dark light

Boom

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1803366
    Boom
    Participant

    I like your personal attacks and gutter comments gives me an indication of how vulnerable you feel.

    However having a order and delivering on time and actually fulfilling the order are two different things. There is R&D and then there is PD …

    ha, throwing derisive adjectives into the air hoping some would stick ?!

    I do note that you have nothing to add on the actual subject though.

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1803431
    Boom
    Participant

    Maybe you have identified the problem with the DRDO, do they think that their work finishes when they have developed something in the lab? Maybe your right the DRDO should care if a unit is working or not in the field as long as they have proved it in some predefined major ensured to make sure the product they make looks successful?

    They have finally tested Agni II i guess the Indian Army dont really need to be able to use it before its declared sucessful?

    sheer nonsense that has nothing to do with what we were discussing. you said

    What India plans and what the DRDO delivers are at 180degrees from each other.

    here we have

    The India military services’ combined orders of the Defense Research and Development Organization-developed Akash, including two radars, have a total worth of Rs 23,300 crore. This is an unprecedented defense order for a DRDO-developed weapons system, and the biggest order ever for DRDO’s tactical missile and radar systems.

    which is $5.2 bn for the kind information of 180 degree matt.

    I guess the Indian military must be goddam dumb to spend that amount of money on something which is ‘180degrees’ from what they need, per well informed self-professed expert shri 180degrees matt ? :rolleyes:
    or that they have no idea if the system works in the field or not according to his excellency 180degrees matt ! :rolleyes:

    the figleafs are getting smaller and smaller sir, the result is not pretty. πŸ˜€
    I would suggest you find some other hobby horse than mindless DRDO bashing.

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1803434
    Boom
    Participant

    Erm when you have a few units of these and have been proven in battle not just on a test range to be similar to be patriot and when you have units of Agni II, III and V operation in the Indian Army with a functioning thermonuclear warhead your very welcome to gloat.:D

    is the honourable 180degree matt left to shifting the goalposts now ? πŸ˜€

    by your logic if India doesn’t pick a military (mis)adventure or is not attacked by a military power then its weapons are useless ? same logic applies to most of europe’s weapons too ?

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1803457
    Boom
    Participant

    where is 180degree matt ? πŸ˜€

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2379935
    Boom
    Participant

    thanks for the snaps kramer. I still have that issue of frontline carefully preserved. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Taiwan's growing fighter gap with China #2380271
    Boom
    Participant

    planeman, small typo, it would be Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2 for the PLAAF and PLANAF versions, not MKI and MK2.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2382253
    Boom
    Participant

    interesting observation about Barbora. it also points out the increasing importance of EAC. previously ACM designates were always with the sword arm, the WAC.

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1803613
    Boom
    Participant

    I had posted, sometime back now, a list of projects that DRDO is carrying out with the initial dates and costs vs the current costs and dates.

    And as much as people would like to chastise me it doesn’t change the fact that even the ministry of defence and prime minister thinks that things need to change.

    “a list of projects that DRDO is carrying out with the initial dates and costs vs the current costs and dates.” does not constitute the explanation I requested from you. as of now I take it that you are unable to do so, even for one project of your choice.

    btw, did you also bother to put a list of the expected dates and cost estimates of similar projects around the world in this list of yours ?
    it is a fact that DRDO had to promise completion of projects in absolutely unrealistic timeframes because the forces asked for the moon by yesterday or else they were going to look outside India.
    India’s precarious financial condition in the 80’s and 90’s along with bean counting babus meant that the initial cost estimates were ridiculously low, even after more than one subsequent revisions of project costs twice and thrice of initial estimates, the total cost of the projects is still as low as a third or quarter of comparable western ones !
    who in their right minds would call that a cost overrun ? this in a country where a lot of the initial project funds were absorbed to set up basic infrastructure itself. which shouldn’t be included in project costs in the first place.

    that the RM thinks there is scope for improvement (and no one argues there isn’t) does not in any way justify your ludicrous statement that

    What India plans and what the DRDO delivers are at 180degrees from each other.

    please stick to specifics and keep your judgemental nonsense away from this thread.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2037197
    Boom
    Participant

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/TAUXIto0lwI/AAAAAAAAKh0/Il8lpGHIeXg/s1600/ARIHANT-718188.JPG

    in reply to: Indian Sea Harriers #2383200
    Boom
    Participant

    ^^
    that was in a seahawk.

    swerve, no problems if you have better sources than my memory. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Indian Sea Harriers #2383527
    Boom
    Participant

    Pictures of Indian Sea Harriers with Derby’s, Magics, or any other weapons are greatly appreciated!

    Can the IN’s SHar’s carry Magics & Derbys at the same time? (Personally I never understood why the RN’s Sea Harrier FA.2’s couldn’t carry the AIM-9 and AIM-120 at the same time while still retaining the cannon. Aren’t AIM-120’s fitted onto AIM-9 rails? Didn’t they use dual AIM-9 rails? Just perplexed me…)

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Galleries/5268-2/viraat01+039.jpg larger image. http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Galleries/News/Events/Presidents+Day+at+Sea/viraat01+039.jpg.html

    swerve, the decision to go for the 2032/derby upgrade was taken after the FA.2 talks fell through, unless I’m much mistaken. the sticking point was the blue vixen radar and not the AMRAAM. IN didn’t ask for AMRAAMs from UK IIRC.

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1803617
    Boom
    Participant

    And neither the Soviets ………….could/….. be able to do better than the Americans.

    sure about that ? other than fanboys nobody claims that soviet weaponry was particularly inferior to US ones during the cold war when both sides had comparable funding levels. where they lagged behind was the US superiority in electronics, which had its roots in the large market for electronics in US and the west. that’s a separate issue from public vs private.

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1803620
    Boom
    Participant

    What India plans and what the DRDO delivers are at 180degrees from each other.

    Will have to see what the re-structuring does apart from create more management roles that eat up budgets but do not add to the value.

    matt, are you able to expand on this comment with specifics for even one DRDO project of your own choice ? do you have the minimum knowledge to do that ? if not, then please do not barge in with your half-baked condescending spam.

    in reply to: Will India end up with both the F-35 and t-50? #2391825
    Boom
    Participant

    Jason, every foreign military transfer that is not included in excess category is listed under FMS. I don’t have the details ATM but in most of the cases you’ve listed the GOTUS paid for the transfers, either via pentagon or SD. I’ll try and post the breakdown later.

    in reply to: Will India end up with both the F-35 and t-50? #2391878
    Boom
    Participant

    has pakistan paid for all those goodies ? πŸ˜‰ or did the US provide them as gift ? I think you need to re-read my comments.

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 877 total)