I believe SIXC is safe and will continue the good work of feeding the hungry of Baginton
The above suggests otherwise… Unless of course they’re going to leave G-SIXC at Coventry and move G-APSA down there and set up a duplicate diner.
The resounding silence from the Classic Aircraft Trust not explaining their plans (considering they’re meant to be opening up at St.Mawgan in August) is very disappointing, especially for us who have supported them in their various guises for years.
Podgy -the family unit doesnt consider Coventry a tourist attraction of choice! However a family on holiday will often choose a different attraction i.e like Flambards as was for a day out -such would be the attraction of Cornwall.
Enthusiasts despite what they might think are a tiny part of the revenue for a museum.
Well I’m an enthusiast who visits Airbase several times a year, buys pleasure flights when I’m there,and through being a member of the Classic Flight Club and donating each month give them far more money each and every year than a “family unit” on holiday is likely to do. I appreciate that I am only one thought. But I really can’t see the point of me carrying on doing that when they’re 300 miles away rather than 40. Whilst I like to give something back I do need some engagement and it’s not going to happen for me at St.Mawgan. Enthusiasts may not give much, but they’re more likely to provide repeat business, and income especially in the barren winter months. Not me anymore, when Airbase goes to Cornwall I fin somewhere else for my money to go.
Andy
All will become clear in a week or 2.
All needs to become clear a bit sooner than that as far as I’m concerned… I accept that those of us who’ve supported ClassicFlight / CAT with regular monthly payments only help in a small way but I was very disappointed to first learn about the move from the BBC. I’ve no idea whether the economics are likely to better for the trust being near a seaside resort thats busy for a number of weeks each year, but is physically very far removed from the majority of enthusiasts and air shows. But living in the Midlands, the Trust couldn’t suddenly become much more remote for me than St.Mawgan and the move certain makes me consider whether I want to continue my support or whether I might better give the money to another organisation.
No VC10s at Brunty last weekend – so all four must have been chopped
Andy
For sure it seemed that they wanted one (was even put in writing in a newsletter) and were even talking of flying it, but as to why it fell through – only hearsay on the why part, but some issue around being able to do a thorough inspection was what i was told though whether the sellers or buyers were the obstacle I don’t know
I certainly hope the thread isn’t closed – if it offends people here in historic, maybe it can be moved elsewhere (general aviation perhaps). As someone who watched “The Galloping Ghost” crash – albeit from a distance – I really need to understand more about what I saw happen. I’ve watched the videos, and I’ll watch others that surface – and its not morbid curiosity. I doubt I will ever forget seeing “The Galloping Ghost” flying into the ground very close to the grandstand, at about 80 degrees nose down and going very fast. Aeroplanes don’t normally do that I saw something I didn’t expect to see and don’t fully understand, and the discussions and videos help me rationalise what I saw. Some will say ‘wait for the report’ but I don’t really want to do that… As a GA pilot, my type of flying has no relationship to air racing nor is our aeroplane anything like a Mustang, but since I’ve seen the images you can be damned sure I’ll be taking a closer look at the elevator trim tab when I fly our aeroplane tomorrow. Discussing and watching sheds some light on what I saw from a distance, and gives me a little reassurance that I’m unlikely to end up plowing into the ground myself when I fly.
Mike Collett was hoping to acquire one of these but there were problems with the acquisition earlier this year. I believe that there is still interest…
Andy
Why am I reminded of a group of rubber-neckers stood around a car crash debating how the wheel came off which then caused the car to slam into a bus stop full of people?
In over 30 years, 2200 flights, 500 hours PIC, countless airshows and other events, 100000s of pictures… the demise of “The Galloping Ghost” was the first time I’ve seen a fatal air crash actually occur.
I love air racing and the people involved, I’ve been to Reno each of the last few years, and every day safety was mentioned – every day at the media briefing, safety was ephasised – every day, we were reminded about safety and told where we could and couldn’t go for the sake of safety. And ever since I witnessed the accident I’ve been hoping that it wasn’t some stupid oversight that caused what happened, because that would probably be the end of the Reno races as we know them now. Even so, I’m not yet sure whether I could go back again even if the races keep going – not because of concern about my own safety, but because I don’t want to see another fatal accident, particularly if it was to be proven this one was avoidable.
Thus, whilst I know that there’s no real clarity until the NTSB reports, having watched Jimmy’s last flight to the end too (albeit from much further away than did Dave, on the other side of the course), I think it helps me rationalise what happened by looking at the photos, watching the videos, and reading and discussing the thinking on what caused it – firstly with friends in Reno, and on the forums now I’m home.
