If I am not mistaken he did not eject the first time…
Would have been somewhat unhealthy!
http://www.crazyaviation.com/movies/JAS_39_Gripen_Crash.mpeg
First read this:
Stealth design of airplanes
http://www.fighter-planes.com/stealth.htm
“”Jet Wakes
The driver determining radar return from a jet wake is the ionization present. Return from resistive particles, such as carbon, is seldom a significant factor. It Is important in calculating the return from an ionized wake to use nonequilibrium mathematics, particularly for medium and high altitude cases. The very strong ion density dependency on maximum gas temperature quickly leads to the conclusion that the radar return from the jet wake of an engine running in dry power is insignificant, while that from an afterburning wake could be dominant.””
And therfore used the caesmium adetiv A-50!
A50 surpressed the ionisation.
Alone the new ITT nanomatrial RAM reduce the RCS to 10% then minus Planform minus continus curvature (more advance as the diamond shape (F-117) and first used on the B-2), Brewster etc.
Supercruis, no VHF dectabel afterburner plume, reduce IR-sinature.
Yeah, Baby Paveways.
Where is the laser desginator?
So you finally agree that the shape ain’t the main factor what makes the F-22 stealthy..
Continuously curvature, no 90° angels, hiden fan, death-running radar beam inlet duct, frequncey and polarization selectiv radom, RAS, RAM, gold planted canopy and and.
http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRHeft/FRHeft07/FRH0704/FR0704b.htm
The differing statements provide evidence that Russian armament programmes are still beset by uncertainties. The delivery of the first two aircraft was also something of a propaganda event: the “02” was still not fully equipped and is likely to remain in Novosibirsk for another six months. Meanwhile, the “01” is heading to the military test centre at Aktyubinsk (Astrakhan) and subsequently to the 4th CBPiPLS combat training and retraining centre in Lipetsk. The first two aircraft in the production series will be used to support the two prototypes and five pre-series aircraft in the second phase of the field exercises, although some systems, such as the rear radar system and navigation and targeting pod are still not available.
DA2 with 18 Brimstone

Cines alone make no stealht fighter.
Okay a Paveway UK is only 110lb heavier as a GBU-16.
Paveway UK weighs is 546.58kg and for the GBU-16 496.69kg.
http://www.airpower.at/news06/0925_evolution-ef/drop-gbu10.rm
This is a GBU-10
GBU-10 and the GBU-16 is a Paveway II.
A Paveway UK weight 546kg and is 110lb heavier as a GBU-16.
Please show us a GBU-10 Paveway II on a outboard Rafale Pylon!;)

Paveway II hat trick for Typhoon
Our charming Froggy chum requires photo evidence of the GBU-10 (the word of the manufacturer and of the BAE Project Pilot not being enough) and since your link and photo show UK 1,000-lb LGBs he won’t be happy……:D
GBU-10 and GBU-16
http://www.eurofighter.com/documents/general/EF_UpdateILA06.pdf
and Storm Shadow 2711lb/1230 kg
