dark light

Boom

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2352190
    Boom
    Participant

    Firstly, IAF does not have the Litening III, only the Litening. So my argument stands. Its a generation behind Sniper.

    Top Owl is essnentially a helicopter helmet, let me know when you can cue AIM-9Xs on it….

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/SlC6dHmKPfI/AAAAAAAAHfM/Z4Ywbzsj3XA/s1600/1-796350.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2352685
    Boom
    Participant

    hatchet job means something quite different to what you mean here. 😀

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2352942
    Boom
    Participant

    of course he is not ! literacy isn’t a pre-requisite to get a graduate degree, didn’t ya know ?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2353091
    Boom
    Participant

    Weren’t HAL’s own licence-production lines set up from scratch for foreign tooling and training? I can’t see any more difficulty in setting up one under, say, Tata or Mahindra with foreign assistance.

    HAL in its earlier avatar as hindustan aircraft already had considerable experience with propeller planes. they didn’t just start manufacturing fast jets one fine morning. it doesn’t happen that way.

    Heck, back when the Mirage-2000 was in the MRCA competition, Tata had an agreement to shift the whole assembly line to India for manufacturing them.

    which, for all we know would have involved turning screw-drivers on a SKD kit. also, I think you are confusing between the F-16 and mirage-2000.

    in reply to: Where can I find a colour photo of T10-17? #2353345
    Boom
    Participant

    http://www.mars.slupsk.pl/fort/sukhoi/small/su27-t10-17-1982.jpg

    http://www.mars.slupsk.pl/fort/sukhoi/big/su27-t10-17-1982.jpg

    2 min with google. 😉

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2353390
    Boom
    Participant

    I find it rather annoying that HAL alone is being asked to handle over a dozen development/licence-building/upgrade programs at the same time when even IAF personnel and they themselves have stated their manpower limitations. Why can’t the production and upgrades, at least, be farmed out to the private sector to let them cut their teeth in aerospace manufacture?

    HAL is off-loading as much work to the pvt sector as it (pvt sector) can handle at the moment. you need to go through each program to get the details.
    one can’t expect the pvt sector co’s to start building su-30’s in a week starting from a non-existent base.

    in reply to: Argentina joining KC-390 program! #2353818
    Boom
    Participant

    Given that KC-390 is being designed with tanking in mind….:rolleyes:

    that was actually a general question about refueling kits.
    I do know about the 390.

    in reply to: Argentina joining KC-390 program! #2353827
    Boom
    Participant

    swerve, which are the transports that the israelis can fit a refueling kit ?
    or is it that the system is flexible enough to do it in any aircraft ?

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2353872
    Boom
    Participant

    it is rather naive to assume that India’s independent foreign policy is going to be swayed by one fighter deal, or twenty for that matter.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2354154
    Boom
    Participant

    if the US insists IAF will simply say no to american birds. even when it was in a much weaker position economically and militarily India didn’t compromise on its sovereignty. it is not going to start now.

    in reply to: Gayduck, Ukraine corvette Prject 58250 #2018814
    Boom
    Participant

    awesome name ! 😀

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2354201
    Boom
    Participant

    source ?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2354206
    Boom
    Participant

    IAF was looking for ASRAAMs for its jags as well. is it possible to arm those with MICA IR ?

    in reply to: CVF for India?? #2018823
    Boom
    Participant

    Well Scooter..India seems to have run into bit of trouble with IAC-1.But still no news on getting outside help for IAC-2.

    http://www.bharatrakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=13897

    this delay is already accounted for in the latest reports. it’s the CNS’ annual press conf and he will pick up from where the CNS left off last year.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2354283
    Boom
    Participant

    Minor elements of the datalink do not count, BTW, & nor do any COTS components which can easily be replaced.

    in fact IAF will most likely end up using its own DL systems.

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 877 total)