Bangalore: India is scouting for 15-16 sq km of land on the moon. The land should be flat in gradient, have an elevated terrain at one end to catch sunlight and a crater that has ample water. The land should also have enough shadow regions that stay cool in the peak of summer.
Indian scientists are confident they will be the first to identify, and perhaps draw the boundaries of, such a location to set up a lunar base when Chandrayaan-2, the second moon mission of the Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro), takes off in 2013. The point where the mission’s moon impact probe (MIP) hits will probably be named after Mahatma Gandhi.“We are confident we will be able to locate such property that will be necessary to carry out experiments and begin the work of setting up a base station in 2020, when India plans to launch a manned mission to the moon,” a senior scientist associated with the programme said.
Isro has sought to name the point of landing of the MIP on the edge of the Shackleton crater after an “important national leader”, who is not living.
“An ideal location is on the edge of the lunar impact crater Erlanger close to the northern pole and is suited for people to live,” said TK Alex, director of Isro’s satellite centre. “The conditions are ideal there to set up green houses for vegetation.”
The proposed location should also have ample deposits of titanium oxide, a compound which indicates the presence of helium-3, which has an earthly price tag of $125,000 an ounce. Helium-3, rare on earth, is sought for use in nuclear fusion. “On the moon, there are many potential areas of the titanium-based mineral that contains helium-3,” Alex said.
India aims to share the lunar base with the global community through an international collaboration under the aegis of the International Lunar Network (ILN), a partnership of 10 space-faring nations, including India, set up last July.
Nasa has indicated its own resolve to set up a lunar base in 2015. In 2006, it reportedly offered India space at the proposed location.
While the race to the moon is on, no nation can actually own a piece of real estate there. In 1967, at the peak of the space race between the erstwhile Soviet Union and the US, the Outer Space Treaty was signed between the two and eventually ratified by about 100 countries under the aegis of the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (Unoosa), to prevent the colonisation of Earth’s natural satellite.
He called the Super Hornet fifth gen. But the video is Impressive.
US ‘red tape’ dogged India Moon mission
The recent discovery of water on the Moon by India’s inaugural lunar mission almost never happened because of a twin helping of good old-fashioned red tape and lingering Cold War suspicions, reports science writer Pallava Bagla.
Hidden behind the euphoria of the find is a less publicised tale of complex back room dealings between Indian and American space science teams.Back in 2004, scientists from the two countries were eager to collaborate, but the Bureau of Export Control in the US did not share this enthusiasm. In fact it was seen by some on the Indian side as being singularly obstinate.
It is accused of not being willing to clear the paperwork that would allow sophisticated American-made instruments to be airlifted to Bangalore for the mission.
‘Not acceptable’
Late in 2005, just a little before Mr Bush made his historic visit to India, space scientists from the two countries were unquestionably eager to collaborate.
But a spanner was thrown in the works by American conditions in the technology co-operation agreement that were not acceptable to India.
Delhi argued that it seemed as if the US was imposing tough conditions on India while at the same time accepting a free gift from it to fly US payloads to the Moon.
Talking in 2006, Isro chairman Madhavan Nair argued that the US move could “compromise” India’s interests.
Even as President Bush flew to India, officials from both countries were working hard to hammer out acceptable texts for highly complex bilateral umbrella agreements – called the Technology Safeguards Agreement (TSA) and the Technology Assistance Agreement (TAA) for space co-operation.
Experts say that the end product of these talks was the “Chandrayaan-1” agreement, which is how the Bureau of Export Control finally gave Nasa permission to ship the instruments.
It is not much publicised outside Isro, but the fact is that India had to keep the designs of Chandrayaan open for a long time just to accommodate huge delays by American bureaucracy.
The Moon Mineralogy Mapper, or M3, one of the devices behind the water on the Moon findings – was literally the last of the 11 instruments to be accommodated on board the Chandrayaan mission.
‘Hurdles’
This is not the first time that a high-profile Indo-US space dream has nearly died early because of what some in India see as the unbending attitude of US bureaucracy.
In 2006, India’s dreams of launching a Moon mission in conjunction with America’s Boeing Corporation were shattered soon after the deal was announced.
