dark light

KKM57P

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 577 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The EuroFighter Typhoon #2489257
    KKM57P
    Participant
    in reply to: He is back! He is angry! Rafale News Four! #2489746
    KKM57P
    Participant

    The EF was never selected after due competition with the Rafale actually. In Austria it was selected because IIRC they paid the company of the wife of the austrian air force chief or something like that. In Saudi Arabia it was pretty much the follow up of the Al-whatever contract. There was no open competition either. Greece, which selected the EF too never had a competition between the Rafale and the EF.

    Nic

    The only who I know who sentenced for bribery is Serge Dassault (2 years probationary). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agusta_scandal

    http://www.iht.com/articles/1998/12/24/belge.t.php

    Dassault Chief Is Also Convicted : Ex-Head of NATO Sentenced In Belgian Bribery Scandal

    The court also convicted Serge Dassault, head of the Dassault Aviation company, for paying a bribe to obtain a contract to re-equip Belgian Air Force F-16 fighters with new electronics. It sentenced him to a two-year prison sentence, but suspended it.

    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-51324209.html
    Dateline: SEOUL, South Korea French aerospace giant Dassault Aviation may lose a multibillion dollar fighter jet project in South Korea after its local agent was implicated in a bribery scandal, local media reported Monday.

    in reply to: The EuroFighter Typhoon #2490383
    KKM57P
    Participant

    BAE in negotiations with Oman over £1.4bn Eurofighter deal
    By Sylvia Pfeifer, FT-Defence Industries Correspondent
    Published: November 13 2008 02:00 | Last updated: November 13 2008 02:00

    BAE Systems is in talks to sell up to 24 Eurofighter Typhoon fighter aircraft to Oman in a deal worth at least £1.4bn, the Financial Times has learnt.

    UK defence sources close to the negotiations said the Gulf state wanted to replace its 24 ageing Jaguar jets with Typhoons within the next four years.

    Any agreement would be structured as a government-to-government contract, similar to last year’s ‘Al Salam’-deal to sell Typhoons to Saudi Arabia. The deal could also lead to similar ‘billions of pounds’ worth of maintenance and support work for BAE, Europe’s largest defence -contractor.

    Another export deal in the Middle East would be a feather in the cap of Ian King, the new BAE chief executive. In a sign of the company’s commitment to the region, the BAE-board, led by chariman Dick Olver, has decided to hold its first ever meeting in the Middle East in the coming weeks.

    The sources said that BAE had been talking directly to the Omani government about the sale without using external advisers. The group’s use of middlemen formed part of an investigation into allegations – always denied by BAE – that bribery was used to secure a deal to sell arms and aircraft to Saudi Arabia in the 1980s.

    BAE Systems’ business in the Middle East has garnered much media attention in recent years, mainly on one of its most lucrative contracts, the al-Yamamah deal to sell Tornados and Hawks to Saudi Arabia. But, to the intense frustration of its management, the focus has been on long-running allegations of corruption and bribery related to the contract, always denied by the company.

    Behind those headlines, the Middle East’s region’s contribution to BAE’s financial health and, arguably, Britain’s economy, should not be underestimated.

    The export of some aircraft to Oman would also help avoid the severe financial penalties incurred if the UK cancels any part of its Eurofighter order and would help ease budget concerns at the Ministry of Defence, which is committed to buying 88 new Typhoons as part of its membership of the Eurofighter consortium.

    The Omani contract would also help secure crucial manufacturing jobs in the UK at a time of falling employment. Oman has a close relationship with the UK, which has supplied the sultanate with defence equipment for decades. Its air force also operates American F-16 jets.

    Last night, a source close to the MoD warned that the deal was not yet concluded. “The Omanis are looking at what capabilities are available in the market, but they may decide this is not the right time for them,” the source said.

    BAE commented: “Oman is a customer with whom we have a long and valued relationship . . . we will continue to support their requirements as and when they arise.”

    in reply to: The EuroFighter Typhoon #2494465
    KKM57P
    Participant

    That would explain why so many were shot down. :diablo:

    Against a third world country like Irak no loss.:diablo:
    In Kosovo a higher loss rate as the F-16! 😉
    One direct hit and one total sth.
    Technology delivered direct free to the door of Moscow.
    Or why is the F-117 retired?;)

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2495132
    KKM57P
    Participant

    @arthuro
    Like a B2 which use continuous curvature.

    Many roads lead to Rome!:diablo:

    in reply to: F-35 failed at noise measurements #2495149
    KKM57P
    Participant

    When this happen on a aircraft carrier then is that harmfull for the deck crew.

    Military Equipment Noise Costs $900 Million and Veterans’ Hearing!

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi-bin/client/modele.pl?session=dae.42558038.1225793779.WsbQ1n8AAAEAAFpg@DIAAAA8&cat=3&prod=99308&modele=release

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2495181
    KKM57P
    Participant

    The little problem in technolgie transfer what I see, Thales is not the owner.
    The T/R-modules came from UMS Ulm Germany (Thales/EADS) and use patents from Fraunhofer/Germany.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: F-35 failed at noise measurements #2495201
    KKM57P
    Participant

    Resonance failure

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2495586
    KKM57P
    Participant

    True.

    The question IMHO is how effective this feature is.
    No dought these teeth, difuse creeping EM waves and reduce radar return.

    But is this effect in the same order of magnitude as the main source of reflecting energy, which comes from specular reflection?
    Leading surfaces of the Rafale still produce a lot of specular reflection

    You should think again, the leading egde from wing and canard are highly sweeped!

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2495782
    KKM57P
    Participant

    This proves the sawtooth patter on the belly on the Marine Rafale in front of this gaps.

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2495785
    KKM57P
    Participant

    Another perspective…

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2495805
    KKM57P
    Participant

    Or the later two didn’t pay so much attention for reducing RCS of the little components of airframe ~ This may be reasonable, if the fighters didn’t have any thought about reducing RCS at the designing stage and have to carry so many unstealthy weapons and equipments outsides, the meaning of trying to reduce the RCS of the little components of airframe may be too small to do it.

    “Saw-tooth” ridges have been used by every stealthy fighters and many fighters who declare they do care about reducing RCS in the world today, such as Su-47, and Rafale.

    The sawtooth pattern on the Rafale is patchwork for fix the reflex problem on straight gaps (90° )and near straight trailing egde.
    Without this sawtooth the traveling waves bounced back direct in direction to the enemy Radar.

    Su-47 and Stealth is a bad joke.
    The forward sweeped wing and the LERX set up a 90° corner reflector (reflector stud)!

    in reply to: JSF cockpit too small for tall dutch pilots #2495977
    KKM57P
    Participant

    Height restrictions are nothing new…an American actor I know of was dropped from pilot training because he was too tall,

    United States Air Force Brig. Gen. James Maitland Stewart ?

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2496365
    KKM57P
    Participant

    Go ask the F-117/F-22/etc designers…:D

    😉

    No, he should ask Kelly Johnson, first use of „re-entrant triangles“ on the A-12 and SR-71.

    in reply to: The EuroFighter Typhoon #2496614
    KKM57P
    Participant

    A natural law:
    “The laws of physics maintain that energy must be conserved. If the monostatic RCS is reduced by shaping, the incident energy must be distributed elsewhere. As such, the target signature is increased at some or all bistatic angles.” :diablo:

    Exemplary for the F-117.
    The RCS values are indicated by colour coding and
    ranged from -18 dBm^2 (dark blue) to +24 dBm^2 (red). The frequency ranges from 100 MHz on the inner circle to 2 GHz on the outer circle. The aspect angle corresponds to the target geometry sketch in the centre of the diagram.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 577 total)