I do’t know what is the cost of the J-8F. The problem of the BVR J-7 is that you would have to incur an additional development cost whereas the J-8F no longer does. And that is not all to the J-8F. Although it won’t be as maneuverable as the BVR J-7, it still has greater range from carrying 4200 to 4500kg of fuel, and much larger payload, as much as 4500kg. Furthermore, if you’re using the -21MF style nosecone, the J-8II antenna size would have it beat easy, not to mention the J-8II allows for more electronics on the back of the antenna, which helps you add more functionality to the radar.
Grafting the F-16 style nose and inlet onto the J-7 ala F-7MF would amount to quite some development work. Even if they did, they won’t use a Kopyo style radar on it—it would be something bigger, like the Zhuk-M. In fact the whole idea of the F-7MF was to put a J-10 class radar on it.
True, but the J-8F would be significantly more expensive to run and probably buy. Though what do you think of the putting something like the little redesigned J-7FS, with the F-8 Crusader style intake and such and in there it would be perfect for a Kopyo-F style radar. And I am not talking about the single seat version, but using a twin seat version too for training and such of pilots before they move onto more advanced version. Besides being a twin seat trainer, it could fill in quite a few combat roles such as simple Air Defense, Anti-Shipping(put on Kh-35s on it), CAS & Light Strike.
Any more sources on the total costs?
So in total its 900mn for the 18 aircraft + 145mn + 20mn for the avionics=1.065bn which equals to approx 59.1mn for the aircraft.
I think the Chinese would be buying the Tu-22M5 for Anti-Shipping reasons, not just for conventional land attack, because they already have a lot of platforms that can strike Taiwan. What they need is someting like the Kh-32 or whatever and a good platform to carry it.
Is there really a big need for another good dogfighting missile? I’d rather concentrate on much longer ranged BVR missile and ramjet tech.
It uses existing facilities and tooling too for one thing. But it may also be a bit short ranged. Chengdu won’t certainly go for a round inlet MiG-21 to get a BVR J-7 that is for sure—they already made clear their direction on this with the F-7MF. We don’t know what these airframe changes would affect the overall cost. The problem of a 5-7m BVR J-7 fighter cheapie is that the J-8F (Kunlun-2 engines, SD-10 capable radar) can do this now with not much upfront development cost and time.
And it appears that the PLAAF won’t go with the F-7MF anymore, and even the FC-1 is still a 50-50 chance. J-10 and Sues will be the mainstay with J-7G and J-8F rounding up the legacy end.
Well yes but what is the estimated cost of the J-8F?
Also what makes this BVR J-7 attractive is it’s cost, and as you said it’s very cheap to operate. It could be used in unlimited training(twin seat JL-7 and used for training for other platforms too) while it’s supersonic, it could be armed for strike and of course CAS missions(put in some ATGMs on it like Vikhr) and it could be a nice supersonic multirole and Air Defense fighter for some 5-7mn that would be able to stand up nicely to alot of the current 4th gen fighters. This is basically like a new and furtherly improved Mig-21-93.
dont think anyone is likely to express interest in a BVR J7 now that the FC1 is up and flying.
Well what makes it attractive is that it’s much cheaper. The BVR J-7 would cost at most some 5-6mn, while the FC-1 at around 15-20, 3-4 times more.
AUSTRALIA
22 Tiger ARH @ AUS$1.3 billion (approx. USD$935 million)
Ok, corrected. I must’ve missed to convert from AUS to USD.
Srbin, the Y8F600 will be a lot more expensive than a base Y8. It’s still in development and it will have PW engines and western composite six-blade propellers and western avionics and a new load delivery system that will reduce the flight crew to only two people. It will be in excess of $20mn at the very least.
Ok, I will correct that too.
Here is a good selling one that you forgot
J-7P/PG – $2-4mn (reports from Pakistani F-7 deals)
Actually, I gotta dig up the deal because it was much more for the MG and PG or whatever. I remember having the price but I never put it into the list.
THat RMAF Flanker is $75M aircraft with total systems. IAF deal for 40 Su-30 was signed in 1996 dollar for $1.8B(Not including foreign components). You cannot compare it with 2003 Malaysian deal. A Single MKI will be $80M per aircraft in todays prices. Also Brazil Su-35 is 12 aircraft for $760M. So it is around $70M. It is cheaper because it doesnot involve foreign components.
Actually, it was 900mn for 18 planes + 2 more contracts. Can you list the prices of those two.
Also, the Su-35 was offered to Brazil for some 35mn, it is unsure how many aircraft Brazil will want.
Small enhancement for the L-159.. The figure you have written goes for the L-159A attacker, the L-159B trainer is offered for a significantly lower price due to lack of radar..
The official slogan for L-159B by Aero Vodochody calls:
$8.5mil plus a tank of gas
Ok, thanks I will correct it.
Ok guys, I think we’ll need many more adjustments. I have edited the front page.
What happend to the Mig-23-98 upgrade? Did it ever go through and is it still offered?
Kopyo is too big for the J-7G, and for the planes that can fit it, China has no plans of upgrading the J-7C/D and the J-8E further than the radars they already have, which is the JL-7A radar also AKA known as the Type 226. The best these planes could shoot is a PL-8. Only FC-1 could fit Kopyo but the current radar specs being asked for the FC-1 exceeds that, which is why the Grifo S-7, Thales RC-400 and a KLJ type radar being ground tested. China appears to have at least two Kopyo sets for evaluation.
J-7 program is already at a shoestring budget, or they would have gone through with the F-7MF program where you can jam a 700mm antenna right up the plane’s nose. And if they need a small dogfight only radar, why should you even bother to import one? We’re only talking about a simple radar here with the dogfight modes (e.g. boresight, vertical scan) with RWS.
Yes, but I am just saying hypothetically that if a customer wants a J-7G airframe and Russian avionics in it. The Kopyo-M has a diameter of some 500mm I believe, while the Kopyo-F(which is still in development) is said to have a 440mm diameter. It’s volume is also much smaller(160dm3) compared to the bigger volume of the Kopyo-M(230dm3). I mean if the Kopyo-F is intended to fit in the tail of the Su-35 then I am sure it will be able to be somehow squeezed into the nose of the J-7G.
Or why not get something like the J-7FS with the F-8 Crusader style nose and intake?
Well, I was just asking how you think it might perform as an Air Defense fighter given how Mig-21-93 performed in recent exercises against F-15s IF it was armed with something like with lets say Kopyo-F and R-77 and various Russian avionics, or Israeli ones are an option too. I mean it’d be 5mn BVR capability. You might as well customize it with other things too like HMS+R073, and etc. The Chinese could very well deliver the bare airframe with engines and such for maybe 2-3mn and the avionics and weapons and such would cost more.
Yes but are even the latest J-7s as trainers able to simulate the J-10 in anyway?
Also Crobato, what do you think of arming someting like J-7G with latest Russian or Israeli avionics, radar(like Kopyo-F) and various weapons AA weapons like R-77 or Derby and some lighter A2G weapons mostly for CAS and such and not some heavy strike due to it’s limited payload and range? How do you think it might be able to compete in the BVR arena? Of course you could probably squeeze all of this in around 5mn, very cheap for a BVR supersonic fighter.
Yes, just no one can really afford an Arms race with Brazil, I mean it’s population and GDP is much bigger than any country around it.
Those pics are not very good.
I checked up sites and some claim they have 20, 18 single seaters and 2 twin seaters.