dark light

Witcha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,232 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Witcha
    Participant

    For a naval role, isn’t the stealth capability of the F-35 undermined somewhat by the fact that it will be stationed on a platform that any radar will see a mile-sorry, 200 miles off?

    In any case, I can see gen 4.5 fighters like the Rafale M and Gripen NG still being competitive for naval use, partly because of price and partly because there are many nations with aircraft carriers that are unlikely to ever use them in a conflict.:p

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2405359
    Witcha
    Participant

    When’s the last time a USN aircraft blew apart the first time it tried to land on a carrier?

    By that logic Boeing and Northrop Grumman should forever develop all future carrier craft.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Heads up programme on Astute on BBC2 #2035193
    Witcha
    Participant

    PR is PR. If you’ve been following the threads here the Type 45s are horribly under-equipped in many aspects, and had kinks with its main missile system(PAAMS) for over two years after launch.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2405369
    Witcha
    Participant

    You know, the IAF’s original plan back in 2005 was to buy 120 more Mirage-2000s. Somehow with AK Antony’s insistence on fair and open procurement policy we came to this circus of fighters from around the world…:rolleyes:

    I wonder if Rafale’s offer is a way at poking fun at this excruciatingly slow process. Because I can’t see any Air Force seriously saying yes to ‘Sure, I’ll buy some of your stuff to tide me over before I decide whether or not your stuff is worth my money.’ The IAF’s already ordered 50 more MKIs to make up for lost squadron strength. Being ‘repeat orders’ there won’t be so many bureaucratic hurdles.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035198
    Witcha
    Participant

    I think the fact that the F-35B’s wings don’t fold for stowage may have something to do with it.

    in reply to: Heads up programme on Astute on BBC2 #2035201
    Witcha
    Participant

    I’m frankly a little surprised the British shipbuilding industry has been this successful with the Astutes but had so many problems with something they’ve had far more experience with: the destroyers.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035218
    Witcha
    Participant

    Odd. I’d heard it was 40. You got a source?

    And from that 40 it’s meant to be (at full war load) 36 F35’s and 4 helos.

    http://www.helium.com/items/1442066-queen-elizabeth-class-aircraft-carriers-of-the-royal-navy
    Among various other news sources available via googling. Thanks for the clarification. For a 65000t vessel it seems to be an ‘inefficient’ design by the traditional Western standards(1000t = 1 aircraft?).

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2405431
    Witcha
    Participant

    :eek:TAKE IT TAKE IT TAKE IT TAKE IT!

    Oh wait. Shouldn’t this be in the Navy thread?:D

    in reply to: How would you westernize the Su-33? #2035244
    Witcha
    Participant

    Westernising the Su-33… I would go the same route as the IAF and Indian Navy(for MiG-29K) did and then some.

    EL/M-2052 or Euroradar CAESAR replacing the old Phazotron N001.
    Thates Topsight-E or Elbit DASH mk4 HMDS.
    Rafael Litening II/Thales Damocles LDP
    SPECTRA active cancellation system
    The EW system from the Gripen NG, Eurofighter Tranche 3 or Rafale F3.
    Inlet radar blocker like in the F/A-18E/F
    HOTAS cockpit with MFDs from any major Western manufacturer

    All this is assuming no budget limits.:D

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2405436
    Witcha
    Participant

    Wasn’t the Su-37 Berkut a sort of technology demonstrator for the PAK-FA? That’s what I heard at the time, but this prototype looks nothing like it.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2405437
    Witcha
    Participant

    Anything wrong with that?:diablo:

    Witcha
    Participant

    While I won’t claim to have the slightest degree of technical expertise with aircraft, none of those pics show an arrestor hook.

    in reply to: Heads up programme on Astute on BBC2 #2035249
    Witcha
    Participant

    What is going on, first a program on Daring and now one on Astute? Are the government preparing us for a massive Navy spending spree so they’re pumping out lots of propaganda on the subject?

    ….I really wish they were.

    I think it’s more likely they’re trying to hype all the new systems the navy has in order to reduce the PR impact of the ones they won’t have(thanks to future cuts).:D

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2035253
    Witcha
    Participant

    Wasn’t PAAMS already operational?

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035259
    Witcha
    Participant

    The CVFs will apparently be able to carry upto 60 aircraft each. Is the exact specification of the airgroup decided yet? How many of those 60 will be fixed-wing(F-35B) for instance?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,232 total)