Call me naive, but what possible reason would they have to ask people not to attend the final landings apart from safety?
Cost – mentioned this many posts back. There are no safety issues. It simply means that the Police have complained that a large crowd would require more resources, and presumably indicated that VTTS would be expected to pay for them. The reality is that the resources required would be a couple of cop cars for a couple of hours. There is nothing to police other than the perimeter road to the south of the runway threshold. Spectators only park/stand here or on the disused old Bawtry Road. So the whole storm is over a small stretch of road that could be policed easily if they wanted to bother policing it. Reality is that there has never been enough people here to bother. Same applied to the last flight on Sunday. Why would the two flights this coming weekend be any different to every other flight that has taken place since the whole saga began? The only possible increase in spectators might be the very last flight, but even then it’s hard to imagine how crowds could increase by such an amount that the Police couldn’t handle them. It’s ludicrous. The result of this nonsense is that VTTS is clearly withholding the date/time of the last flight and my guess is that they’ll announce it maybe half an hour before it happens. And all for no good reason. The safety/policing issue is a big, fat red herring that people have foolishly believed. In my view (shared by countless others) there is no good reason why the last flight of all shouldn’t be publicised so that the people who have paid for it can see it. If VTTS wilfully hide the event then shame on them.
Have to agree that the Mosquito is unlikely to excite too many people. I’ve see a lot of people stating that they’d love to see a Mosquito flying in the UK but I can only think of the days back when BAE’s Mosquito was on the air show circuit. It was enjoyed by certain enthusiasts but for the vast majority it didn’t even get a glance. It was one of those air show “acts” that people used to hit the beer tent or toilets. Problem is that less-dedicated enthusiasts, the general public, and particularly younger people don’t have any urge to consider the history and importance of the Mosquito. They just saw a fairly small aeroplane wearing a pretty dull paint scheme that made the same noise as a Spitfire but didn’t perform the same aerobatics. I’m sure that if a Mosquito does re-appear in the UK’s skies, a lot of people will be delighted (personally I think I’d be quite indifferent unless it happened to be in target tug colours!), but it’s never going to be the “next big thing”.
I think the Shackleton is the only serious contender. It’s big, it’s loud, and produces a noise like no other aeroplane. It’s an impressive machine to look at too. So it enjoys the advantages of being of huge interest to people who lived or worked through the Cold War years, whilst still having visual and audible appeal to the less-fanatical enthusiasts. Even though I’m almost as enthusiastic about the Shackleton as I am the Vulcan, I had forgotten just what an impressive beast it was until I watched a recent engine run on WR963. I don’t think anyone could fail to be impressed by four Griffons at full power driving contra props, with the wings and tail fins waggling. I just have to remind myself that the Shackleton looks and sounds even more impressive in the air 🙂
It was quite comical that despite all the fuss made by VTTS, Finningley was no busier than usual yesterday. The usual people were parked on the perimeter road and on the disused road, but there were no more people than usual. As last week, we managed to stand in splendid isolation for three hours until a couple of locals decided to walk over for a look. The situation seems to be that very few serious (ie- followers of VTTS etc.) enthusiasts actually go to Finningley. The serious photographers certainly don’t waste their time on the perimeter roads, as thery’re pretty useless for getting good photos (unless the aircraft is landing from the south, which happens only rarely). The photographers go to the places where one can actually get a decent view. So if this is the case, I’m not even sure that the people parked on the road sides know anything about the pleas from VTTS. I would assume that most of them are just casual spectators who turn-up for amusement. Certainly most of them sound like they are – with kids running around asking when Concorde is going to land, etc. Certainly no sign of the Police “locking down” the area! As expected, the VTTS statements are just nonsense intended to influence or mislead. Unfair and unnecessary. But I still assume it is just a hint of how they will treat the last flight. Isn’t it just a terrible shame that an event that should be celebrated and seen by all who would like to see it, looks like being conducted in secret for absolutely no good reason.
We are talking reality.
Wasn’t referring to your comment David, I was referring to some of the previous posts 🙂
… anyway, back to reality… anyone have any news about the last flight?
I guess the only serious plan in the pipeline is to get Shackleton WR963 back in the air so I’m sure a lot of Vulcan fans will be transferring their affections to this slightly older Avro machine. The folks at Coventry seem very confident and able, and they certainly have a great deal of serious engineering and technical support coming their way, so hopefully their efforts will result in success. Personally, I’m also worried about the future of the CAF airframes. Mr Collet seems keen to ensure they go to good homes but whether they will all fly again, or if they fly overseas, is another question. The past couple of times I’ve been to Coventry the Canberra is sat out on the grass looking distinctly unloved, and the Twin Pioneer is partially dismantled, looking virtually abandoned. The Meteors were still active and hangared though. I hope the Canberra survives the sell-off and returns to flight and hopefully the Twin Pin too. Have to wonder what will happen to the Meteors. It would be awful if they followed Winston’s path to Australia.
