dark light

Witcha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,232 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA – has Rafale been illegally subsidised? #2301351
    Witcha
    Participant

    If there any new orders I’d think the British MOD would prioritize its own industry over outsourcing production to India. Besides the Indian Hawks are the older mk.115Y variants(renamed to mk.132) and not the new mk.12x series being offered as a LIFT. There are significant differences between the two configurations including nose, fuselage and sections of the airframe.

    in reply to: MMRCA – has Rafale been illegally subsidised? #2301396
    Witcha
    Participant

    Latest reports from India (see the India Times) suggest that Dassault may have offered a potential shift of Rafale manufacturing from France to India, just as BAE has effectively moved all future Hawk manufacturing to HAL.

    That would naturally cost some French jobs (and would generate a massive reaction from French Unions and maybe the French public), but the benefits would be huge. Production costs would be dramatically reduced, and the price of Rafale could be lowered to a degree where arguments about the relative cost of Typhoon would be rendered moot, giving the aircraft a decisive advantage on the export market, and markedly reducing the cost of later Rafales to the French taxpayer.

    It would also give Dassault a low-cost manufacturing capability on future programmes.

    The process would not be immediate. Even after the first 18, French built Rafales are delivered to India, it will be some time before India is able to manufacture Rafales from raw materials. A further batch of aircraft will be assembled in India from major sub assemblies, and then more will be built from ‘knocked down’ kits. Further aircraft will incorporate locally built sub-assemblies, and the proportion of locally built components will progressively increase. And at some point the cost of Rafale will really drop, thanks to the lower cost of labour in India.

    At that point, I wouldn’t want to be a Typhoon salesman.

    And wait… What? The latest Hawk 128 LIFT variant is being built in the UK; the Indian assembly line is only for the Indian Hawks, and HAL has no re-export rights for the same.

    I don’t think we asked for any re-export rights for the Rafale either, which is a great shame given we could easily have gotten it if Brazil could do so for its much smaller order.

    in reply to: USAF cancels AMRAAM replacement #1794204
    Witcha
    Participant

    I wonder if this means they’ll invest in a ramjet-powered version of the AMRAAM sometime in the future as an answer to the Meteor and the K-77M…

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2301405
    Witcha
    Participant

    Question: Will the PAK-FA’s composite skin be anything like the low-maintenance ‘fiber mat’ radar-absorbent skin that was developed for the F-35 or will it just use more conventional spray-on RAM coatings?

    in reply to: MMRCA – has Rafale been illegally subsidised? #2301411
    Witcha
    Participant

    I believe the option for 63 more Rafales is in fly-away condition, similar to the additional Su-30 buys over and beyond the original 180(140 of which were to be HAL-built).

    As such Dassault still has a good chance of retaining jobs via domestic production if HAL’s production rate isn’t as fast as the IAF would like… All the more loss for the Typhoon, of course. 18 + 63 fighters would have been larger than any other export order they’re likely to get anytime soon.;)

    Witcha
    Participant

    I was referring to Dhruv.

    Regarding empty weight, Dhruv is about 2550 kg. I am pretty sure Ka-226 is around 2000kg tops. Depends on configurations of course.

    You are right though, Ka-226 MTOW is way more than Fennec.

    I am really pulling for Ka-226 though, and not just in the Indian competition. Fennec has had its time and large sales, time for the Ka-226 to make its mark. I really like the co-ax rotor configuration, and what it does in terms of making the body easily accessible from sides and rear. The podded body system seems useful, and the bird’s looks have really grown on me. The canopy is really futuristic.

    http://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2011-08/1313130972_0_66bf9_ca30f707_orig.jpeg

    I share your views. It’s strange why such an innovative multi-role chopper design hasn’t had any military orders so far even in Russia: Being able to switch from utility to SAR to MEDEVAC in the hangar would be great.

