dark light

Witcha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,232 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2011491
    Witcha
    Participant

    The IAF’s C-17s also require booms. The Indian MOD just doesn’t seem to care for refuelling capability in general: The six IL-78s have had constant serviceability problems and procurement of six more refuellers has been going on at a snail’s pace.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2011573
    Witcha
    Participant

    Yanks are speeding it up mainly coz, they don’t want that much needed billions getting caught up in scandal or the contract getting cancelled when political situation change.

    And all the deals you mentioned are on US terms. Wait and watch in the future how they will be inspected by the Yanks. Also, with P-8s IN did not even have the voice to oppose the US standard refueling unit. Which mean, if IN needs to have the aircraft to be refueled, they will need to buy American…

    I think a lot of the Indian defence jingo community is overly suspicious of the US. I personally see no need for a great drama about the inspections: They’re supposed to check the effectiveness of the equipment after all.

    It’s not like the Americans are going to invade us or sabotage our equipment for the sake of Pakistan or China(whom they like far, far less than us). The only time they ever antagonized us in this regard is the nuclear tests, and given all the restrictions our government’s signed up to(the nuclear deal, for instance) it’s not likely we’ll test again anytime soon.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2011606
    Witcha
    Participant

    ^But do we know if it will be implemented? Proposed does not mean implemented. As we know the Russian navy is sticking to smaller VLS systems for SAMs(Redut, Shtil, 9M100). I wouldn’t be surprised if the S-400 systems on the new destroyers use a new revolver-style VLS like the Rif.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2011609
    Witcha
    Participant

    ^^ well we can call it that way….
    Btw, RosoboronExport is promoting the Pr.21300 submarine rescue ship to Indian Navy and I feel it would be a good investment.
    Sometimes, the acquisition is with crappy attitude….In the case of P-8, it was hurried up without any tender as if it was the sole component missing in the Indian Navy arsenal.. :rolleyes:

    Earlier we saw a single vendor deal for Scorpene as a fast pace acquisition to built up the force. But the result now is neither is the sub available and the cost is obscene for a basic SSK. An AIP addition to the Scorpene would make acquiring N-subs directly from Russia cheaper!

    Vikie is now delayed by 5-7 months
    IAC-I will arrive only in 2018 and….
    First of the P-17A can only be dreamt off after 2017..

    That’s more a fault of
    -Unreliability/tendency of delays of the supplier in the case of Indian shipyards and Russian firms
    -Improper cost evaluation on the Indian side in the case of the Scorpene deal(The french suddenly slashed costs by a considerable amount to get the Indian MoD to approve the deal, if only the babus had seen whether the low prices were viable we wouldn’t have to suffer subsequent re-inflations of cost)
    -Inadequacy of Indian infrastructure for the ADS and the Scorpene TOT.

    Western suppliers are overall pretty reliable for single-vendor deals. The C-130s, C-17s and P-8s are all going to be delivered on or in advance of schedule.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2011640
    Witcha
    Participant

    UKSK can fit S-300/400 SAMs?

    And I haven’t heard anything about quad-packing Shtil either, else the Russian Krivaks wouldn’t have 2 different VLS systems for SAMs and SSMs.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2011648
    Witcha
    Participant

    So now we have tenders even for components and subsystems?!

    Let’s hope there isn’t an MMRCA like saga for every nut and bolt that goes into the Navy’s ships.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2011656
    Witcha
    Participant

    Some updates on the situation.

    -Apparently the faulty insulation material was sourced from China.

    http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20120921/755760872.html

    According Djachkov work Boiler Design Bureau was conducted in the Russian Federation, and the boilers were manufactured at the Baltic Shipyard. “During the trial in the vessel wall boilers are not technically able to develop full speed. They were tested for a maximum capacity of 40%. When first entering the large capacity of up to 100% was observed partial collapse of refractory masonry in boiler furnaces,” – he said.

    Responding to a question Rogozin, which used materials Dyachkov said that it was “fire clay bricks made in China.” “Unfortunately, the Russian production of this material has been lost,” – declared the president of USC.

    Also, other problems were identified during the trials. These appear to be NATO standard hardware ordered from Britain and Poland.

    http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20120921/755740937.html

    “There are a number of mechanisms that are out of service, including set by NATO. This three chillers, nitrogen generators and a whole range of equipment. These suppliers offered the Indian side,” – said Dyachkov meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin on the situation of the aircraft carrier.

    As noted later Rogozin in his microblog on Twitter, defective units supplying Poland and Britain. “Installation of foreign production units are manufactured to the customer’s request – specifically the Indian Navy,” – he wrote, adding: “But the flight tests are successful.”

    Thankfully, it appears a repair plan is already being set in motion.
    http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20120921/755740937.html

    “According to our calculations, the estimated duration of the repair work will be from five to seven months. Works is designed to be completed in May 2013,” – said Dyachkov meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, dedicated to the situation with the aircraft carrier.

    He reported that the ship deadline, according to preliminary data, will move to nine months. According to him, the USC has a number of proposals to the Indian side, which will allow for that. What is in question, he did not elaborate.

    Top manager added that repairs already purchased the necessary materials, order a brick, selected experts for the daily work in the four boilers.

