dark light

Skymonster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ryanair On Panorama BBC1 Monday 12th Oct (Merged) #515392
    Skymonster
    Participant

    The programme set out to rubbish Ryanair, and in my humble opinion failed. So who is trying to rubbish Ryanair and why,I wish I knew.

    I don’t think that the program rubbished Ryanair – I’m not even sure it set out to do so, although given other TV programs have tried to do so in the past it was not unreasonable to assume that Panorama might try to do the same. Actually, what we ended up with was, IMHO, a fairly balanced view of Ryanair that presented the good/positives and the bad/negatives, laid some truth on the line and explained how the airline works, didn’t really labour either good or bad unjustifiably, and left the viewer to make their own mind up.

    Anyone who says that the program was biased against Ryanair maybe, IMHO, looking at the airline through rose tinted glasses, tinted maybe by the fact that sometimes very cheap fares overrides all other issues that Ryanair creates.

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair On Panorama BBC1 Monday 12th Oct (Merged) #515418
    Skymonster
    Participant

    SKYMONSTER, Who do you fly with?

    In the last year, I have flown with:

    bmi (mainline/regional) – 5 sectors
    bmibaby – 5 sectors
    KLM – 1 sector
    Lufthansa – 29 sectors
    Singapore Airlines – 4 sectors
    Turkish Air – 1 sector
    United Airlines – 16 sectors

    I also have at least 8 more sectors on United Airlines, at least 2 more on Lufthansa, and 2 on TAP Portugal booked/confirmed before the end of the year – I guess I’m a bit of a Star Alliance sort of person! ๐Ÿ˜‰

    As you can see, I am not TOTALLY averse to the low-fare sector having done 5 sectors on WW this past twelve months (I live near EMA and where needs must / no other sensible choice, except Ryanair that I absolutely refuse to fly with under any circumstances). And before you try to claim its easy for me to go with the “full-service” airlines, I’d point out that the flying I do is not necessarily on my employers money – all the remaining UA flights I have this year are paid for by myself, and all of the bmibaby flights were work-related so paid for by the company.

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair On Panorama BBC1 Monday 12th Oct (Merged) #515427
    Skymonster
    Participant

    :rolleyes:

    Have a look through the Ryanair topics on PPRuNe! ๐Ÿ˜€

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair On Panorama BBC1 Monday 12th Oct (Merged) #515431
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Do you mean MICHAEL O’LEARY:diablo:

    No I didn’t. I know what I meant… :dev2:

    I detect a slight (?) anti-Irish feeling in this whole Ryanair debate. How dare an Irishman run one of the most successful airlines in the world?

    Not at all… My hating Ryanair (and never ever flying with them) is well known and well documented and has nothing to do with where the airline comes from. I hate Ryanair, and in general I dislike most other low fare airlines, but that’s not a race issue. My hate/dislike comes from having worked in the industry for many years and having seen what they’ve done to the business, and is primarily related to the low-fare sector’s way of working and their business practices, with Ryanair being at the very most distasteful end of the low-fare business.

    Can’t wait to hear what Andy (a.k.a Skymonster) has to say…

    OK… :rolleyes: I was rather underwhelmed – it really didn’t tell anyone much that we didn’t already know. I’m surprised that Scumbag O’Riley got so worked up about it – on the whole, I don’t think it painted Ryanair in a particularly bad light at all. In fact, it seemed to me to be a fairly well balanced view of Ryanair – yes the service etc isn’t great, yes you might get stung for more money than you thought, but yes often it will be cheap(-ish) and they’ll usually get you somewhere near(-ish) to where you want to go fairly safely and fairly punctually.

    Certainly there were issues of concern expressed by the program in a rather light-weight way – examples being pilot pre-flight preparation time, cabin crew who’s motivation and reason for being seems to be more about selling butties than safety (and that’s certainly not appropriate prioritisation of focus), “hidden” charges, and touching on baggage foul ups at STN.

    I don’t know what I expected from the program – it was certainly never billed as a big expose of the airline. I guess it was interesting in a harmless sort of way, and whilst it managed to convince me that my choice never ever to fly with them is the right one (for me!), I doubt Panorama has done anything to put the great unwashed (and by that I mean relatively niave of the real issues) ๐Ÿ˜‰ off of flying Ryanair.

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair On Panorama BBC1 Monday 12th Oct (Merged) #515631
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Seems like Mikey the Pikey is getting a bit upset about this Panorama program :p Statements on the airline’s website, whinging about not getting his say, etc. :rolleyes: No smoke without fire I say :diablo: And Panorama aren’t making programs about other airlines! ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    Andy

    in reply to: US Airways selling 10 Jungle jets #516072
    Skymonster
    Participant

    ERJ-145 has always been known as the “Jungle Jet” round our ways – the large E-170/E-190 just being “E-jet”s or “170”s/”190″s… On the other hand, in the US I’ve heard the ERJ-145 called a “lawn dart” sometimes… IMHO “Jungle Jet” isn’t meant to be particularly derogatory – it just refers to the fact that they come from Brasil, and that in Brasil there’s somewhat more jungle than there is in countries where most other airliners are manufactured (e.g. France, Germany, Canada, US North West…). On the other hand, if we keep calling them “Jungle Jets” I guess we’ll have to start referring to the events in Rio in 2016 as the “Jungle Games” ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: Boeing 747-800 delayed again! #516204
    Skymonster
    Participant

    On September 15th – and lets not forget that’s only three weeks ago – Boeing’s 748 program manager said that the first one would fly in the Fall 09 and indeed he aimed to have THREE 748s in the air by year end:

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2009866995_boeing15.html

    Now – none! How things change in three weeks.

