OMG! Seriously, someone nominate Twower for president.
http://twower.livejournal.com/638875.html
16 Red Banner Submarine Squadron. Interior of 949A!
Phew. And people say Soviet ships had ‘spartan’ crew facilities.:rolleyes:
Not too enthusiastic about the ancient steam gauge control panels, though…
What about numbers at such a huge territory after 20-30 years later?
Eh? If you mean production volumes, that can be easily arranged given enough orders.:confused:
I’m in a bit of a puzzle here. Regarding the new Su-35S, what sort of TVC system is it going to have? Different news reports say different things; some say the production Su-35s won’t have TVC, others say it’ll have the same system as the MKI(up-down + left-right limited 3D), and some say it’ll have a MiG-29OVT-style 360deg rotating nozzles.
Also, Klimov claims their new TVC nozzles can be retrofitted on any engine. Would that include the IAF’s MiG-29UPGs, the IN’s MiG-29Ks and the Flanker series?
In the Russian air force is no substitute for the MiG-29
Domestic CB late in the development of a rival to the American fighter F-35
I should think the prospect of a heavy stealth fighter(with more range and payload capacity) at a lower cost than the F-35 would be a good thing. Doom and gloom?
Naval Ka-31 or ground surveillance derivative?
PNS AZMAT FAST ATTACK CRAFT (MISSILE) LAUNCHED
Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Noman Bashir was the Chief Guest at the launching ceremony of the 1st Fast Attack Craft (Missile) being built for Pakistan Navy here at Xingang Shipyard, Tianjin, China.
He said that the project of Fast Attack Craft (Missile) construction represents a quantum leap, not only in Defence Production in naval Sector of Pakistan, but also will meet the long standing operational requirement of Pakistan Navy for the Fast Attack Crafts.
AZMAT Class Fast Attack Craft (Missile) has a crew of 12 to 14 sailors which is less than half that of similar FAC(M). Each FAC(M) will cost of around $50 million each.
It doesn’t say how many.
Also I would appreciate some pics and specs for the AZMAT. Thanks.
hmm a wish you say..
Well, an Indian fan seems to have been wishing a little too hard and gotten ahead of himself.:p Artist’s impression of PAK-FA in Indian service:


http://livefist.blogspot.com/2011/09/indian-artists-pak-fa-in-indian-colours.html
Really does look like a Raptor-ski that way. Not that it’s a bad thing…;)
Gipps Aero was bought by Mahindra & Mahindra. So naturally since they (M&M) were the agency who were going to produce the C-NM5 and Gipps Aero had the experience in building small aircraft, they did it.
That’s not to say that the NM5 is a foreign product with an Indian tag, though. The 28-member project design team currently working on the aircraft is from M&M. I’m guessing the construction of the prototypes was done by the Australian subsidiary to save time and money while allowing their Indian staff to gain expertise.
Thats a very beautiful shot of the MiG-21 Bison. All the “muscles” on the airframe getting highlighted and the burner… 😎
They’ve served the IAF well all these years, but by rights that plane should be in a museum now.:(
And an earlier report on the Saras.
hmmmm…….they could have done this way much earlier rather than wasting 10-15 years to consult the original designers.
So the 15 aircraft that IAF is to get will be the modified Saras.
I’d prefer if they supported the private sector and used the NM5 as a trainer instead(given its intended purpose was to replace all the Cessnas in Indian flying schools). Or alternatively, wait for the 10-seater or 14-seater versions that Mahindra is planning by 2012 and 2014 respectively.
20380s are built at Severnaya Verf, not Sevmash.
And here I thought they were both the same…:D
Nope, Uran is Bal and Yakhont is Bastion. Those systems are due to be delivered in the future, they have only gone to the BSF so far.
These guys are pretty old school, though Redut has crazy range at least.
270km. For a system that old it is impressive.:eek:
Why restrict themselves to Yakhont now? Why not a coastal SSM system with Granit/Vulkan?:diablo:
I see your point but suspect that the new systems are the problem rather than the new hull (distant Krivak relative anyway)…
Pretty much what the articles say about delays. The ‘export’ version 22350 with Fregat radar and Shtil SAM would probably be quicker to build as a quick fix.
Is the Russian Navy only going for Stereguschys from Sevmash(a monopoly) or are they ever going to award a contract for a second, cheaper corvette type like we heard a while ago?
my opinion is that any serious talks of 2D nozzles can safely be postponed till we see second stage prototype engine, that’s another 4 or 5 years
If only they’d started developing the new engine back in 2007 or so when they originally decided they’d have a heavy fifth-gen fighter design by Sukhoi and awarded the PAK-FA contract to them…:(
Wow?!?! Did you really just ask this? Right after the sequence of posts above?
And what do you know about the underbody, really? Tell me all about it. What did your mega-eyeball-radar tell you, halfway across the globe from where the PAK-FA is being flown?
No offence, but I don’t need expert knowledge or mega-eyeball-radars to be able to tell that the underbody would have a lower RCS if those bumps and bulgers caused by the engine intakes were flattened out and filled in for a uniform, rectangular underside.;)
It may be that the present shape already has low enough RCS to be able to compete with the Raptor or JSF already. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t further room for improvement.