    The only hiccup would be rumours that Russia is going to ask for still more money from the Indian Navy to fund the repairs. Though I rather doubt these are credible.
    http://idrw.org/?p=14229#more-14229

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2011660
    Witcha
    Participant

    Would it be possible to replace the Kinzhal launchers with 6-cell Shtil VLS modules?

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2011722
    Witcha
    Participant

    ^The Kursk? If anything the submarine request was held to be due to the Russian government learning from their mistake here.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2011943
    Witcha
    Participant

    Ah well. Look at the bright side. Aside from the boiler problem everything seems to gone well during the trials.

    http://www.itar-tass.com/c9/522694.html

    The most difficult components of the test program the aircraft carrier “Vikramaditya” succeed
    MOSCOW, September 18. / ITAR-TASS /. Routine command aircraft carrier “Vikramaditya”, consisting of specialists from Sevmash generally pleased with the results the test ship at sea, despite the shortcomings in its power plant. This was announced today by ITAR-TASS responsible deliverer carrier Igor Leonov.

    He stressed that “despite technical defects in the boiler room of the ship power installation, commissioning team of Sevmash positive about the outcome of the tests.”
    “We believe – said Leone – that the most difficult components of the test program are successful ship.” “The main purpose of the aircraft carrier, – he said, – provision of deployment and use of carrier-based aircraft. Recognized that the most tricky part of the test – this test aircraft and hardware ship. As part of these tests the aircraft carrier” Vikramaditya “was made about 100 successful flights by Russian pilots. All flights have been highly appreciated and our Navy, and Indian experts. ”

    Told deliverer ship, “simultaneously with working all the equipment and systems to ensure safety / performance brake machines and restraints / were optimized transport and refueling aircraft, flight dispatch support in various flight conditions, at different times, with different flight loads.” “In fact, during these tests, we studied the organization vibrant communities carriers” – said its executive deliverer.

    “The second objective of the tests – he said – is working out real operation of dozens of modern electronic weapons systems.” “This problem has also been successfully implemented in full” – summed Leonov.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2306988
    Witcha
    Participant

    It’s a few months old, but apparently this is a leaked pic from Irkut tests on the ‘Super 30’ upgrade. Via bharat rakshak:

    http://www.mycity-military.com/imgs2/141563_63478164_su35spitcabina.jpg

    New cockpit with touchscreen panels. Exciting things lie in store for this program. Let’s hope the FGFA also gets these.:diablo:

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2306991
    Witcha
    Participant

    Considering the Su-33 had its effective fuel and payload capacity reduced by 1/3rd on STOBAR ops, I’m surprised the MiG-29K only has 1000kg knocked off.

    But yeah, any weight savings due to removal of wing folding mechanisms and increased use of composites etc in the MiG-35 would be negligible.

    in reply to: Carrier OR Refund? #2011949
    Witcha
    Participant

    I somehow doubt we’ll get the full $3.2 billion back. I don’t think there’s any clause in the contract for returning the entire ship once complete.

    Even if possible, the Indian Navy wouldn’t do it because it has no choice. Like it or not, we are stuck with a bad deal. We need the carrier, whatever the condition it’s in.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2011996
    Witcha
    Participant

    Don’t get surprised if by chance it becomes the IAC-II. I personally would have like to see the larger Pr.1143.7 being dusted up.

    Two different case.
    The above ship is going to be built ground up from fresh sheets of steel.

    —————

    And? That only increases the chances of something going wrong given their lack of experience with doing something new in this area.

    In any case the IAC-2 is very likely to be a CATOBAR design, which means the IN will look elsewhere, like DCN International.

    Hmmm….Bad decision…

    But there is good news also, like below… vital for supporting the fleet deployment. Hope the number include good replenishment ships
    http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20120914/175960111.html

    The experts in India have not yet displayed their understanding for the need of auxillary ships and its significance in the making of a blue water navy.

    True, and sad. We should be placing orders for dozens of tankers, tugs and replenishment ships at our various private shipyards. But things are better than they were a decade ago.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2012007
    Witcha
    Participant

    Take it with a grain of salt. This is supposed to be the Nevskoye Design Bureau’s next carrier design.

    http://www.ainonline.com/sites/default/files/uploads/8-2012-2_new_russian_carriers.jpg

    What’s more, it’s supposedly on offer to India. After the Vikramaditya fiasco.:rolleyes:

    The successful MiG landing and other progress in the open-sea trials of the Vikramaditya have encouraged the Russians to approach the Indian MoD with a proposal to build an all-new aircraft carrier in Russia for the Indian navy. The vessel would be built at the same Sevmash shipyard at Severodvinsk that reworked the Vikramaditya. The new ship, however, would have nuclear or gas-turbine propulsion. The Vikramaditya’s water boilers run on diesel.

    The Nevskoye design bureau in St. Petersburg has been working on a next-generation carrier for the Russian navy since 2005. It has already produced several design proposals and submitted them to the Russian navy for assessment. It is believed that the new carrier on offer to India will be based on one of these proposals.

    As for the Russian Navy,

    However, a high-ranking source in the Russian navy said that that service wants a ship “a lot more advanced than the one on offer” from Nevskoye. The Russian navy’s “dream” carrier would be armed with advanced self-defense systems able to intercept high-flying targets, including low-orbiting satellites. It should also have “underwater capability,” the source said, hinting at the ability of the carrier to carry advanced manned or unmanned submersible vessels.

    😀
    http://www.ainonline.com/comment/1873

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,232 total)