    I’m forced to conclude that the planning monkies at Boeing haven’t got a clue! Boeing seems determined not to fly any new designs this year!

    Andy

    in reply to: British Airways to charge for advance seat selection #518048
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I know that if I’d just shelled out two grand or more on a club world ticket to the US, I’d be mighty p**sed off that they wanted another sixty quid each way so that I could chose a seat! Mind you, seeing as I don’t travel BA, its largely irrelevent to me.

    Andy

    in reply to: Plan on table to split JAL in two #518398
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I suppose that they could call the two airlines “Japan Air Lines” and “Japan Air System” (or even “Toa Domestic Airways”!!!” :rolleyes:

    in reply to: United's final 737 flight set for Oct. 28 #518460
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I should think the suits at Airbus would be salivating over this news ๐Ÿ™‚

    Not yet… 737s retired largely as a result of downsizing / route cutbacks, and replacement by RJ (CR7/Emb170) flying. UA have an RFI out for 150 new narrow bodies, but no decision as yet – and in any case, IIRC that RFI is largely around a 757 replacement

    Andy

    in reply to: Has anyone flown with Continental? #518464
    Skymonster
    Participant

    http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Continental_Airlines/Continental_Airlines_Boeing_757-200_I.php

    just avoid the yellow and especially the red seats!!!

    I flew their 757 trans-Atlantic a couple of years ago and they were decidedly average – neither better, nor worse, than the other US carriers. These days I’d chose United over Continental every time if travelling economy, primarily because of UA’s economy plus product that’s available free to their fequent flyers (which includes me then! :p ).

    Andy

    in reply to: bmi A321's and A320's #519383
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Latest “rumour”…

    * All BMI A321s to Lufthansa over the next few months (inc mid-haul/ex-BMED and no BD charters next summer)
    * Lufthansa parked A300-600Rs to go to BMI for midhaul/replace A321s
    * ex-BMI A321s at Lufthansa release Lufthansa 737-300s to bmibaby, firstly to replace scheduled lease returns at WW this winter
    * Mid term, ex-Lufthansa 737-300s released as a result of further A32x and Bombardier C-series deliveries to LH also to WW
    * Longer term, WW (maybe rebranded, but esssetially LH-low fare airline) gets all 60+ ex LH 737 classics!!

    A

    in reply to: UAL: highway to hell? #519539
    Skymonster
    Participant

    UA have always looked after me pretty well on many trans-Atlantic trips I’ve done this last three years. In dozens of round trips, I’ve had one missed connection in LAX when I was travelling SFO-LAX-LHR but UA provided hotel, taxis from/to and meals so no complaints there, one cancelled flight SFO-LAX on another occasion when UA pro-actively rebooked me to Burbank and arranged a taxi for me to LAX without me having to ask, and one missed baggage connection in IAD going to DFW but UA went out of their way to get the bag to me soonest. And as far as I’m concerned, UA’s Mileage Plus frequent flyer program works really well too. Given the choice, I would ALWAYS chose UA over LH (and I’ve flown LH more than UA unfortunately).

    in reply to: easyJet major reductions, incl. EMA hub closure #520737
    Skymonster
    Participant

    A real class act is Ryanair… :rolleyes: NOT!

    http://www.ryanair.com/site/EN/news.php?yr=09&month=sep&story=gen-en-030909-2

    โ€œRyanair will ensure that the very few Easyjet passengers who were misguided enough to book Easyjet flights to/from East Midlands Airport can travel with Ryanair to Alicante, Barcelona (Girona), Faro and Malaga. Easyjet passengers can book these rescue fares for only ยฃ35 including taxes and charges…”

    One wonders about all the passengers who were “misguided enough to book Ryanair flights from/to Manchester Airport…”? Oh, of course, silly me, I forgot – it was Manchester Airport that was misguided, not Ryanair, in that case!!! :p

    Really, I cannot comprehend why anyone with any morals would want to do business with Scumbag O’Riley’s airline ๐Ÿ˜ก

    Andy

    in reply to: easyJet major reductions, incl. EMA hub closure #520761
    Skymonster
    Participant

    EMA deserves what it gets! :diablo: If you dance with the devil… :rolleyes:

    There’ll be a fair few concerned folks in the EMA management office after the easyJet announcement… ๐Ÿ˜€

    The introduction of one Jet2 757 next Spring doing mainly mid-haul leisure destinations (DLM, LPA, SSH etc) hardly compensates for a three A319 base doing short haul. With the future of bmibaby hardly assured right now given the Lufthansa acquisition of the bmi group and baby’s future being reviewed, EMA are rather in Ryanair’s pocket all of a sudden. And of course, when Scumbag O’Riley’s me come a looking for cost reductions… ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    Andy

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,877 total)