Doubt it was the first, and certainly wasn’t the last occasion where people died flying during filming.
It cropped up on RAF Commands
Funny, I’ve just finished reading the book. I wonder how the film will compare.
You mean this wording:
“It should be noted that the Ministry of Defence is not prepared to grant, indefinitely, sole rights of recovery to any individual to excavate a particular site, but, other than in exceptional circumstances, only a single licence will be granted to work in a specified area at any one time.”
What are the requirements for inclusion on Runnymede? Is it the same as some other memorials around the world where if CWGC either didn’t have a grave to maintain or the location of one was too difficult then the person was commemorate on the most suitable memorial. I’ve come across this with the likes of the Singapore Memorial including people with known graves but in out of the way bits of SEA which CWGC decided were too far out (mostly Burma).
It was some time in the 70s or early 80s going by what google brings back about those squadron codes. The airfield it is on looks very disused so I’d agree about a forced landing, also the mobile control caravan is an interesting feature, why you’d drag one of those to a disused airfield when a man with a flag would do?
When I first saw the item in the third photo I thought it might have been a cowl flap, but it isn’t, other than that the pieces are small parts which on the face of it could be from any number of aircraft, particularly AM marked items. I think the bottom photo (the one with barely readable numbers) is an insulator from some electrical equipment so again a standard part.
The possibility that I find most likely is that was more than one crash in the area with the 1947(ish) accident being the one which is remembered but the only wreckage remaining at a crash site is from an earlier accident which either isn’t on file or has been records poorly.
Laurence, yes, that’s one of mine.
I’ve conceded defeat, no point in prolonging it, even though the 4 triplanes were to differing designs, so technically different aircraft.
You still have enough guesses, though you might a well have it, i’d picked I.
Which one?
No, not that one.
This one might not be lasting too much longer, Yes and Yes.
Yes
Yes, it is pre-1918.