dark light

Skymonster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,877 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 5N-FNA,First Nation A320 at Glasgow 11-04-2011 #493910
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Doesn’t that make -FNA Second Nation Air? And presumably -FNC Third Nation Air?

    Nice catch anyway – I wonder how long they’ll last?

    Andy

    in reply to: A weekend at home (Glasgow) #494098
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Nice pics..

    5N-FNB depd GLA 1516 and came over EMA at 1545 today. -FNC is due into GLA later tonight.

    Andy

    in reply to: PA-28 Landing at East Midlands Airport #414466
    Skymonster
    Participant

    1. The Donair aircraft – and the East Midlands Flying School aircraft prior to that – are well looked after and reliable. TonyT should know – and I can verify having flown them for 15 years! If they were being badly mishandled they’d not be as reliable as they are

    2. Flying at a major airport with jet traffic doesn’t always allow for GA-style circuits and bimbling down a slow close-to-glide approach. ATC can and does sometmes require wide bases, and if there’s jet traffic inbound the best way to get in can be to fly a fairly fast and flatfish approach. Again, I know from experience. We have no idea what ATC asked of the instructor for this approach, but it’s not a particularly unusual approach for East Midlands

    3. The runway is getting on for 10000′ and the video flight vacated at “M” which is a good 8000′ from the threshold. Plus there’s the taxi back to Donair. Plenty of time for cooling for a non-turbo

    Hamham500 – glad you enjoyed your trial lesson. Don’t be put off. East Midlands and Donair are great places to learn and fly – in some respects far better than flying from a small GA airport amongst the yokels!
    Andy

    in reply to: New Baby Scheme #487389
    Skymonster
    Participant

    For Mash Get Smash

    Guess where the idea for the head of the baby came from? 😉

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/570000/images/_572903_smash300.jpg

    Andy

    in reply to: Virgin America… #494380
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I’m amazed they’ve put the high-res images online – mind you, Virgin is another of those organisations who regard any publicity as good publicity. Mind you, most of the high res images are fairly poor – mis-aligned verticals, rather noisy and they’ve left DSLR-style dust spots on them!

    Andy

    in reply to: Airliner Seats not Airline Seats #488422
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Try contacting Air Salvage International at Kemble:

    http://www.airsalvage.co.uk/index.asp

    They may have what you want…

    http://www.airsalvage.co.uk/richtext.asp?page_id=5&content_id=233

    “We sale all types of flight decks removed and cut as required, in addition to selling aircr PAX doors complete with frames. We have a very large selection of redundant cabin interior parts such as trolleys, overhead luggage bins, passenger seats, side walls, oxy fall outs for your training needs or film props”

    Andy

    in reply to: Southwest Airlines flight suffers hole in roof #488937
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Sounds like a lot of flights over a short time leading to one clapped-out B737, in my view.

    Tell that to easyJet! One of their 737-700s (G-EZKG I think) was off to Kemble today for part out. Seven years old and more valuable as spares than as a worki g aircraft!

    Andy

    in reply to: Southwest Airlines flight suffers hole in roof #489375
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Doesn’t seem like a lot of cycles…but they do add up quickly in short haul service.

    Classics are Certified for 75000 cycles I believe, but since the Aloha incident additional detailed airframe inspections are required periodically after 48000 cycles. I guess that this number might come down if this incident proves to have similar causes.

    Southwest have been fined for maintenance violations and investigated by the Feds several times for maintenance irregularities in the last few years. I hope that this is not another case of oversight or omission. No point in criticising Southwest yet though, as it hasn’t been made clear whether Southwest has been doing all it should have been doing according to the maintenance schedule and the grounding of 79 737s is primarily out of concern that other members of the fleet might have similar undetected problems, or whether there has been another irregularity in the airline’s maintenance regime.

    Andy

    Andy

    in reply to: Another FR charge on the way…! #489376
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Chaps – please don’t use insulting terms to refer to identifiable individuals.

    Strictly speaking, it’s a breach of Item 5 of the Code of Conduct.

    Thanks,

    GA

    Not gonna happen in this case Grey – I’ve always referred to him as such on his forum (without previous censorship), and always will… Search the forum for that word and you’ll find it’s been used many many times before. If you’re determined on this you’re going to need moderate a lot of old topics, and moderate each time the subject of Ryanair comes up in future.

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #489790
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Yeah, well, it seems to me that tommyinyork has a stunning career ahead of him as an industrial relations manager! :rolleyes: NOT! 😀

    Andy

    in reply to: Ryanair to offer child free flights from October #489792
    Skymonster
    Participant

    A Ryanair flight that it’s own CEO could not go on…! Now there’s a thought.

    Andy

    in reply to: Another FR charge on the way…! #489810
    Skymonster
    Participant

    And as bus and train operators don’t feed you when the service is delayed or cancelled, don’t put you up in hotels when the vehicle breaks down and in general don’t give a fiddlers naughty for your welfare, then, (oh gawd, this next piece is so difficult for me to type), then why should he!

    Actually the long distance TOCs in the UK will put their customers in a taxi if necessary to get them home if the last train of the day is cancelled – as I can testify to as it has happened to me with East Midlands Trains. One of the biggest gripes I have with S…..g 😉 O’Riley and his airline is that he won’t take responsibility for his passengers when the wheels fall off. If this fee means Ryanair will genuinely take care of their punters when things go wrong (again, somehow I feel they’ll still wriggle all they can to get out of it) then they might even go up in my estimation!

    Andy

    in reply to: Flight path… #490023
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Could be that the aircraft was originally looking to land at Biggin Hill, but then there was a change of plan and they were heading off to some place else instead…that’s the joy and luxury of travelling in a private jet, you can simply do these things!?

    Not that easy… There’s things like flight plans need filing to operate IFR etc. and it’s fairly unlikely London would accept one over the radio especially at busy times. Unlikely it was a divert away from Biggin as the weather was good and I suspect any alternate would not need them to climb to 20000 again.

    More likely i think the a/c had some sort of problem and was diverting to Biggin, and then they got the problem sorted before they landed and they decided tiresome their original plan.

    Andy

    in reply to: Another FR charge on the way…! #490031
    Skymonster
    Participant

    I’m not sure that’s even legal!

    Of course it’s legal. Ryanair’s fares can be anything they like and they are at liberty to make up / break down the fares in any way they wish. They are not calling it a tax – which would by misrepresentation – but instead are calling it a levy. Smart. Their fares will be £1.76 more expensive, just like they added a £0.50 wheelchair levy to all fares a few years ago. As long as they don’t misrepresent it as a tax, and as long as they comply with EU rules on showing the total fare rather than adding all the fees, levies and surcharges later in the booking process, they’re OK to do this.

    Can’t believe I’m defending Ryanair for once… Still hate the airline and all it does and represents (including this new levy), and this new levy merely further confirms my feelings. But in reality all airlines effectively have a component already bult into their fares that covers disruption recovery (because it’s a cost that ultimately has to be funded from revenue), and all Ryanair are doing is stating what that component of their fares is.

    My feeling is that the anti-EU rhetoric from Ryanair on this one might not work – I think many of their pax would pay £1.76 extra if Ryanair genuinely look after them when the wheels fall off the wagon (but will they genuinely do it now they’re openly charging for it, or will they still wriggle as much as they can to get out of paying – I suspect the latter,).

    Andy

    in reply to: Aircraft which you wished you had gone on #491033
    Skymonster
    Participant

    Concorde ( this must be top of everyone’s list!!)

    Nope!

    26.02.1991 G-BOAA Concorde 102 British Airways LHR-JFK

    :p

    Andy

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,877 total)