It was aborted not because Isro and Boeing were unwilling to become partners, but because of huge delays in getting export clearance from the US state department.
Indian experts argued that the agreement failed to materialise because of “huge delays and immense hurdles” thrown in their way by American bureaucracy in Washington.
The Americans, it was thought, were fearful that the deal could result in a diversion of dual-use technologies for military purposes.
“The [paperwork] took so long that the whole project itself was over by the time clearances came through,” Dr Nair said.
Boeing and Isro finally called it quits on their tentative joint venture in late 2006.
Even today it still seems that the Americans want to co-operate with India only on certain science-based satellite missions.
They seem to be happy that co-operation takes place in not-for-profit science related projects, but profit-making commercial ventures in the lucrative space market are still a no-no.
Indian experts hope that the recent success of the Moon water mission may alter this approach by Washington and lead to a robust Indo-American planetary exploration partnership that is free from the shackles of ever-suspicious civil servants.
It is also accused of using “all the tricks in it is pockets” to scuttle the operation before then US President George W Bush reportedly intervened to make sure this did not happen.
It is important to remember that the Moon mission was planned and executed well before the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal was finalised in 2008, a historic moment prior to which there was much suspicion between the two countries.
Back in 2005, in initiating its collaboration with the Americans, the Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro) decided to forget the two sides’ rocky past. India had been denied access to technology under US sanctions imposed after nuclear tests in 1974.
Even today, many Indian space laboratories continue to languish on a dreaded US blacklist.
The $100m Chandrayaan project was an Indian mission with international partners. On board India used a guest instrument from Nasa, a mineral mapper.
This is a laser printer-sized, 9kg device that beamed images of the wet lunar landscape. Another Nasa instrument, a small radar called a MiniSAR, was also flown aboard the Indian mission.
Isro decided not to charge its guests for this 400,000km (248,548-mile) journey. The international instruments were all flown free to the Moon.
The only expectation Delhi had in return for this agreement was that the scientific data collected from the guest instruments would be shared with Indian researchers.
It is this visionary arrangement that brought India its water-on-the-Moon moment.
L&T will bid to build navy’s second submarine line
New Delhi: Engineering and construction giant Larsen and Toubro Tuesday said it will bid for the Indian Navy’s second line of conventional submarines.
The company had built India’s largest shipyards, near Chennai and in Gujarat, which had the capacity to build all types of naval construction, including submarines, L&T chairman and managing director A.M. Naik told reporters here.
“We will be bidding for the navy’s second line of conventional submarines,” he said.
He pointed out that L&T, along with the Russians, was vying to build Amur-class vessels but the initiative did not take off due to lack of funds.
“Our shipyards in Hazira and Kattupalli have the capability to take up construction of vessels of about 7,000 to 9,000 tonnage and even warships of the size three or four times these vessels,” Naik said.
India Seeks Strategic Posture for Air Force
NEW DELHI – As the Indian Air Force (IAF) turns 77 this year, it aims to become an emerging strategic force.
Addressing an Oct. 1 news conference here, Air Chief Marshal Pradeep Vasant Naik, the IAF chief, said, “We are acquiring capabilities and modernizing the existing assets to deal [effectively] with any conflict scenario.”
The IAF will never be an adversary force, Naik said, adding that “our priority is to meet the country’s aspirations. India has spheres of influence from the Strait of Malacca to the Strait of Hormuz, and the IAF should have greater reach and air superiority.”
The IAF today is improving its reach, firepower and protection, he said, adding that priorities are to have long-range aircraft, lethal weapons, precision munitions and a robust air defense network.
The IAF this year inducted one AWACS aircraft, and two more will come on line in 2010. In addition, the IAF is acquiring three midair refuelers, six C-130 transport aircraft, 80 medium-lift helicopters, Spyder air defense systems, medium power radars and low-level transportable radar.
India also has entered into an agreement with Russia for the joint development of fifth-generation fighter aircraft and for production of medium transport aircraft.
“We are also building capabilities in satellites, communications, radars and electronic countermeasures,” Naik added.
In addition, IAF will procure 180 basic trainer aircraft through a global bid.