    Yes, I’m curious why this was paired up against the much smaller Fennec; not quite the same weight class. If you ask me the perfect competitor to the Ka-226T would have been this beauty.:cool:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocopter_EC_635

    Like the Ka-226 it has an unconventional design(with Fenestron-enclosed tail rotor) and is available in four different configurations. It can also perform the armed scout/special forces delivery role whereas the Ka-226 is unarmed and utility-oriented.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2301437
    Witcha
    Participant

    India to Buy 71 More Russian Helicopters

    I’m personally against buying so many of the vintage Mi-17 design(that has reached the limit of its potential), that too with absolutely no TOT, offsets or local production despite the large order size. I wish the IAF had scrapped the Mi-17 deal when Mil raised its price and issued a medium helo tender instead. That way we may have ended up getting a large number of domestically produced NH-90s or EC-725s instead…

    in reply to: Enhanced Paveway, dual mode #1794224
    Witcha
    Participant

    So it essentially combines the features of JDAM and laser guidance kits like Spice?

    in reply to: MMRCA – has Rafale been illegally subsidised? #2316914
    Witcha
    Participant

    Is the OSF really that defective? The MMRCA terms had included an IRST I believe, and I don’t think the Rafale would have made the shortlist if it didn’t have a working one.

    Even if the OSF doesn’t work, wouldn’t it be possible to integrate a third-party IRST with the Rafale? An OLS-UEM or maybe even PIRATE?

    in reply to: MMRCA news XI #2326798
    Witcha
    Participant

    Seems like Reliance industries wants a share of mmrca pie.
    http://www.defenseworld.net/go/defensenews.jsp?catid=3&id=6573&h=Dassault%20RIL%20Join%20Forces%20Defense%20Sector

    Good. As a matter of fact the whole production should have been given to a Dassault partnership with an Indian industrial group, instead of making HAL the Indian contractor yet again.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2333110
    Witcha
    Participant

    The T-50 prototypes actually have quite a few sawtooth panel edges, just not as many as other stealth aircraft, which I’d assume will change eventually. Examples include pretty much ALL doors and hatches which might open in flight (main and nose landing gear doors, main and SRAAM weapons bay doors, refueling probe bay doors), a few access panels (one on each engine nacelle, some on the lower front fuselage, the three patches on the nose) and the gun muzzle blast protection panel. Also, the upper half of the airframe appears to make extensive use of large monolithic skin panels, so there are fewer edges to serrate or align in the first place, compared to most other aircraft.

    Thanks. This is what I wanted to hear.:D Do you have pics of these surfaces?

    in reply to: MMRCA news XI #2334928
    Witcha
    Participant

    had a shuddering thought this morning, i hope the MMRCA does not go in the way of the artillary competitions!

    Well atleast the DRDO is not sitting on all the documents needed to build a MMRCa type plane.. unlike the the OFB with the arti!

    It’s funny that as far back as 2004 it looked as though the Army was gonna get a full suite of first-class artillery.

    The Bhim T6 was already on trial with the Denel gun for the self-propelled role, trials were ongoing for the towed and wheeled howitzers and it looked like the FH77B and the ATMOS would win, respectively.

    Then the UPA government came, carrying the ghost of Bofors. Denel was blacklisted and the other two competitions reset, the first of a dozen such rounds of blacklisting/reset.:(

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2334965
    Witcha
    Participant

    Sawtooth edges are there to solve problems with spanwise flows and boundary layers over wings and stabilizers, so if you do not see any on the T-50, that means no problems so far, why are you worried about?. :confused:

    Its most significant application is in reducing radar reflection as opposed to a smooth surface. Being a relatively simple thing to implement, I’m just curious as to why it hasn’t been done.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa Thread episode 19 #2335058
    Witcha
    Participant

    What I’ve found worrying is the complete lack of any sawtooth edges on the aircraft structure in all T-50 prototypes so far.

    Sure, there are other ways to achieve stealth, but if it helps, why not…

    Witcha
    Participant

    CH-53K will have comparable power in a more impressive overall package. Fingers crossed that the joint Russian-Chinese heavy lift helo program recently announced is a new design rather than Mi-26T3 or something.

    CH-53 is currently out of production, hence it didn’t figure in the Indian heavylift helo tender. The new version under development won’t be ready for another 6-7 years.

    At present the Mi-26 doesn’t have any real competitors in the market. The only alternative would be to buy a larger number of Chinooks, trading payload capacity for more advanced avionics and a better global support network.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,232 total)