Production of the MiG-23B / BN established in Moscow, the plant “Banner of Labor” (“Знамя Труда”)
thanks
the rest of the numbers in post # 17 look ok to you
The Su-15 was useless against a F-104 in the striker-role at low level and its weaponary did not allow a turning contest higher up. Ask the Italiens about that. High-up and supersonic the wing-load comparison no longer works, when it comes to the lift ratio of the wing design. .
so high wingloading at high altitudes makes you more agile ?
and 1979 on the TM versions were cleared to carry R-60
http://forums.airforce.ru/matchast/4…zdadim-vmeste/
“23-11” – 3
MiG-23S – 59
MiG-23 – 98
MiG-23M – 1353
MiG-23MS – 196 or 179
MiG-23MF – 184 or 278MiG-23M+MiG-23MS+MiG-23MF=1810
MiG-23P – 321
MiG-23ML – 750
MiG-23MLA – 1100
MiG-23MLD – ?Znamya Truda Plant (Moscow) – 4,278 pieces
Plant Irkutsk – 769 pieces
I’m sorry to bother you again but I have having trouble with these figures
lets add them one final time, I have tried to summarize your previous posts
1353 MiG-23M+ 179 MiG-23MS+ 278 MiG-23MF=1810
321 Mig-23P +750 Mig-23ML + 1100 Mig-23MLA
= 3,981 these are all fighter versions from Znamya Truda plant
Production of the MiG-23UB in Irkutsk reached 100 pieces per year. Total released 1008 MiG-23UB
623 MiG-23B/BN ( I’m assuming also at Irkutsk plant?)
So total Mig-23 of all variants ( not including Mig-27 ) was = 5,612 from years 1969-1984
Does this seem correct to you ?
You are right even in the pure interceptor role su15 is likely to encounter especially in the Southern sector F104 or mirage configured for a strike role also personally I think phantom is head and shoulders above the flagon in terms of performance
Agreed but in terms of missile armament, agility , performance isn’t su15 more similar to f104 than f4 ?
F-104 in competition with the MiG-21
F-106 compare with su-9 / su-11
F-101 – Yak-28P and Tu-128
Su-15 it makes sense to compare with the F-4
I Think it would be fair
But even in fighter role su15tm is not even comparable to f-4C/D versions ?
how do you see it?
To stick to the point, both POV fighters were developed in the late 50s to carry two big AAMs against less manouverable bombers/ similar recce-ac or high flyers. .
indeed but a lot of tactical strike planes in the 60s to mid-late 70s were high flyers too esp with non-NATO states on border of USSR , so they can be used again them too in a pinch if needed …fair to say ?
One thousand nine hundred eighty two:
Frontline aviation: 25 Su-25, 400 Su-24, 500 MiG-27, 1200 MiG-23 various modifications, 150 MiG-25, 630 MiG-21, 100 Su-17, 150 Su-7, 190 Yak-28;
Air defense: 100 MiG-31, 250 MiG-25, 800 MiG-23, 900 Su-15, 100 Tu-128, 200 Yak-28, 50 Su-9/-11
The quote you gave is from Flight international 1982 sept , so by late 1982 it was estimated by Flight magazine that 800 mig-23 were with PVO and 1200 various versions of mig-23 with VVS
if we want to get an estimate of fighter version of Mig-23 is it safe to assume that 1300 in total between VVS and PVO of the mig-23s fighter versions in service( by late 1982) were M,MF, ML ,P versions ?
thanks for your patience
Paralay I think we in the west underestimated the threat of mig-23 in the early 80s , it seems like that almost 1800 of just the fighter version of mig-23M/ML/MLA were operational by 1985 ! Is that fair to say ?
The plant “Banner of Labor” in Moscow could produce at least 160 pieces per year
and that is just one plant
and they were produced in the 70s in the Irkutsk plant as well ?
MiG-23M (ed. “23-11M”), produced from 1973 to 1976
According to book Polish authors, was issued 750 MiG-23ML(23-12),of which-third went on exports.In turn,the plant Banner of Labor officially indicates that it produced 1100 aircraft modification MLA(23-12A) in 1977-1983 years, and separates them from ML.
I have heard from 1975-1980 mig-23 was produced at a rate of 400 aircraft per yr is that accurate ?
I have the book ” Military balance of 1980-1981″ which lists as 600 mig-23 with PVO and 1000 mig-23M with VVS , not sure how accurate these numbers are
can you verify this ? thanks again
See where those two PVO fighters were deployed in the 70s and you realize, that non had a chance to come near the western tactical aircraft mentioned. Just kept to bolster numbers.
thanks I understand
But in those regions they were deployed close to Iran Turkey border and both these countries had modern aircraft in service
The heat sig of a f100 or lightning would be a lot more imho
Even running into a striker by luck only. They had no head-on capability nor a weapon to down something close to the lawn.
so in the 80s both of them are completely obsolete but in the 70s they had some relevance as some NATO tactical aircraft did operate in the medium altitude realm
User gave the perfect answer.
which user?
Both were day/night interceptors with AAMs against high flying bombers or similar recce birds. They had no look-down and shoot-down capabilty.
for the most part they were guided by GCI radars
against the contemporary strike aircraft when they are laden with fuel and ordanance (like jaguar, buccanear , f-105, A-7, F-100 )
they would not be able to intercept them at all ?
I was under the impression that yak-28P had decent low level performance