I think that with US, they certainly don’t have the best trained crews as proved in numerous exercises, with Allies and then this one with India, and arguably the F-15 is no longer the best, however what makes USAF or USN so strong is their C4 capabilities, tactics and sheer numbers.
who said the F-14D is NOT a good modern fighter? With the Phoenix, it can probably smack around just about anything in BVR like it did in Iraq-Iran war. The upgraded Mig-31BM/M will give ANY fighter a run for it’s money when it starts smacking them around with R-37s and R-77s at BVR. Even when it’s at a higher altitude it also has even a bigger advantage. The F-14A proved itself in Iraq-Iran war at how effective it was. There was NEVER probably in history where an interceptor was more effective than the F-14A in Iraq-Iran war.
Also why do you say “typical of communism”? What does it have anything to do having a specialized interceptor for destroying bombers and cruise missiles on Russia’s vast North?
Obviously the Mig-31BM/M is not a great dogfighter, but why can’t it be a good fighter and not just an anti-bomber/cruise missile defence? It can carry R-33/37/M and of course the the R-77.
I doubt it’s exactly stalled in development because anything technical rather than lack of funds for now. Considering Mi-8s can serve for some more time.
Depends for what mission you want to compare them for. Obviously they were both designed for diffferent roles.
It’s actually funny that the SU-30Ks did not simulate the R-77, but the R-27 only. I don’t even think they can carry it. I know Su-30MKs and MKIs can, but I doubt Ks can, though I am pretty sure that they enver simulated the R-77 even if they could.
And also the Su-30K is just a souped up standard Su-27, and not much. This article is bunch of crap.
Yes, I think large countries that need to protect vast areas of airspace where GCI support is very low. Countries like Canada, US, Russia, Taiwan, Brazil and others would be suitable for this sort of thing, of course countries like Brazil or Canada would not need anything similar.
I think Taiwan could use something like the Mig-31 to protect it’s vast airspace and corridors around it where Chinese fighters will be intruding all over the place.
Yes but I am just not sure about if the Mig-31 is actually worth it. Against something like an Su-35 it holds no significant advantages in terms of payload, number of hardpoints, it’s just much faster and can fly higher. If you wish you can integrate something like the R-37/M onto a Flanker you can pay the Russians to do it. Mig-31M’s Zaslon-M is not that much better than the multirole N011M
The real disadvantage is that the Mig-31 is probably much more expensive to operate than the already expensive Flankers, just consider Mig-31’s running costs/h, it has almost twice as bigger fuel load than the Flanker which already has a large fuel load. Mig-31B’s fuel load is something like a 16350kgs. It also seems more complicated therefore more expensive to run. It’s on top of all probably a lot more expensive to buy.
But why not use the AID somewhere else where they can get more?
What about other GPS like the European Galileo or the Russian GLONASS? Does US have control over those?
120mn for used P-3Cs? Wow thats is HELL of a ripoff, I don’t get it. Why not just go to Europe and get a few CN-235MPAs for about 35mn, they are very capable ASW aircraft?
Yes but when you look at F-35’s payload and range, it certainly cannot match the F-111. However when you considering attaching a really long range cruise missile on it like JASSM then it can strike pretty far.
Yes, the Krypton is much lighter, has 3 times lower range and is a high flying supersonic the whole way, the Club is a sea skimmer thats subsonic for most of it’s flight profile before it speeds up to m2.5 for last 20 or more kms before it’s target. BIG difference.
Actually the air launched club is a subsonic sea skimmer until last 20kms it speeds to m2.5. I think with a 1600kg launch weight, a Mig-29M/K/SMT should be able to carry 2 comfortably, depending though on it’s hardpoints load. Their max payloads are something around 5500 & 5000kg. I highly doubt they’d be able to accomodate more than 2.
The Rafale seems to have a better radar than the Typhoon. They have similar payload, similar # of hardpoints, similar range and etc, however I seem to like Typhoon’s weapons somewhat. I really like the Meteor much more than the much shorter ranged MICA, and I really like Brimstone and a few others.
I would not say that either of them are more expensive than the other, their costs are similar.