Indian air force unveils upgrade plan
NEW DELHI: India’s air force on Thursday announced plans to buy scores of new trainer jets for a new generation of pilots as the rapidly developing country boosts its military capability.
Air Force chief P.V. Naik said India would buy up to 80 planes from abroad in a deal thought to be worth 5.5 billion dollars, while a similar number would be made by domestic manufacturer Hindustan Aeronautical.
India in 2004 purchased 66 Hawk trainer jets worth 1.45 billion dollars and Naik said negotiations were on with British defence equipment firm BAE Systems for additional purchases.
India’s air force, the fourth largest in the world, has ambitious expansion plans and is currently conducting trials before buying 126 new fighter jets for 12 billion dollars.
‘We are modernising in a very big way,’ Naik told reporters. ‘We are looking for a meaner and leaner air force.’
The United States in March approved the sale to New Delhi of eight Boeing anti-submarine aircraft worth 2.1 billion dollars, the largest ever sale of US arms to India. -AFP
Air force seeks nod to shoot Maoists in self-defence
SUJAN DUTTA
New Delhi, Oct. 1: The Indian Air Force has asked the government for permission to open fire during the offensive against Maoists when its helicopters will transport equipment and troops.
“We have asked permission to open fire in self-defence after one of our air warriors was killed by Maoists who opened fire from the ground,” Air Chief Marshal Pradeep Vasant Naik said here today.
The use of lethal firepower from the air is a sensitive issue. Even in Jammu and Kashmir and in the Northeast, the air force says, it has not done it. But a senior air force headquarters officer said the offensive against the Maoists required separate rules of engagement “that are now being drafted”.
Armoured and armed Mi-17 helicopters of the Indian Air Force will be used extensively during the offensive, as will be pilot-less spy planes, Naik said. He said “we do not want to publicise” the number of Indian Air Force personnel and equipment to be deployed in the anti-Maoist offensive, because “it was up to the ministry of home affairs”.
“We are very, very chary about collateral damage (killing or hurting non-combatants),” the air chief said “but there is definitely a case for greater use of airpower.”
The air force sought permission about 45 days back — in August — when the Union home ministry began calling for inputs from multiple agencies in the security establishment to plan its offensive. Defence minister A.K. Antony, asked about the IAF’s plea, said: “We are yet to take a decision on it. We will take a decision at some point of time. Right now we are providing logistical support.”
The anti-Maoist offensive has begun unfolding in Chhattisgarh but it is likely to be stepped up later this month after the Maharashtra Assembly elections (October 13).
The flight engineer in an IAF helicopter, Sergeant Mustafa Ali, was shot in the head on November 14 last year even as Squadron Leader T.K. Choudhury was desperately piloting the Mi-8 to safety. Suspected Maoists had opened fire with AK-47 rifles damaging the helicopter’s rotor blades, fuselage and engines but it managed to fly from Pidia, about 500km from Raipur in Chhattisgarh, to Jagdalpur, Bastar district. The helicopter was barely 30m above the ground when it was targeted.
Again on April 16 this year, an Mi-17 piloted by Squadron Leader R. Dhobhal and Flying Officer K. Prakash was fired at at Binagonda in Maharashtra’s Gadchiroli district when it was transporting voting machines and polling personnel to Laheri. The helicopter was being loaded when the attackers opened fire.
On the strength of its experience, Naik said, the IAF had made recommendations and sought permission to use the Mi-17 in attack mode if it seemed fit.
“The IAF tries to ensure that there is minimum threat to the air crew in these areas,” the Air Force chief said. “The role of the IAF in internal security is going to increase.… We are already involved in internal security in different areas of the country,” Naik said.
The air force has used its helicopters from as many as 13 airbases largely to transport troops and machinery, in search and rescue operations and as air ambulance. In February 2008, however, it deployed two Chetak (two-seater) helicopters to help ground troops track Maoists who had raided police armouries in Orissa.
Naik said in the offensive against Maoists that was now on the drawing board, unmanned aerial vehicles could be used to guide and direct ground troops. But he said arming the pilot-less planes for firing on the ground was not likely.
He referred to the US’s using Predator drones against suspected Taliban militants and said “remember, none of this is being done in ‘own-territory’”, because the risk of collateral damage runs high. He said he believed the air force’s primary role was in or near the borders but it was inevitable that it would get involved in internal security duties.
“The decision to go on the offensive (from the air against in Maoist zones) is a very tricky issue and must be taken at a very very high level,” the Air Chief said. “It must be based on 120 (sic) per cent intelligence,” he said.
Pending the permission to open fire in self-defence, the air force was using “tactical measures” in the naxal areas, Naik said. “We pay attention to angle of descent, uniform of the crew and such like,” he added. The angle of descent is often a downward spiral because the helicopters do not fly low in these areas. To land, they must descend sharply.
The Air Chief Marshal said the UAVs — Israel-made Searcher II and Heron pilot-less spy planes — could be equipped with sensors to “see through” the foliage even if the “forest cover (in the naxal areas) did pose some problems”.
These aircraft have an endurance of 12 to 16 hours and can be used not only for surveillance but also to guide ground troops. In other words, central police forces in the anti-Maoist offensive will have a kind of close air support.
The air force has also asked for helipads to be sanitised in such a way that they are outside the range of the firearms that the Maoists are armed with. It has said the police should have a cordon at a radius of at least a kilometre around the helipads. All air warriors, involved in the anti-Maoist offensive, have been asked to wear body armour and carry revolvers.
The Mi-17 helicopters that are deployed for the offensive can carry upto 1,500kg of armaments. A senior air force officer said the helicopters will be armed with machine guns but not with rockets.
Though the Mi-17s are used mostly to transport personnel and cargo, they can be configured to attack. In the 1999 Kargil war, the helicopters were used to fire rockets in the heights of Tololing ridge. One Mi-17 of the 152 helicopter squadron with its crew of three was brought down by a shoulder-fired rocket by the intruders.
IAF’s newly-acquired mobile hospital unit to join Cope India
The IAF will field the ‘Rapid Action Mobile Medical Hospital’, its latest induction, during next month’s air exercise with the US Air Force at Agra.
The mobile medical unit, with a 25-bed capacity, would be deployed in disaster management, medical evacuation and combat search and rescue during the ‘Cope India’ exercise, which will be held between October 19 to 24.
“The mobile medical unit will be participating in the Indo-US air exercise, when IAF personnel will demonstrate its use to their US counterparts,” an IAF officer said in New Delhi on Tuesday.
The hospital has a full complement of operation theatre, oxygen generating system, pre- and post-operation care facilities and can be transported to disaster-hit or operational areas by road or air.
“It can be transported quickly to the area of operation in two IL-76 heavy lift transport aircraft,” the officer said.
The Cope India exercise, to be attended by 200 IAF men and 180 USAF personnel, would also involve the aeromedical aspects of high altitude operations.
The USAF would demonstrate to the IAF its expertise in expeditionary medical support system.
While the USAF would bring in a C-17 Globemaster, a C-130J heavy lift transport aircraft (bought by India recently for its special forces operations), and three C-130H transport aircraft, IAF would get an IL-76, four AN-32s and two Mi-17 transport helicopters, apart from Chetaks and Cheetahs.
IAF plans to induct lethal killer drones by 2011
The IAF will induct lethal killer drones within two years, providing itself the capability to hit high value targets such as enemy missile and radar sites, and even terrorist hideouts.
A senior IAF officer said in New Delhi on Wednesday that Israeli-made ‘Harop’ unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV) would join the IAF by 2011 and it will enhance the war-fighting capabilities of the IAF, both conventional and low intensity conflict.
Harop will be IAF’s first unmanned aerial vehicle for offensive strikes, though it already possesses a fleet of ‘Searcher’ and ‘Heron’ UAVs to perform surveillance and reconnaissance roles.
The Harop will provide IAF the capability to take down enemy positions without having to send its manned fighter aircraft to hit ground targets.
Developed by Malat, the UAV division of the Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), the Harop UCAVs were bought by India recently through a reported USD 100 million deal for up to 10 drones.
