I sincerely hope that happens, and the MRCA order is cancelled. By the middle of the next decade, the the Tejas Mk.2 would have been introduced and IAF will already be looking at 5th gen fighters and UCAVs, instead of 40 year old souped-up F-teens and MiGs.
Ugh.:mad: This is jingoism taken to new levels. The Tejas mk.2 is a paper plane that is yet to reach even the prototype stage. Even after it is inducted full-scale weapons integration and testing(the LCA mk.1 still isnn’t cleared to carry PGMs, for instance) will take at least till 2020. I trust the IAF’s decision to induct a state-of-the-art fighter that they need TODAY instead of having endless faith in ‘indigenous’ promises from a company that has a long history of not keeping them.
The stuff about the F-16’s ‘future’, if true, probably refers to the fact that it has limited upgrade potential after decades of creating new versions. I’d say the same applies to the MiG-35 as well.
It was a great missed oppurtunity for the Indian MoD for not accepting the IAF’s initial $5 billion request for 120 Mirage-2000s before the MMRCA tender. I recall there was a serious proposal on the cards to shift the assembly line to India under Tata…
About the radar, wouldn’t it be possible to retrofit the Saab Vixen-500E AESA instead of the RDY-2?
UMPO delivered the products of 117C to the Komsomolsk-on-Amur
JSC “Ufa Engine Industrial Association” has delivered the first two engines AL-41F-1C (117C) for the SU-35C.
Item 117S is a deep modernization of the AL-31F engines with a thrust on the two tons higher than in the base engine.Rotating nozzle with thrust vectoring control provide maneuverability at low speeds, and other unique characteristics of multi-functional SU-35C.
Under the agreement with the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Association. Gagarin, signed in 2009, UMPO before 2015 should produce 96 products 117C for Su-35C Air Force Russia.
Source: Company UMPO “
Posted: 06/08/2010 , 17:37
Can the 117C be retrofitted on to older Flanker models like the Su-30 or will that require structural changes?
What I’m afraid of is that the ‘leak’ scares AK Antony and his clueless MoD into scrapping the MMRCA tender. Especially if the ‘losers’ start levelling accusations of bribery.
I see Zumwalt as being similar to the (surface) Virginia class and (maybe) the Ticos. Possibly overambitious but laying the groundwork for a successor
Funny. I see more of a parallel to the Seawolf class and the B-2 bombers. :rolleyes:
Well, I hope the US Navy is happy with all those features. Because at two ships it isn’t really going to do them much good.:rolleyes: Hopefully their next destroyer design will be a little more down-to-earth.
Possible render of the Project 22350 Admiral Sergei Gorshkov.

It’s not confirmed, and may be an alternative design variation or even far art, but you have to agree it’s one beautiful design.:D
I particularly like the platform between the bridge and bow deck. It can potentially hold much more than the 16 UKSK VLS shown in the diagram.
These ‘Watchdogs’ take great delight in maligning the armed forces’ modernisation plans but are always careful to avoid criticising the MoD that is actually responsible for most of the problems. The Navy chose Isreali suppliers because they had a good relationship with them. What’s wrong in selecting suppliers based on preference? It’s the same as the European nations being preferential to EADS, Thales, BAE and so on. But single-vendor deals are anathema to AK ‘I want (Communist) transparency!’ Antony; heck, he even tried to block purchase of ALCMs for IL-38 MPAs on the grounds that there should be a competitive bidding(like MMRCA) to be fair.
At the end of the report it mentions the armament of the sub as 18 torpedoes and a number of ‘Igla’ Manpads (which is news to me)
Russian subs have been carrying modified Strela and Igla MANPADs in remotely operated mast launchers since the 70s. They’re not designed for underwater launch and can only be used when surfaced, but they provide a rudimentary defence against ASW helos.
An interesting view of the Pyotri Veliky, especially the 3D animation and internal panoramic views 🙂
😮Very impressive! I was especially surprised at the crew quarters and facilities. I’d been under the impression that Russian/Soviet warships had relatively few crew comforts but aside from new secondary accessories like the internet access and iPod chargers on the Type 45 this clearly isn’t the case.
I was shocked at the comment on the wine rations, though. Is the nuclear reactor so poorly shielded that crew members need red wine every day to counteract the effects?
Varyag would have a(the) late(st) model KVG-3 boiler (see below). The white block you are referring to is not even vaguely reminiscent of a KVG-3 type boiler. In fact, there is nothing in the pic(s) to suggest it is being installed on board the Varyag, or even intended for installation on it, or is even on the dockside along the Varyag. Looking at the two photo’s accompanying that pic, I’m more inclined to think it is a cooling element associated with the fixed planar phased arrays.
Boiler pic and info from an MilParade article that is no longer available online. ( http://milparade.udm.ru/24/contents.htm )
Yes, except there is no news whatsoever of any purchase of Russian boilers, as I said before.
The dorsal spine is present in a number of fighter types, both one and two-seater variants. It generally holds extra fuel, the braking parachute and sometimes the radar/missile warning system.
Second Il-78 tanker for PAF?
Does the PAF even need tankers? Their combat capability is aimed solely at defending against India and all their fighter-bombers are stationed not far from the Indo-Pak border. Unless they’re planning to offensively invade deep into Indian territory(an unviable plan) I don’t see why they’d need that kind of range.
Something like Jindalee isn’t a naval asset, it’s a strategic national asset. It isn’t for sale, AFAIK, but the Russians have built OTH radars, & maybe they might be persuaded to sell.
Note that you do not put OTH radars in forward positions. They have a large minimum range. The best place for radars to cover the Indian Ocean would be the Deccan, to make sure that Sri Lanka & the Maldives were not too close to see.
Out of curiosity, how large?
And if JORN itself isn’t for sale, then would a development partnership of some sort be within the realm of possiblity?
The way I see it what the Indian Navy needs the most is a network of long-range OTH radars to monitor entire Indian Ocean region right up to Chinese and Arabian shores(Yes, I know, wishful thinking). Is the Jindalee system available for export? A bunch of these on the Lakshadweep, Andaman and Nicobar islands and potential foreign naval bases like the planned radar station in Vietnam should to the trick.:diablo: