The IAF originally wanted the Mirage 2000-5 and what growth potential did it have ? The F 16 is comparable to the Mirage 2000 in many respects and will be suitable for the Job.
And Exactly what do you mean by growth potential ? The Rafales growth Potential essentially includes AESA radars, HMS etc, all of which the F 16/18 already has. Typhoon, Rafale and Gripen are all 4th Gen aircraft, so no matter how much they grow they will not have stealth and other fifth gen features.
As for the avionics and equipment, with a large order I am sure the F 16 still has a lot of growth potential. If it indeed wins the MRCA order, chances are that India will have more F 16s than the French have their Rafales.
Gripen not being cut at this stage does not mean that it is going to win the MRCA. 🙂 In fact it probably only has an outside chance.
And in the case of it winning there are going to be plenty of orders to go around for both the MRCA and LCA by 2015-20. 🙂
Link fixed
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=BsHSIxvmXcs&feature=channel_page
Looking good and futuristic 🙂
Gripen supporters can heave a sigh of relief..probably the most trusted among defence correspondents in India, Vishnu Som had this to say on BR forums about the Gripen NG’s removal from the MRCA competition.
So, it turns out Huma Siddique got it wrong..this is getting intriguing !
Did he say who his sources are, its possibly his word against hers now. 😉
If not the NG then which was the fighter that did not make the cut. Typhoon or Mig 35 for me.
No i didn’t mean that we need fighter with operational experience but should try to avoid the platform if enemy has some good experience operating it, provided it not the best or the most capable platform being offered. If we are looking at cost as a priority then Gripen is even cheaper.
Chinese have been operating the Su 27s/30s before we got ours. It did not matter much did it ? 🙂
I’m not so sure, how old are the Tu-142s in Indian service? How are their systems? I wouldn’t be surprised if the P-8 is more capable than the Tu-142 export model. It’s a question of avionics. Anyone have any information?
This is what i got from BR. Too big to post please check the site.
Are the IAF PHALCONs equipped with in-flight refuelling capability?
Yes see the images in the previous pages.
I would have to agree with ante_climax here. The realistic goals for IOC for LCA is most likely to be around 2015.
So by 2015, we should have atleast 25-50 MRCAs, 100 LCA Mk 1s (?), 250 SU30 MKIs, 50 Mig 27s, 50 Jaguars, 40 Mirage 2000s, 50 Mig 29s possibly 50 -75 Mig 21s.
Iam also guessing that this ‘World Economic Meltdown’ would be good for many indigenous projects in India. The best solution for this economic problem would be to inject funds into the economy. Purchasing from abroad seems a bad idea as this lets money ‘out’ of the economy. Indigenous projects like mass production of LCAs, ALH, LCH, missles, new indigenou warships, etc would help the economy to resist the global problem.
LCA MK1 will only be inducted in small numbers like 20-40. The Jaguars and Mig 27s are not going to be retired by 2015 so we can see about 100 of each I suppose. Bisons are going to be gradually phased out as MRCA gets inducted.
I have the opposite view. World Economic Meltdown may mean countries offering ToT and Aircraft at a cheaper price which will affect Indigenous products adversely.
Dionis, You said this
The Tu-142M can carry a larger payload and carry far larger sensors. A Boeing 737 mod just doesn’t cut it.
Then why is India buying P 8As instead of upgrading its fleet of Tu-142Ms :confused:
Political decision ?
its just unfair, i wish F-16 should lose. I always envisaged Eurocanards with AESA+Meteor or SH with its powerful AESA and AIM-120D. I just cannot see IAF, after years delays, forums discussions, speculations, comparisions, ending up with same fighter which our enemy has since 25 years.
lets look at the difference between F-16IN and F-16 Block 50/52 which PAF is gonna get.
1. new engine, 3500 pounds of additional thrust AB
2. APG-80 AESA
3. codeone magazine says F-16IN is also going to have different EW, datalink and HMCS from that of Block 60. Its probably going to have some elements from F-35 Avionics.what else? AMRAAM, Sniper Targeting Pod, CFTs, A2G Munitions- everything is same. Its not just that Indias enemy has same fighter, but also the experience and skill they attained from 25 years. That is the most invaluable thing.
Can better avionics compensate for lack of pilot/airforce experience in operating the fighter?
What experience do the IAF have on operating the Rafale, EF and SH ? So if we go by your estimate Mig 35 is the only viable option.
We can take our F 16s year after year to Red Flag to start with 😀
if Gripen goes out, there is only one single engined fighter, so why the need to have years of evaluation and competition.
To appear as being fair 🙂
Will the Americans allow Israelis to export Phalcon to China ? Not in a legitimate way anyway 😉
what about future of F-16. almost every F-16 user will replace it with F-35 in the next decade, and at the same time we are going to induct new F-16s. if we start inducting them at say 2014, then where will it be during 2040?. we should be looking at a fighter which is going to stay for long time to come. Since we cannot go for F-35, the main competition is mainly between Typhoon/Rafale/SH.
how can it be detterent value against PAF which has operating same fighter for more than 25 years.
The major players in the region are going to operate 4th gen aircraft for the foreseeable future. There is a lot of difference between a brand new F 16 and the ones that are getting replaced at the moment. IAF clearly stated that the MRCA will be operational only till 2040. I would assume that the initial batches would be replaced with F 35s (PAK FA, MCAs) way before that. You also have to remember that the IAF initially wanted Mirage 2000s, which would have similarly been out dated by 2040. The difference between all these fourth gen aircraft are nominal, almost all of them come with reduced frontal stealth and EW suites. So for me it do not make more sense to pay for something like a Rafale, or Typhoon, save the money, buy the F 16 and use the money thus saved for a future fifth gen upgrade.
That is exactly why it would be of good deterrent value. The F 16s are the cream crop of the PAF. Now if we get 126-200 F 16s of a latest block that would really be a big psychological edge. As for the training as I have mentioned before DACT exercises between our Su 30s and F 16s would give vital a2a experience for our pilots against the Chinese Su 30s as well as the Pakistani F 16s.
The Chinese still rely on their Bulk of J7s. Which shows that even if the aircraft design is a bit old, new airframes with latest upgrades produced in large numbers are very capable. 🙂
I like the F-16IN as I think its the most capable vs cost of the American Designs and it could lead to the F-35. Yet, looking at the bigger picture. I still think India should select the Super Hornet. Then cancel the LCA and have a joint MCA Project between Boeing and HAL. Which, would be in the interests of both the United States and India. Just my two cents……..
Super Hornets may not be able to operate from the Kiev class Vikramaditya and the future IAC which is designed by the same company which designed Italy’s Cavour class.
So going with F 16IN, forming good ties with Lockheed and then Purchasing
F 35s for IN is the way to go. As for the MCA project, it will depend a lot on how the PAK FA pans out and the ‘success’ of the LCA. The sad thing is that the government has not authorized anything like that yet. It would make sense to skip the 5th gen altogether and go toward developing UCAVs as far as the HAL is concerned. 🙂
Isn’t the LCA suppose to replace the Mig-21’s. With the MMRCA replacing the Mig-27’s and Jaguars………..If, that is the case seems like the tactical two seat F-16’s maybe a better options. Especially, if the F-16’s are to be equipped with CFT’s……..just thinking outloud?
The realistic goals about the IOC of MK2 LCA should start from 2014-15 at the earliest. And most of the Non Bison Mig 21s are being phased out from this year. The Mig 23s are already retired, one would assume that the Bisons as well as the upgraded Jag and Mig 27 fleet will serve till significant number of the MMRCA as well as LCA are inducted. Hence i believe the initial orders will be more single seaters, and the later ones more double seaters. I personally favour single seaters, get the other guy in another plane so to speak :).
Like I said with the Mk2s and Mig 29s due to retirement after that, there are plenty of orders to go around for the LCA and MRCA.
It would be interesting to see how many PAK FAs will be inducted, whether India will follow the U.S style with the raptor and order only in small numbers compared to the rest of the fleet or will it go for mass induction.