Harop, which is usually launched from ground- or sea-based canisters, can be adapted for air-launch too. Harop is an upgraded and larger version of the Israeli Harpy UAVs, an anti-radiation seeker designed to loiter, detect and home in on enemy radar positions which India had bought and inducted into its armed forces in the past.
Unlike the fully-autonomous Harpy, the Harop is controlled in flight by a remote operator. Rather than holding a separate high-explosive warhead, the Harop drone itself is the main munition and is designed to loiter the battlefield and attack targets.
The UCAV cannot only hit enemy radars by locking on to their radio emissions, but also has an electro-optical sensor that allows the remote operator to select static or moving targets in a battlefield.
Harop, a 23-kg warhead, is 2.5 metre long with a 3-metre wingspan and has a six-hour endurance.
Moreover, unlike the Predator drones being used by the US against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan that can fire missiles and return after a mission, the Harop is self-destruct, making them a more expensive option.
The IAF officer said while efforts were on to develop indigenous UCAVs, India is “not very close” to have them in its fleet.
“There are plans for UCAVs. But it will take time, as nobody is willing to give us the technology,” he added.
The IAF’s procurement plans for UCAVs actually start in the 12th five-year plan that begins in 2012.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/iaf-plans-to-induct-lethal-killer-drones-by-2011/523326/1
FinMin opposes IAF choice for refuelling aircraft
The Indian Air Force’s plan to acquire six new refuelling aircraft to give its fighters extended reach has hit a roadblock with the Finance Ministry questioning the selection of the European Airbus 330 MRTT aircraft that costs almost twice as much as its Russian built competitor.
While two aircraft—the Airbus 330 MRTT and the Russian IL 78—had taken part in the global tender taken out in 2006 to provide six refuellers, the Air Force had recently selected the European platform after technical trials. This, despite the fact that India already has a fleet of six IL 78 tankers ordered from Uzbekistan in 2002.
However, the Finance Ministry is said to have objected to the selection as the Airbus 330 MRTT deal would cost upwards of Rs 8,000 crore against the estimated budget of Rs 5,000 crore set by the Defence Ministry. On the other hand, the fleet of Russian built IL-78 would cost only Rs 4,800 crore.
The Finance Ministry has pointed out that India already has a fleet of the IL 78 refuellers, making it easier to induct a larger number of the aircraft. Financial advisers have also pointed out that the IL-78 fleet currently in service with the Air Force is relatively new as the last aircraft was inducted as late as 2004. This, analysts say, rules out the argument that a modernised platform is needed by the Air Force.
The Air Force, on the other hand, is fed up of constant delays in spare parts as well as quality issues with Russian built aircraft. The Russian aircraft, officers say, also did not meet all requirements set in the tender. Senior officials have pointed out that not only does the Airbus aircraft have a larger range but also the ability to carry extra fuel along with a passenger or cargo load.
While the IAF is very keen on acquiring refueling aircraft at the earliest given the threat environment and the need to deploy fighters on extended missions, the Finance Ministry’s objection is likely to delay the final signing of the contract.
RIP
The contract is expected to be worth close to $ 2 billion.
The Vikramaditya was expected to cost much as well. It may well be a journo feeding on outdated information.
F/A-18’s can not cope against PLAAF’s fleet of Su-27’s and J-11’s and J-10’s, not to mention the Su-30MKK etc etc…
:)) It can more than cope with anything China has on its inventory.
what about offerings from MBDA?
The MICA is probably inferior to the latest AMRAAMS. The Meteor is delayed till 2015.
Hey, why not take something completely un-related and out of context next time to try and make a point..?
Its better than calling users in these forum muppets, I was only voicing my support to his view.
:rolleyes: The same thing is done in other threads by others.
Well, whatever. As long as I don’t have to listen to Euros whining about the US abandoning them I’m happy. Let you guys deal with your problems yourself. Don’t want to hear anybody whine about any imagined “commitments” to Poland and the Czech Republic either as they left when the missiles and radar got the axe.
Contrary to what many Europeans here say. I have read news-reports where their leaders feel like you say abandoned by the U.S.
See for example the tantrum Mr.Brown of U.K threw when he could not meet Obama.