dark light

Alan Clark

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 741 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Alan Clark
    Participant

    The reason there is no MACR is because the crash occurred in an area where the US authorities had access and the aircraft was not missing, and so there is a Form 14 (Report of Aircraft Accident) for the loss instead, which is listed. The photographs of the crash site are marked as having come from the accident report.

    I have only seen wartime deaths of US service personnel registered before the US entry into the conflict and the Isle of Man. It would appear there was an arrangement made to exempt the US services from having to register deaths in the UK for the duration. Post war, and I am not entirely sure when it occurred, deaths began to be registered in the UK.

    in reply to: Palmgrens Leather Flight Helmet – Any info? #830973
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    A google search suggests that it is not a flying helmet but a Swedish tank crewman’s helmet, of WW2 vintage.

    in reply to: Palmgrens Leather Flight Helmet – Any info? #831252
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    The crowns are a military mark, it’s on a jacket I have, not quite dress uniform, it’s plain green but definitely more ceremonial than a working uniform item.

    Edit: I should have added that it is a Swedish military mark.

    in reply to: Maurice Kirk prangs Cub in African air rally #831491
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    To get things back on topic, I think this is the aircraft he took to Africa, G-KURK (from GINFO) it is on a Permit to Fly.

    I’ve looked at those links, I don’t really want to jump to conclusions but I am thinking full on loony tune who enjoys annoying the authorities (though that can be fun) at the moment.

    in reply to: Maurice Kirk prangs Cub in African air rally #831967
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Did I see a short piece in one of the national papers saying he had been asked to leave the rally while in the Sudan/Ethiopia area after carrying out a forced landing on that sector?

    in reply to: General Discussion #253442
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    The extent to which cargo would be affected while on the bottom would depend upon what it was and how it was being transported. The example of the Mercury being carried in the U-boat which was torpedoed off Norway showed that the Mercury was being carried in sealed steel containers, but exposure to sea water for now over 70 years has lead to the metal virtually disappearing, some were recovered so they could be tested and it was found that the steel was under 1mm thick and was perforating allowing it leak out on to the seabed. Given that the rate of reaction between iron and available oxygen in sea water is in part temperature dependent it would be reasonable to assume that similar containers in the South China Sea would not fair so well being in much warmer water and subject to a higher rate of reaction. As with Mercury the path along which other metals enter the environment would depend on whether or not they were in a bioavailable form (ie can be absorbed into living organisms). A radioactive cargo would not just pose a radio-logical hazard but as many are heavy metals it would present much the same potential dangers as the likes of Mercury and Lead.

    in reply to: General Discussion #253448
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    From my understanding of Mercury, and it isn’t that great (never really studied it during my contaminated land studies), is that elemental Mercury as it would be in the steel containers is not too much of a problem in so far as it is not easily absorbed into the natural environment. It is heavy enough that if a lot were to escape most would settle to low spots but it could be distributed by ocean currents and wave action and become broken up into lots of small beads which gives a greater surface area on which reactions can take place with other elements/compounds in the sea. If it reacts with anything around it to form compounds then it can usually be easily absorbed into living organisms and being a persistent poison does not leave again and then accumulates in larger predators. That is why eating a lot of Tuna can lead to raised levels of heavy metals, especially Mercury, they feed on the fish which feed on the shrimp which feed on the plankton which are the first to absorb Mercury from the sea. You certainly wouldn’t want to touch shellfish from somewhere which was contaminated with Mercury.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264406
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Surveying equipment, see this ebay listing for a ver similar item, http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HILGER-AND-WATTS-TARGET-COLLECTIBLES-SURVEYING-THEODOLITE-LEVEL-/162185482945

    in reply to: General Discussion #271273
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    MBS, do you go out of your way to find the most right wing anti-immigration videos you can on youtube to repost here or is it entirely accidental? Seems like a game to see how far can you push the Mods before getting yourself red carded.

    in reply to: General Discussion #271976
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Looking at that map it’s a wonder there are any cars left in Baghdad. I wonder what a overlay of the various air strikes (1991-?) would look like?

    in reply to: General Discussion #271982
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Clearly you don’t wish to repeat the Office for National Statistics report figures because it will undermine your position John, so I’ll help you hole your own ship. The most recent report is the month of April 2016. The deficit on goods & services in April was £3.3Bn, taken as goods alone the deficit was £10.5Bn, and those are monthly figures. The quarterly figures were moving in our favour with reducing deficits, this may well change but we shall have to await further reports to be sure of that. Figure 1 of the report shows just how volatile the balance of payments can be, it will be very interesting to see what happens next.

    https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts/balanceofpayments/bulletins/uktrade/apr2016

    As an aside, when the next government fails to secure an agreement with the other 27 nations of the EU (if the Brexit camp stick to the ridiculous idea of halting/massively curtailing immigration, see four core principles of the free market) and we lose the passporting of services I could see that balance of payments going well into the negative as it is services which currently keep us at times to within £1Bn of being a net exporter.

    in reply to: General Discussion #272118
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Did someone mention run away?

    in reply to: General Discussion #272188
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Sovereign Parliament and Justice system, good one there considering that Parliament is already sovereign and has the power to repeal any Act that it has passed.

    All EU legislation has to passed into UK law by our Parliament and before it arrives at our shores goes through a scrutiny process which is more rigerous than our own and it is a process we have a veto over anyway so if our politicians really don’t like it then it’s vetoed before it becomes EU law.

    As for the justice system, well when we created the UK Supreme Court in 2009 a court was created to finally replace the House of Lords in the UK justice system, yes there are courts in Europe which affect us (you’re going to bang on about ECHR & ECJ). The Supreme Court & Europe page on the Supreme Court site makes for a slightly interesting (if sleep inducing) read and sets out why while they consider whether legislation is compatible with the ECHR they can where appropriate overrule their decisions and send them back to Europe so they can be ‘reconsidered’, and they have done that.

    Beyond that we have the undemocratic House of Lords full of appointed cronies, hereditaries and men in frocks. I think i’d rather have the extra brake in Brussels & Strasbourg.

    in reply to: General Discussion #272264
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Its stated EU policy that to trade with the EU, as part of the EEA, a country must be a signatory to the Schengen agreement.

    And to go further, the current to do with Switzerland over a legally bind referendum held there shows what stance will be taken with the Little Englanders when it comes to wanting access to the free trade area without any of the responsibilities.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/03/eu-swiss-single-market-access-no-free-movement-citizens

    in reply to: General Discussion #272526
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    I’ve stayed away from this for over a week, good to see it’s still going. John, as one of the 48 I will whinge and carp all I like thank you very much for I am about to dragged to a place I did not and do not want to go to and don’t intend to go quietly.

    The out vote has lit a touch paper beneath British politics which has the main parties tearing themselves apart leaving the country like a headless chicken at a time when we need clarity. I have found that my MP is utterly useless, he’s too busy retweeting that odious Andrea Leadsom’s nonsense to actually answer legitimate concerns of his constituents or say anything about the overt racism which we are hearing more or less daily now in the local area (last week it was hard to go to the shops without hearing somekind of racist remarks being made). It’s a sad day when the least worst option seems to be Mrs May, I am just hoping that the Police find something to fit her up with as they hate her even more than most people.

    The people’s verdict was more or less a draw, with the number of people now coming out regretting having voted leave a re-run tomorrow would almost certainly go the other way. It would only be a true verdict if it was overwhelming, which it wasn’t.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 741 total)