in between history’s current major players – slowly revolve the old political and economic structures in a natural process and, with their growing political self-confidence, create a new link between the cumbersome super powers which, mostly from behind the scenes, will shape the next decades.

    Pakistan is one of these interesting examples, however, with a very unique character. Just as its neighbour and long-lasting political antagonist, India, it develops an increasingly emancipated character in its choice of new weapon systems as well as in its desire to further develop its domestic R&D as well as production capabilities. India currently is in the process of extensive trials for its future fighter aircraft programme (MMRCA) in which aircraft from the US compete against European as well as Russian solutions of the latest generations (see http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/380/). The final choice in this particular race will be a forward-looking one for the face of the Indian Air Force.

    On the other side of the Thar Desert, the Pakistani Air Force (PAF) brings together an interesting mix of aircraft from all over the world and, in particular, from the US, Russia and China. Due to its historical development, the first aircraft to be used by the Pakistani Air Force were US- and UK-built aircraft. However, in 1965 Pakistan received its first fighter aircraft of Chinese origin: the Shenyang J-6. Since, fighter aircraft of the US as well as from France (the PAF still strongly relies on its French Dassault Mirage IIIs and Mirage Vs) have been operating next to Chinese fighter aircraft. A clear political development can be deduced from the history of fighter aircraft of the PAF: from the post-colonial influences to a regional power at the mercy of the political gravities to a growing national identity and self-determination.

    Today, Pakistan is expecting to take delivery of its first of 18 ordered Lockheed Martin F-16C/D Block 52+ very soon (older versions of the F-16 have already been operating in Pakistan since 1982), bringing the total number of Pakistani F-16s to 54 when the last aircraft will be delivered as scheduled in December 2010. Furthermore, as various press sources have reported mid-November 2009, Pakistan has signed an agreement with China for the procurement of 36 Chengdu FC-20 (J-10 export version) to be delivered by 2015. Finally, Pakistan is also in the process of introducing a growing number of FC-1/JF-17 fighter aircraft, jointly developed by China’s Chengdu and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) Kamra. With the first two small batch production aircraft having been delivered in 2007, Pakistan has since received a good dozen of these aircraft and, as reports Flight International, is expecting to introduce at least 150 domestically produced fighters into service (the number has increased to an estimated 200-250 aircraft).

    This development would not only provide Pakistan with a significant number of state-of-the-art air combat assets but also brings together technology from the Far East and the West in an interesting unity. Many eyes of these two political and industrial camps will be glued to the PAF to gather information on this process and the other’s craftsmanship.

    F-16 … FC-20 … JF-17

    As outlined above the PAF has been combining Western and Chinese aircraft since the 1960s, including bombers and trainer aircraft and is, furthermore, expecting to receive four Chinese Shaanxi Y-8W airborne early warning & control (AEW&C) aircraft equipped with AESA radar by 2011 that will be operating next to Pakistan’s brand-new Saab 2000 Erieye AEW&C aircraft. But let’s take a look at the three state-of-the-art fighter aircraft that will be racing Pakistan’s skies in the near future.

    Pakistan’s newest member of the F-16 family, a two seat F-16D Block 52, has been unveiled on October 2009 at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth, Texas, facility. The ceremony was attended by the PAF Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Rao Quamar Suleman. The current order, dubbed “Peace Drive I”, is for 12 F-16Cs and six F-16Ds, powered by the Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 engine, with an option for another 18 aircraft.
    “The Pakistani and U.S. leadership has worked very hard to develop a strategic partnership between the two countries in order to achieve our common strategic interests,” said Rao Qamar. “If this relationship is to succeed, it has to be built on a solid foundation of trust between the two allies. This F-16 is not just an aircraft, but a capability for Pakistan. It is a symbol of trust and the relationship between Pakistan and the U.S.”
    As the PAF explains on its homepage, “the PAF had originally planned its force structure to include than a hundred F-16s by the end of the century, but these plans could not be implemented because of the US embargo [of the 1990s due to Pakistan’s testing of a nuclear bomb]. The service is, thus, currently in the process of evaluating other high-tech fighter aircraft for procurement.”

    The outcome of this process is quite clear: a stronger co-operation with China which obviously offers Pakistan not only to possibility to acquire new combat aircraft but also of jointly improving its domestic industrial capabilities. The Chengdu FC-20s to enter service in 2015 will replace the aging fleet of combat aircraft such as the Chinese F-7s (a version of the MiG-21 which has been recently upgraded) as well as the extensive fleet of Mirage IIIs and Vs. As the PAF explains, “Chinese systems such as the F-7s provide the staying power to absorb losses and to take punishment in the face of a much bigger adversary. Planned upgrades to equip these less capable fighters with modern radars, better missiles and ECM equipment will help enhance the PAF’s combat capability.”
    The FC-20 is not among these less capable fighters. It is the export version, modified to Pakistan’s requirements, of one of China’s most capable multi-role fighter aircraft with a delta-wing and canard design. It was introduced into the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) in 2005 and in April 2006 the Pakistani cabinet approved the procurement of 36 of these aircraft which can be compared to the aircraft generation of the F-16, the Gripen or the Rafale.

    Although a greater challenge for the Pakistani Air Force than the mere purchase of new assets, the development and introduction of the JF-17 (Pakistani designation for “Joint Fighter”) has continuously and obviously successfully proceeded. The first aircraft of this type took to the skies in 2003. The first small batch of pre-production aircraft was delivered to Pakistan for operational evaluation purposes in March 2007. The first Pakistani-manufactured JF-17 was rolled out and handed over to the PAF on 23 November 2009. On the occasion of the hand-over ceremony Rao Qamar said that 40 JF-17 would be produced by PAC Kamra within next three years and would be inducted in PAF replacing the existing aircraft. Furthermore, he confirmed that the first JF 17 Squadron would be established shortly. The JF-17 is a lightweight and low-cost multi-role fighter aircraft with a high manoeuvrability and beyond visual range (BVR) capability. It has advanced aerodynamics configuration and high thrust.