God bless Jimmy and all of those who died anyway…

Andy
Well the CofG would have moved slightly when the trim tab came off! :diablo:
Other than that and as a result of the consumption of fuel, it isn’t going to move though.
I also want to add, for anyone questioning the safety of the event, that there’s a huge focus on safety throughout, from planning right through to sterile ramps during races and the FAA and NTSB being on site throughout monitoring the event. The grandstands are way further away from the race than [say] the granstands are at RIAT, and the forward vector of the race planes DOES NOT come close to the crowd – the section of the course closest to the crowd is pretty much straight, with the inward turns completed well before that section of the course – in fact, by the time they pass the grandstand they’re starting to turn away. An aircraft that departs radically from it’s intended flight path – whether mechanical or pilot incapacity induced – can go anywhere, and it can happen at any event. Its sad that it happened near the grandstands – the reality is that it could have happened out on most of the rest of the course and killed no one but the pilot. I don’t believe you can truly legislate for the event that occurred without stopping the racing. None the less, even having seen the crash, I don’t view the Reno races as unsafe im any way and I sincerely hope that they continue.
I don’t normally post on Key these days (an issue over on civil aviation) so ive only just come across this thread.
Firstly, I’m so glad this forum hasn’t defended into the armchair expert’s “age of the pilot” crap that’s all over the thread on UKAR…
Anyhows…
Local radio news are now saying that nine are dead including the pilot – that’s a tragedy, but*it’s better than the 12 dead that was being wrongly reported yesterday by un-informed TV media.* The races are now cancelled for the rest of the weekend – we are not being allowed onto the airfield at all as the NTSB has taken over the site for it’s investigation and they won’t allow any non-essential persons onto the airport.
*
When the accident happened I was a way over the other side of the course photographing the race planes going around one of the pylons, but I*just happened to*glance*over to the grandstand / ramp area of the airport and saw the aircraft diving*it’s last 100 feet or so into the ground almost vertically – at about 80 degrees to the horizon.*A huge cloud of debris and dirt then shot up into the air. It dived in so vertically and so fast I just knew it was going to be a fatal…* The aircraft*came very very close to hitting the huge public grandstands, and so I think it’s a miracle more people weren’t killed.
I’ve seen accidents / crashes before, but never a fatal – and for me, having been around aeroplanes for 30 years or more and being a pilot too, it’s not something I ever wanted to see, nor do I want to see again.* I very nearly didn’t go on the bus onto the other side of course yesterday afternoon as there was a fairly heavy cloud cover coming in and I wasn’t sure I’d get any good pictures of the racing – had I not gone out, I might well have been a lot closer to the accident, maybe even closer than I’d have cared to be.
*
Jimmy Leeward was a really nice guy – I spoke to him a couple of times this year and several last year, and it seemed it was never too much trouble for him to talk, or be photographed.* God speed all those who died, condolences to their families, and wishing those still in hospital a speedy recovery.
What, no pics of the Skyvan!!!??? Dammit, that was my favourite! Despite the Skyvan’s omission, seriously, the Ark was magnificent – especially doing touch and gos on the canal on Friday afternoon… And the guy who owns it – an absolutle gentleman 😉
Anyway, interesting pics and thanks for sharing… Sad to see the ding to the Pitts (the S38 also hit a hangar door Thursday night too, but only sustained a minor dent to the very tip of upper leading edge and was able to continue flying). I never even saw F-BULT – mind you, the aeroplanes were spread out quite a bit and I was doing other things (photos in a week or so all being well)…
I still think the next one should be called “Smashing Baby”!!!
They’ll probably steal that idea like they did when I suggested on PPRuNe they call G-TOYI “Geordie Baby”… Next thing I know, the damned thing was indeed called “Geordie Baby”! And they don’t even fly to Newcastle, but someone got the idea!
Andy
A380 was moving, CRJ was stopped. Air France to blame – end of. Commander is ALWAYS responsible for the safety of the aeroplane.
Now, there could be faults with the layout of the apron and taxiways, ATC may have cleared the A380 to taxi incorrectly, or the CRJ pilot may not have complied with instructions or procedures associated with parking on the ramp… Those extenuating circumstances may have increased the likelihood of a collision. But, the A380 bumped into the CRJ and no amount of bad design, duff ATC instructions or failure to comply by other pilots absolved a commander from ALWAYS ensuring his aeroplane is bei g operated safely. On the ground – if in doubt, stop.
Andy
Why does it say Jet2H.
They’ve found the “olidays” letters now! :rolleyes:
Andy