yeloooo from haldi masala onleee :dev2:

wokay!

What’s haldi masala ?

If you are talking about Indian food, you better talk about South Indian food 🙂 Idli & Sambar may be 🙂

The other F 16 doesn’t have the tint in that picture if you noticed. :rolleyes:

Treated canopy like this one?

Is that not yellow because it got old ? The Iraqi Migs in Serbia has a better tint :diablo:

Take a look at export Vipers, you wont see the special canopy f.e. – there are many other things also which are included – eg RAM over the radar bulkheads which are on the restricted list. The same holds true for India and the F/A-18 E/F whose radar blockers etc are export controlled, so claims of the heavily RCS reduced F/A-18 E/F wont hold true in the MMRCA context. In contrast, the MiG-29 K comes with RCS reduction exported by the Russians (India is anyway a partner for the FGFA as well.

So you are saying the block 60 has a bigger RCS that the C/D in American Service ?
Boeing has talked about the F/A 18 E/Fs low RCS with regards to the MRCA. Yes radar blockers may be removed but I believe the RCS would still be pretty low.

Selling F 22 would be good for Lockheed as well. F 35 has more potential for future sales elsewhere, so its like an assured sales assett for LM.

Maybe. History books are full of repainted stories. I don’t give damn and certainly see nothing about Bush that was great. For me he was, is and will stay a pathetic, illiterate clown. If that is what is considered as great in the US, then I shall add no more comment..

What does it mean “historically Jewish”? That any Jew can just walk in and take whatever property he sees fit because it “belongs to him”?

BTW, what exactly do you mean by the term “Jewish”? A race? How exactly do you want to prove that somebody is or isn’t of Jewish race?

No actually history is more accurate when you view it from a distance. What I mean is that as more time goes by people become neutral with regards to history. Let me give you an example, one of the biggest historical disputes of the 20th century was about the events leading up to the start of the first world war. Early studies on the topic was biased towards one side or the other, but historians have a generally agreed view now. Why ? Because no one really gives a damn about what happened back then and there are no vested interests. With regards to Bush and Obama the current Villian-Hero portrayal will probably be changed if you read history books a few decades from now.

No if you study history you will see that the land of Israel was historically occupied by Jews, and was under the control or Persians, Romans, Muslims, Turks, etc. Actually Israel as a state is so significant in the historical contest, because it is the first fully independent Jewish state after Babylonians sacked ancient Jerusalem thousands of years ago. And if I were a Jew and waited all those thousands of years to have my land back, You can be rest assured I won’t give it up for peace or anything. 😉

I think the future American generations will regard George W. Bush as a great President and that history will not be very kind to Obama. I am sure if he was white he would be criticized a lot more, now if they say anything about Obama the democrats will come up with the race card.

Again, who was running who out of town?

Its historically Jewish land being occupied by other races over the course of centuries. Now its their chance to dictate terms and reclaim their land and they are doing that. Like Mr. Libreman said just learn to live with it, there will not be any permanent peace for the time being. I am very happy Israel has a strong government telling Obama and Co to stick it.

Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize. This move certianly has had an effect on the decision I believe. The Peace loving Europeans are really clever, now the ‘Angel of Peace’ Nobel Laurate Obama will hesitate before sending troops to Afghanistan.