dark light

Boom

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2341419
    Boom
    Participant

    Sancho78, I don’t get your point. if you know that jaguars and mig-27 are not dependent on external jamming pods why are you hanging your hat on a reasoning build on someone else’s faulty data ?

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2341424
    Boom
    Participant

    Would be an easy application for the Su-30MKI, the weapons are basically already there. Any potential interest in Kh-59M2? Saw those in front of Indian MiG-29Ks at MAKS.

    true true. they are just busy sending MKI sqdns to the chinese sector.

    Sancho, both mig-27 and jaguar carry DARE internal jammers. for heaven’s sake please read up on the topic before entering a discussion on it ! 😮

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2341501
    Boom
    Participant

    there will be, there isn’t one yet AFAIK. would be very happy to be corrected though. 😉

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2341590
    Boom
    Participant

    Both Jaguar and MiG-27 are hoplessly outdated. ECM and range/payload charcteristics don’t qualify them as strike fighters anymore.

    MKI’s are primarily tasked with air superiority and naval strike with Brahmos.

    all I can say is, you are hopelessly misinformed or uninformed about the kind of regular upgradation that has gone into either the Jag or the Mig-27. range and payload might be a little lacking but in terms of electronics they are already at par with what the upgraded mirage-2000 will bring to the table.

    MKI’s are tasked with air dominance and long range strike, no MKI has been tasked with naval strike, a job that is left to navy subs and surface ships in addition to one squadron of jag IM.

    MKI’s brahmos integration is aimed at stand-off strike at high value land targets like C3I nodes and SAM sites.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2341887
    Boom
    Participant

    same thing. intermediate between basic trainer (props i.e HTP-32 at the moment) and Advanced Jet Trainer.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2341981
    Boom
    Participant

    quad, please don’t entertain i.e. on his quest to derail this thread.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2342102
    Boom
    Participant

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UEI7JZ50iE8/TVriIkYwQLI/AAAAAAAAMyA/8zHCUaRNlRw/s400/took.jpg 😀

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2342279
    Boom
    Participant

    ^ geo-politics is a subject better discussed outside the military forum.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2342305
    Boom
    Participant

    now that you have raised (both ?) your eye-brows and ‘re-assessed’, what are you going to do about it, my exalted overlord ? 😀

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2342541
    Boom
    Participant

    check photo yogi’s flickr account. lot’s of eye watering stuff there !

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoyogi/

    here’s hi-res for that image

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoyogi/5450284871/sizes/l/in/photostream/

    @Deino and quad, he is a little concerned with smalltime local publications lifting his work.
    if you can email him (ID in the pic) with a request he will be happy to oblige.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2342565
    Boom
    Participant

    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4146/5450284871_39f8dab4dd_z.jpg

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2342678
    Boom
    Participant

    Back to the Navalised Typhoon, like you say, I’m not sure India would want a Naval Typhoon too. Then again I’m not sure what they want in general as far as a Naval airframe is concerned. If I were India I’d certainly look into a Navalised Typhoon and the Rafale would just be too tempting. I sure want the UK to go for Rafale for the Carriers well be sharing with France, it makes perfect sense to do so in my book.

    well personally, I rate the chances of a naval typhoon as rather bleak. IN has ordered 45 mig-29k and 46 NLCA Mk2. that’s 91 4th gen fighters.

    their next order is definitely going to be a 5th gen one.

    that said, in the MRCA itself I’m pretty certain tiffy and rafale are leading the pack at the moment, which is entirely to my liking. 😎

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2342716
    Boom
    Participant

    @ quad, I wasn’t aware of a running feud with you in the first place ! 😀

    btw, the mig-21’s would be long gone by the time LCA LIFT emerges (if it does).

    p.s. isn’t it time to start a new thread ? we are at page 22.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2342722
    Boom
    Participant

    I think that’s a very definite possibility and the decision makers seem to be thinking along those lines as well.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2342801
    Boom
    Participant

    I wonder if there would be a market for a LCA-lite two seat advanced trainer.

    As I see it, it would be a pretty nice offset oackage for the AdlA to replace its ageing fleete of alphajets. The MN could even get the naval variant. And it could give a light attack capability just in case, or for low intensity operations in Africa and such.

    Nic

    they did have such a proposal but frankly with the korean T-50 quicker out of the doors I don’t have high hopes for that proposal. it’s still possible that IAF would eventually use a stripped down version (single seat) in a way similar to the MOFTU’s, a kind of finishing school for fighter pilots before they went to join their respective squadrons.

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 877 total)