dark light

nastle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 404 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: unit cost of F-16 A/C and Mig-23ML in 1990 #2139862
    nastle
    Participant

    thanks Ozair

    in reply to: unit cost of F-16 A/C and Mig-23ML in 1990 #2139874
    nastle
    Participant

    rough idea ?
    I bet 5-6 mil for mig-23 and 10-15 mil for f-16

    any takers ?

    in reply to: F-15 and AIM-7 question #2139917
    nastle
    Participant

    ^ so even though R-33 is a SARH missile due to foxhounds radar ( basic mig-31 right not mig-31b) it can direct 4 missiles at 4 different targets ?

    in reply to: Shenyang J-8II vs Sukhoi Su-15TM #2140019
    nastle
    Participant

    Flagon can also carry gunpods for short range missions right ?

    in reply to: F-15 and AIM-7 question #2140022
    nastle
    Participant

    Thank you
    Did the Mig-31 and tornado ADV have that ability in the 1980s ? i.e target 4 aircraft at the same time ?

    in reply to: Shenyang J-8II vs Sukhoi Su-15TM #2140450
    nastle
    Participant

    Su-15 can carry 4 x K-8 I thought it carried 2 with 2 x R-60 ?

    Also it seems like a lot of Su-15 regiments later in the cold war were in the far east , were they deployed with an eye towards china as they were qualitatively better than what chinese have to offer and a threat to their strike planes like H-5 and A-5 bombers ?

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #1999662
    nastle
    Participant

    Were the Udaloy I destroyers in the 80s equipped to fire SSN-15 and SSN-16 ASW missiles through their torpedo tubes ?

    in reply to: Japanese airforce capability in the 80s #2142461
    nastle
    Participant

    ^ so they could target ships at night with anti-ship missiles ? but had no other PGM ?

    nastle
    Participant

    BTW, the Kyndas had eight ready missiles and eight reload missiles.

    but I’ve read they could not reload at sea

    Sea Sparrow was really effective against missiles.

    Did you mean NOT very effective

    The early Sea Sparrow with Mk115 director was man steered and not able to shoot down missiles. The more modern Mk91 director may be theoretical able to do it, but I am sure it was not really effective against missiles

    .
    When do you think the more modern Mk91 director was common ? in the late 80s

    The flight path of P-35 was unfavorable for Sea Sparrow and better suited for Terrier and Tartar. The P-35 flew with 1.3 mach, the reaction time was very short for Sea Sparrow. P-35 flew around 100m above sea for the last miles to the ship. It was removed in 2003. There were enough replacements for P-35 around in the Soviet/Russian Navy much earlier and why it was not replaced? It seems it was still effective.

    So sea sparrow was essentially point defence ? could an average 80s DD or FFG with 1 sea sparrow launcher with 2 directors shoot down 6 -8 P-35s ? if not then it seems like each kynda can knock out two DD or FFG !

    BTW thank you so much for answering my questions I really appreciate the valuable info esp about the P-35

    nastle
    Participant

    ^ 250 km striaght meaning w/o OTH guidance ?
    but the flight profile of P-35 was such that it was very easy to intercept for lets says sea sparrow SAM ?

    in reply to: Project 1143 Kiev Class aviation cruisers #2000052
    nastle
    Participant

    ^ Thanks
    there is an impression created by western “experts” that none except for the SAN6 and SAN9 had any realistic chance of intercepting the Harpoon

    in reply to: Project 1143 Kiev Class aviation cruisers #2000059
    nastle
    Participant

    Defensive armament comprises 2 x 2 Storm-M long range SAM launchers,

    Can these missiles have a secondary function as anti-ship missiles ( ASUW) ?

    2 Osa VLS short range SAM launchers,

    can these missiles intercept ASM like Harpoon ?

    Also it seemed like Kiev , Minsk carried 16 x P-500 , NOVOROSSIYK 8 x P-500 and BAKU 12 x P-500 does that seem accurate ?

    in reply to: Mig25PDS as escort fighter #2143473
    nastle
    Participant

    ^ NO f-117 WERE in service of gulf states

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2143479
    nastle
    Participant

    can anyone please post pics of Mirage III and 5 in PAF service from the 70s and 80s ( before the upgrades ) PLEASE and thank you

    in reply to: How good of a fighter was the Mirage F1? #2143481
    nastle
    Participant

    The Mirage F1 was a very good multi-role fighter, a relatively cheap alternative to the late production F-4E, and altogether superior to any comtemporary Soviet fighter before the MiG-29.

    As a multirole aircraft yes definately superior
    but was Mirage F1 fighter versions capable of shooting down
    1-Mig-25
    2-Mig-23ML/P
    any instances of that happening ?

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 404 total)