http://www.airpower.at/flugzeuge/eurofighter/vergleich.htm :rolleyes:

Alone the new ITT nanomatrial RAM reduce the RCS to 10% then minus Planform minus continus curvature (more advance as the diamond shape (F-117) and first used on the B-2), Brewster etc.
Supercruis, no VHF dectabel afterburner plume, reduce IR-sinature.

Yeah, Baby Paveways.
Where is the laser desginator?

http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRHeft/FRHeft07/FRH0704/FR0704b.htm

The differing statements provide evidence that Russian armament programmes are still beset by uncertainties. The delivery of the first two aircraft was also something of a propaganda event: the “02” was still not fully equipped and is likely to remain in Novosibirsk for another six months. Meanwhile, the “01” is heading to the military test centre at Aktyubinsk (Astrakhan) and subsequently to the 4th CBPiPLS combat training and retraining centre in Lipetsk. The first two aircraft in the production series will be used to support the two prototypes and five pre-series aircraft in the second phase of the field exercises, although some systems, such as the rear radar system and navigation and targeting pod are still not available.

Cines alone make no stealht fighter.

This is a GBU-10

GBU-10 and the GBU-16 is a Paveway II.
A Paveway UK weight 546kg and is 110lb heavier as a GBU-16.
Please show us a GBU-10 Paveway II on a outboard Rafale Pylon!;)

Paveway II hat trick for Typhoon

Our charming Froggy chum requires photo evidence of the GBU-10 (the word of the manufacturer and of the BAE Project Pilot not being enough) and since your link and photo show UK 1,000-lb LGBs he won’t be happy……:D

http://defence-data.com/f2006/pagefa1022.htm 😀