I see mention of a “corporate event” at Sywell on 13 October for the Vulcan – so maybe this is the actual “last flight” although there doesn’t seem to be any more detail about it.
Brilliant stuff 🙂
I refer you to my previous comment – again 🙂
If people are so worried about the financial side of the dealings,make the accusations and take them to court.
They’re not so worried. You’ve simply not read the previous posts properly 😉
Charlie yes, I agree! But hopefully you can see where the cynicism comes from with regard to VTTS? It isn’t without good reason.
Bruce – you’d probably be best advised to look back a few years and re-visit what was said on this very forum back then. Simply praising Pleming for getting the Vulcan back in the air is fine, but it doesn’t dismiss every other aspect of the project’s handling.
Well, to be fair, there is evidence. For example the money taken by Robert Pleming is known – it is in the accounts. Some of the expense claims (some amounting to thousands of pounds) were almost comical, had it not been for the fact that the money came from donations. But the fuss over the mis-use of funds slowly disappeared when the Vulcan started appearing at air shows. Evidently, people either thought that the prospect of seeing the Vulcan fly was far more interesting, or they thought that the issues over the misuse of funds might be better overlooked if it meant that XH58 did at least fly. Either way, it doesn’t mean that a lot of us have simply forgotten, nor does it mean that there is no evidence.
True, my view probably isn’t shared by the majority. But that is undoubtedly because the vast majority of Vulcan fans know very little about VTTS or even the Vulcan itself. Plus, a lot of people are happy to take a simplistic or optimistic view of the whole project. However, don’t imagine that there isn’t also a large number of people who have followed the whole story since XH558 left RAF charge. If you go back far enough, you’ll know that the whole project was surrounded by accusations and controversy from the moment that David Walton allowed the project to begin. Having been in direct contact with some of the people on the project at that time, I (like a lot of other people) know that a lot of things done by VTSS and particularly by Pleming have never been explained, and there’s a persistent belief that a lot of money has been wasted or misused, often in pursuance of self-interest rather than the interests of the aircraft or its supporters. No point in dragging-up all the old stories again here, but if you’re seriously interested, I would urge you to look into the history of the project, and then you’ll see why I (like many others) still believe that VTTS often demonstrate some very questionable motives. The same applies to the final landing, which VTSS seem to be deliberately keeping secret from the very people who have paid for the project. No matter what your views on the whole saga, surely you must agree that this is utterly disgraceful? The same applies to the post-flight plans for XH558 which we’ve discussed on this forum before. So there’s no reason to dismiss a cynical view of VTTS as being unfair or “stupid” – quite the contrary, if you look back at the history of this whole saga.
Keep going Charlie, you may as well illustrate precisely what I said a couple of posts back 🙂
My thoughts exactly. It can’t be beyond their abilities to accommodate the people who want to see the final landing. It would incur cost, but given that they spent a fortune on Friday’s outing (of which the majority was for photography), it’s clear that they can spend money when it suits them. There’s no reason why the Airport couldn’t allow access to the northern area of the airfield and pay for the necessary security and safety requirements – it is only a one-off event after all. As has been said previously, if this kind of thing is beyond their abilities, what is going to happen when they ground-run the aircraft in the future?
I’m firmly with those who believe that yesterday’s statement is nothing more than shameless spin-doctoring, designed to discourage spectators from going to Finningley, so that the last flight can be conducted in secret for the benefit of friends or those who shell-out enough money. It is no way to conduct what will be a very historical moment and it says an awful lot about VTTS and their true motives that often seem to be more about self interest than support for the Vulcan.
I agree hampden. As you can see from the above, my last post resulted in just one useful reply from TonyT before the usual schoolboy comments appeared. Mentioning this will of course result in yet more equally childish responses, and so the cycle continues. I just wish the people that make these comments would understand that they do not impress the recipient, nor do they impress anybody else. I sometimes imagine that they write this stuff and picture hundreds of readers nodding in agreement. Of course the reality is that everyone ignores the comments because they simply see “adults” trying to insult each other like children. The result is that the readers simply ignore the thread and go elsewhere. It happens repeatedly, so that every interesting subject is eventually destroyed by these people. We could have had an interesting debate about the Vulcan here and maybe the actual enthusiasts (as opposed to the tiresome people mentioned previously) could have come together to form a common view on this subject, which might then have had some influence on what is really happening. Let’s see if we can have some relevant comments now perhaps? Or is it back to more snipes from the children?