dark light

Boom

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371888
    Boom
    Participant

    I googled and could not find any, infact the most information I have about the tender is that article. There is nothing in Force/India-Strategic or any other defense mags regarding it but for that one article.

    sorry what on earth are you talking about ? the first link in a google search for : india heavy lift helicopter tender
    note the source :rolleyes:
    http://www.indiastrategic.in/topstories304.htm

    The Indian Air Force (IAF) has released the much-awaited tenders for 22 combat and 15 heavy lift helicopters to US, European and Russian manufacturers.
    ………
    On Tuesday, the RfP for the Heavy Lift helicopters was released.

    do not blame others for your inadequate computer skills.

    in reply to: A-5s for Dedicated CAS #2371932
    Boom
    Participant

    even before the advent of smart weapons massed armoured formations without air cover were dead meat to enemy CAS aircraft. as IAF showed in the battle of longewala, a small number of hunters and HF-24 maruts protecting a single infantry company stalled an entire pakistani brigade reinforced by tank regiments and ended up destroying more than half its tank strength.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2371955
    Boom
    Participant

    Originally Posted by quadbike
    How many articles, magazines have you published ?

    a few, some on defence matters. obviously not under this name. πŸ˜€

    anyway, you don’t get credibility by joining a media group, credibility is gained by a history of sensible reporting over a period of time. people who have that in India are T subramanium, P Chacko joseph, Col Shukla sans his PAKFA and JSF bias, Huma siddiqui and a couple of others. aroor is enthusiastic and much improved from his DDM avatar but he still makes some silly mistakes sometimes.

    prasun has stolen articles from BR, bill sweetman and even now the man simply makes up news item after news item and has no shame even after all of them are found out to be copy paste jobs of unrelated reports.
    some examples here :
    https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewtopic.php?p=1182729#p1182729
    https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewtopic.php?p=1182732#p1182732
    article here http://trishul-trident.blogspot.com/2011/10/update-on-latest-iaf-mig-29-crash.html
    copied almost word for word from
    http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Into+the+dark%3A+Night+flying+has+always+been+a+great+challenge.+The…-a082475621
    farce’s editor gazala wahab had to be served legal copyright notice to prevent them from stealing BR photos. less said about their credibility the better.

    You discredit Mr Aroor, Sengupta, Col Shukla all based on what ? Because you are a member of a fantasy nationalist forum called BR ?

    sweety you still do not understand simple facts of life. appeals to authority or credibility by association are not valid methods of judging the worth of an author or his/her articles. I do not base anything on who I am but what I write.

    lastly, this is the russian aviation forum, can we PLEASE get back to scheduled programming ? it would help immensely if you lay off prasun sengupta fanboyism for a while. :rolleyes:

    —————————————–

    something I asked sometime back but got no reply. what is the status of the Mig UCAV called skat ? is there any indication of a second fighter type from russia, whether manned or unmanned ? a lighter 5th gen perhaps ?
    lastly, what is the future of mig after the mig-29k’s and the few mig-35’s to RuAF are done ?

    in reply to: Theory behind allocation of Soviet Nuclear warheads…? #1795841
    Boom
    Participant

    ^ accuracy is a big factor in choice of weapons.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372192
    Boom
    Participant

    disprove it ? :rolleyes: just look at the gazillion of reports on the net on the heavy lift chopper tender.

    force, also known as farce is hardly a reputed defence mag. who asked you to take my word for it ? I believe google is not blocked at your place ?

    Sengupta while being a chor, is right about a lot of things.

    a lot ? more like none.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372217
    Boom
    Participant

    quad, you are quoting prasun chorgupta as your source for that silly information ?
    http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic972345.jpg

    TR1, sengupta is as reliable as a drunk on weekend, no wonder quad carefully avoided mentioning the source. πŸ˜‰

    the tender is for 15, not 6+4+16=26 as prasun claims, nor has there been a break-up.

    btw, funny comment in the above video. πŸ™‚

    inο»Ώ soviet russia, helicopter lifts your helicopter

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372289
    Boom
    Participant

    I am getting you alright, just saying you are wrong. πŸ˜€

    heavy lift helo for IAF is not for troop transport, flat terrain or not. if used for that it would be a bonus.
    it’s for transfer of oversized cargo like light arty, 4X4 etc.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2372306
    Boom
    Participant

    MKI uses the Sura K.

    why do you think I mentioned it ?:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2372310
    Boom
    Participant

    Or it could just be decided by brides once again.

    It’s not because that officials claim out loud that they are not going to let bribes play a role that it won’t happen behind the curtains.

    Nic

    brides ? mail order ? :dev2:

    once again ? after the bofors issue, Indian defence procurement, esp the larger ones have been quite clean. even then it was the politicians, not the officials who were bribed to change the decision.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372320
    Boom
    Participant

    8850 metres – the highest top of the world the Everest
    8100 metres – the height reached by helicopter Mi-8MTB with engines TWZ-117WMA-SBM1B

    just being able to reach that point is not the same as being able to operate there.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2372512
    Boom
    Participant

    is that the same as sura-k ? sorry, I always confuse the russian helmets.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372526
    Boom
    Participant

    quad, read my post. google sumdorong chu. πŸ˜‰
    IAF moved one full infantry brigade to a high altitude area almost overnight using the monster.

    Tr1, IAF can’t use the mi-17’s in many of its AoR’s due to altitude limitations but it does operate in the mountains. it uses the cheetah and increasingly the dhruv at the highest places (above 20k feet) dhruv is purpose built for those heights and it beats anything else hands down when it comes to high altitude performance.
    I don’t know if the chinook is better because afghan mountain ranges are generally lower in height.

    Keep in mind Mi-26T2 is an improved machine.

    that’s why it is in the running. you can bet IAF will be keeping a close eye on maintenance practices.

    You are not getting me can it extract a group of soldiers stuck on a narrow mountain cliff like the Chinook can with its rear door open and backed up all the way, it cannot because of the tail rotor.

    I strongly doubt if that is even a concern for IAF, it has enough mi-17’s and dhruvs to do that kind of thing.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372584
    Boom
    Participant

    the thing is IAF has been extremely dissatisfied with mi-26 uptimes, they have been hangar queens most of their lives. so much so that at no point of time has the full fleet been serviceable simultaneously. and this is not a force that is unfamiliar with mil bureau helos or doesn’t know the capability of the mi-26. (google sumdorong chu)

    the current thinking is they are willing to sacrifice some of the capability if it means better uptimes.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2372661
    Boom
    Participant

    I have spent most of my life in bengal and have friends and relatives who have been and are elected members from the west bengal left parties. as I said, your understanding is extremely flawed. not surprising given that you follow the hindu. while an excellent newspaper otherwise it is not remotely reliable when it comes to politics.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2372674
    Boom
    Participant

    dude, you have no understanding of bengal politics. that massive victory came on the back of massive rigged elections and bloody political violence, in the best traditions of communist politics. which is why EC arranged for unprecedented security and strict pre-poll policing this time.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 877 total)