    —-
    By Nicolas von Kospoth, Managing Editor
    http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/464/

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2407901
    Insig
    Participant

    I do not think that the French will go for vintage IAF Mirages. As Swerve said… Vintage 1980 M2000-H are at the moment worth zero. Probably the oldest still flying. Even if a nation would go for them then it needs upgrades and that is going to be expensive. If they go for alternative (already upgraded or brand new plane) then there are more options. Just think about FC1, J10 or the US block30 at AMARC would surely come as cheap. If a nation has already the Mirage 2000 (very few) then it needs seriously upgrades. If not then it would not go for a French plane due to the upgrade price or spare part prices. And who would buy almost 30 years old plane? How long can one use them? I do not think the French will go for a deal with swapping the Mirage 2000H…

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2407914
    Insig
    Participant

    Strange that they added canards. One might think that it would have TVC. Adding canards and TVC would add weight and other problems. I do not think that the plane is for RCS test of the F22. J10 is also a real plane and I think that we can expect that Jxx is surely going to be real. How it exactly looks we will not know till the end. But we also do not know PakFa… I am looking forward to see both planes evolve.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2408087
    Insig
    Participant

    Buying back oldest mirages 2000? And that for a price they sell newer examples… I do not think it is realisitic.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world -IV #2408089
    Insig
    Participant

    There’s nothing to upgrade on a brand new F-16, as proposed to India :rolleyes:

    If Israel wants room for local f35 upgrade and they had done local upgrades on their brand new Sufa…

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world -IV #2408242
    Insig
    Participant

    And they can offer some upgrades.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2408655
    Insig
    Participant

    If you ask me then India has a much more powerful weapon (BM+nukes) and a country with size of India you cannot run into to destroy them. With certain developments you will have naval strike options (nuclear subs). I think besides some border issues it will be a no go for both nations. It is a MAD scenario and no one is willing to do that…

    But let us go into cetarus paribus mode and look at only border airwar…

    The Mirage2K will perform superb aircover if based near the border. With Awacs you do not get much vision into China. China is behind amazing mountains. The mountains itself would be a good cover for the M2K if they would go that far. But if with a2g then you do not have the range unless you go with IFR and then you give away everything (speed, rcs etc). And flying low in that area is not only inefficient but also risky.

    About doing research. I think you should refrain from personal remarks. It is degrading you opponent while we should use respect. Your passive Mica will be seen at max range by the JF17 passive sensors. What makes you so sure that Chinese are not using that system if they added it on the JF17/FC1? WE can see it on J10A/B. That will start ECM or active reply automaticly. And that max range is probably when flying up high and towards eachother. Do you think that Chinese do not have radar cover, AWACS or other means to intercept? Do remember that a research concluded that USA would have to retreat even when using F22 cause of the numbers. You can have many MKI or upgraded X but that doesn’t make you come near to Chinese numbers. When numbers rise you lose an expensive high tech plane as easy as the old one. So I do respect you national pride in everything but it has some shortcomings. I can always say that MKI or latest upgrade X is untested in real war scenario with real smart opponent…

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2408714
    Insig
    Participant

    I am a big fan of the Mirage 2000’s – with RDY-2 radar, a full glass cockpit, airframe life extension, complete overhaul, and an all internal brand new EW system, these will be very potent aircraft, even in the IAF vs PLAAF contest. While the Mica is shorter ranged than the AMRAAM, its Mica IR version is a very potent system & guided by AWACS, the Mirage 2000’s could carry out near silent interceptions.

    -I am curious how the upgrade (if ever happens) will have impact on PLAAF-IAF contest. In case of war the PLAAF has bigger numbers and I doubt the MK2 will go deep into China.

    -Guided by awacs almost any fighterjet can carry out near silent interception… In this decade that is not that new anymore.

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1809171
    Insig
    Participant

    It looks same as the Green Pine but the T/R modules, RDP and software. It is based on Green Pine and built with Israeli assistance but different with better capabilities. LRTR-2 will be a long range radar with 1500 km range most probably X-band. Earlier there was a pic from Aero India or Defexpo but I forgot where it is now.

    Isn’t it strange that it is same as Green Pine but with Israeli assistance better then Green Pine? The Israeli are not the party that export a better version while they risk their nation by having inferior examples. I even bet that it has more chance of being inferior what the Israeli have.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world -IV #2412256
    Insig
    Participant

    MKI is certainly a nice plane and it is surely tested to its max. Accidents happens, mistakes also but let us wait before blaiming the pilots or producers. Two in a year… You do know how many F16’s crashed in Belgium or Holland in the first years? Two is nothing. 🙂

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world -IV #2413268
    Insig
    Participant

    Having no US components is a clear reason to go for something else. Isn’t Lula left wing that supports Ahmedinyad openly? Well, I would then make the choice indeed simplistic.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2413790
    Insig
    Participant

    Why not getting Israeli higher payload versions? Joint development maybe? And sometimes it is cheaper to buy just best option (like the Russian said that they did not want ow quality and just went for Israeli) then to go for trial and error as a rookie. Not to degrade anyone but if Russia goes for it then we might think that… I see no advantage of building big numbers like we could when talking about LCA.

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 389 total)