Nice, but fixed is fixed! Tilted back cause a lack in air to ground capabilitys.
Lower resolution and lower antenna gain ind the down direction and can’t look over the shoulder..:rolleyes:
Or you can count them for yourself.
You know what a coarse grid is?
Why should I count when no men know what a real and what a dummy T/R is in this grid!
The same for the Captor-E between 1300 and 1500T/R are possible but with a greater coverage as the AN/APG-81.The gain of a phased-array antenna deteriorates into dependence of the angle of the irradiation! Another drawback of a fixed AESA.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235954[/ATTACH]
lol, The F-35 has more T&Rs than a Eurofighter 😉
Sure? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzDke56vMiU 0:40 Northrop-Grumman state 1000 T/R for the AN/APG-81!
http://www.deagel.com/Aircraft-Warners-and-Sensors/ANAPG-81_a001381001.aspx 1000T/R!
The Russian television stations stood by the report, saying their source was the Russian Union of Engineers, an obscure Moscow-based group that had previously issued a report claiming that the Malaysian plane had been downed by Ukrainians. The organization’s vice president, Ivan Andriyevsky, said in televised remarks that it received the image from a man who said he was a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with 20 years experience as an aviation expert.
Attempts to reach Andriyevsky by telephone and email on Saturday were unsuccessful.
Yep, the L-39s shown the typical zig-zig pattern of a Gast principle cannon.
Armor-piercing ammunition use depleted uran. The common combat load is armor-piercing ammunition commonly with incendiary ammunition.
But a Su-25 is little bit short of breath for the altitude of a 777 and to slow.
A little hint the Su-25 canon is a dual-barrel canon. 
No sign of a dual barrel pattern on the MH17.
Putting Storm Shadow in a pod would be like putting a pod in a pod.
Why put a stealth cruise missile in a additional container?
LoL Ebola I say only Biopreparat!
Evidence Is Now Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down Malaysian Airlines MH17
Sure a Lufthansa driver and an OSCE non-professional are specialists for air defence.
What MBDA says
Nach Angaben des Rüstungskonzerns MBDA, der unter anderem Boden-Luft-Raketen herstellt, ist anhand von öffentlich verfügbaren Fotos der MH17-Wrackteile “keine zweifelsfreie Bewertung” der Absturzursache möglich. Experten der Firma hätten bei der Analyse der Bilder aber durchaus Erkenntnisse gewonnen. So deute die dichte Verteilung der Löcher in der Außenhaut des Flugzeugs auf die “Detonation eines relativ großen Splittergefechtskopfs mit natürlicher Splitterverteilung (breites Spektrum an Splittergrößen)” hin. Dies würde zum “Buk”-Abwehrsystem passen: Seine Raketen nutzen großformatige Fragmentationssprengköpfe, die in der Nähe des Ziels detonieren.
Zudem haben die Fachleute nach Angaben einer MBDA-Sprecherin auch Anzeichen gefunden, die gegen den Beschuss mit der Bordkanone eines Kampfflugzeugs sprechen: Zum Beispiel müssten die Einschusslöcher kleiner sein, da Geschosssplitter von Bordkanonen kleiner seien. Der Beschuss mit einer Bordkanone würde das zivile Flugzeug auf Reiseflughöhe zudem nicht so stark beschädigen, dass die Trümmer und Leichen auf dem Boden so weit verteilt wären, wie es der Fall war.
According to the arms company MBDA, producing, among other things, ground-to-air missiles, “no unequivocal assessment” of the cause of the crash is based on publicly available photographs of the wreckage MH17-possible. Experts of the company but had quite recovered in the analysis of images findings. To interpret the dense distribution of the holes in the outer skin of the aircraft on the “detonation of a relatively large splinter warhead with natural fragment distribution (wide range of sizes Splitter)” out. This would fit to “Buk” – defence system: His rockets use large format Fragmentationssprengköpfe that detonate near the target.
In addition, the professionals have, according to a spokeswoman MBDA also found evidence that speak against the fire with the cannon of a combat aircraft: For example, the bullet holes would be smaller, since projectile splinter of cannon were smaller. The firing of a cannon would also not damage the commercial aircraft at cruising altitude so strong that the debris and corpses were so widely distributed on the floor, as was the case.
You should may be first understand the difference between a shrapnel, burst fragmentation and a rod fragmentation. 😉
A rod caused elongated holes when the ring disintegrates.
Typically laypeople mix up shrapnel and burst fragmentation.
The MH17 shown the typical burst fragmentaion damages.
That looks like ship. What on Earth are you showing? Is it supposed to be in any way relevant for once?
Rod warheads send out shrapnel in the shape of a cone. Fragmentation warheads send out a shrapnel spherically. The effect is similar except fragmentation, by nature, peppers the entire body, not just a circular area along its width.
A rod warhead send not shrapnels out.
Continuous-rod warhead
Not ashamed to give a neo-facist source.
LoL his source is a satire page.
A Russian soldier has posted pictures to Instagram that show him operating military equipment inside Ukraine, including manning a missile launcher system of the type used to shoot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/maxseddon/does-this-soldiers-instagram-account-prove-russia-is-covertl