dark light

Stryker73

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 273 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #254812
    Stryker73
    Participant

    In the same paper where I saw that story, I saw another about another round of defense cuts and 20,000 people cut from the Army.

    Not ‘another round’ – just the latest tranche of already announced defence cuts to be fair.

    If Argentina wants it, I’m not sure the UK military could do much about it.

    Has someone magicked up a proper airforce or anything resembling an amphibious capability for Argentina whilst i’ve not been watching?

    If Argentina wants it, i’m not sure the Argentine military could do anything about it.

    With all due respect to the UK and RN, I’d bet their A-4s are more effective than the current RN Harriers. :rolleyes::D

    But fodder for Typhoons.

    Face facts, argentinas military is stuck in the 1980’s because of the politicos fear of a military coup. They have about 16 airworthy fighters and just 1 or 2 airtankers available at any one time

    in reply to: Falkland Islands Declare War… #1845432
    Stryker73
    Participant

    In the same paper where I saw that story, I saw another about another round of defense cuts and 20,000 people cut from the Army.

    Not ‘another round’ – just the latest tranche of already announced defence cuts to be fair.

    If Argentina wants it, I’m not sure the UK military could do much about it.

    Has someone magicked up a proper airforce or anything resembling an amphibious capability for Argentina whilst i’ve not been watching?

    If Argentina wants it, i’m not sure the Argentine military could do anything about it.

    With all due respect to the UK and RN, I’d bet their A-4s are more effective than the current RN Harriers. :rolleyes::D

    But fodder for Typhoons.

    Face facts, argentinas military is stuck in the 1980’s because of the politicos fear of a military coup. They have about 16 airworthy fighters and just 1 or 2 airtankers available at any one time

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2019716
    Stryker73
    Participant

    On the BBC it says…

    Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said the F35-C had hit development problems and it would be cheaper in the long term to order F35-B jump jets

    So does he know something we don’t with regards to the development of the various versions? You would hope so, given that he said the F35C wouldn’t be available till 2023.

    So it looks like the adaptable design that we were all sold with has turned out to be a load of claptrap.

    I missed the statement and the replay isn’t up on the BBC yet, if his advisors were anything like competent he must have mentioned that in response to the undoubted shellacking he got from the opposition benches.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2023879
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Is everybody taking the DT story as fact then?

    Because clearly the £488m is just the cost of EMALS. What if the British government also knows that the story about the CVF being easily convertable was a load of old baloney? Not to mention the BAE fees in converting it!

    If the US is so concerned about the UK getting it, perhaps they could send us some of their military aid!

    in reply to: UK back in for the F35B? #2295712
    Stryker73
    Participant

    UK should settle with 35.000 ton class carrier with F-35B (and Merlins), without premature retirement of Harriers and Invincible class carriers.

    Less of the drama, the steel is cheap and they are both already being built. They actually require less manpower than the Invincibles, It’s the cost of the planes that is the big problem. I wonder if the government have found out the real cost of regaining CATOBAR skills and changing the CVF’s design is going to be too much.

    I actually believe a switch to ‘B’ would make sense for what the UK wants to do with the carriers as well as see both CVF in service.

    CVF’s are actually being built with no problems at all, the mess of this program is entirely political with specs being changed constantly due to a change of government.

    in reply to: UK considers Rafale and F-18 as 'interim aircraft' #2356280
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Forget JSF completely and get into a joint venture with Saab to work on the Gripen successor.

    So drop the massive economic benefits of JSF to the UK and splash out money we don’t have on R&D for a naval fighter from scratch? :confused:

    in reply to: UK considers Rafale and F-18 as 'interim aircraft' #2356565
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Unlikely ? Its impossible. Especially after Cameron-Sarko clash few months ago .

    Nonsense #1 – you must have missed the joint UK/FR battle group announcement recently. It wont happen but it isn’t impossible.

    Maybe the UK should get this farce over with and just unload the hulls to France and Brazil respectively, use the cash to further flesh out those capabilities it can actually afford.

    Nonsense #2 – as if France or Brazil can afford it anymore than the UK ontop of current spending. The UK Government has recently called CVF the centrepiece of its future plans, indeed you’ll find the army is cut further to fund it.

    It’s not like those gators are going anywhere without cover from Uncle Sam.

    Nonsense #3, unless you don’t think the UK is capable of putting destroyers, frigates & SSN’s together in a group. In which case neither Brazil or France can either.

    in reply to: Here we go more cuts #2361474
    Stryker73
    Participant

    These aren’t ‘extra’ or ‘more’ cuts, just another tranche of already announced reductions to come.

    in reply to: Is the UK getting cold feet? #2366684
    Stryker73
    Participant

    The change to CATOBAR has given them more fall back options though so imo CATOBAR was the right choice.

    I think people are also forgetting the UK industrial payback with F35.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2029281
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Report already rubbished by the government.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2029283
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Governments official position

    Both the National Audit
    Office and Public Accounts Committee today published reports on the MOD’s
    Carrier Strike capability. Several media sources have reported on inaccurate
    claims that a full Carrier Strike capability will not be achieved until
    2030.

    This is not true. The more capable Carrier variant of the Joint Strike
    Fighter fast jet will begin operating from our aircraft carrier from 2020, with
    six UK jets available for operations. By 2023, this number will increase to 12
    UK jets onboard and we will be able to work with our allies to increase that
    number because of the interoperability that the Carrier variant Joint Strike
    Fighter allows.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2029349
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Don’t forget the NAO is purely the countrys financial watchdog. Their whole reason for existing is to judge ‘value for money’.

    I mean come on, ‘EMALS is risky and ‘untried’ technology’. Reporting this as though its a negative. It would suit the NAO better if the carriers had sails, less cost 😉

    in reply to: U.S. To Buy Decommissioned British Harriers #2329971
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Try reading the link

    If the USMC ever fly GR.9’s i’m a Dutchman.

    in reply to: U.S. To Buy Decommissioned British Harriers #2330249
    Stryker73
    Participant

    Yeap the $50 million is for the spares, the aircraft deal should be known this week from the sounds of it.

    Unless i’ve got things wrong the aircraft ARE the spares. The USMC won’t fly them, just cannibalise them for parts.

    As for the price, they’re just like antiques…. only worth what someone will pay for them.

    in reply to: U.S. To Buy Decommissioned British Harriers #2330508
    Stryker73
    Participant

    hahaha the US sold a paper plane to the UK for billions, and bought a good number of perfectly useful planes for 50 million.

    With friends like these the UK don’t need enemies.

    Nic

    They won’t fly them, they’ll use the spare parts. Is your PC worth anywhere near what you initially paid for it? Silly argument really.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 273 total)