dark light

Alan Clark

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 741 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Halifax Wreckage Stenciling ID #1088122
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    I am not sure if it is only the first line that is relevant to the paint finish, but as it is stenciled in a single block it is likely that the whole text refers to the paint finish.

    in reply to: Halifax Wreckage Stenciling ID #1088186
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    That is refering to the paint.

    DTD 314 and more specificly DTD 314B was “Matt Pigmented Oil Varnishes and Primer”

    in reply to: 34 MU location 1950-1953? #1091079
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    No.34 MU were at Stoke Heath in the early 1950s.

    in reply to: Help needed!!! :) #1101755
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Just to further muddy the waters, the ‘missing’ person could have been recovered later, ie after Missing Research & Enquiry Unit investigations post 1944 and after MI9 questioning of the prisoner once returned post 1945.

    That would raise the possibilty of 5 crew members being buried together and the 6th man buried either elsewhere in France or elsewhere in the same cemetery (if the crew were later taken to one of the larger collection cemeteries).

    in reply to: Dig 1940 #1102426
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Tell her to take anti-depressants first.

    Sorry Hull, I know it isn’t your fault, first the Luftwaffe then the town planners and then the end of fishing & industry, not to mention two Jags.

    Now on to the programme, it was a good mix of early war events. But, and there is always one. What happened to the crew of the He111? I know it is on Simon Parry’s site but it should have been at least mentioned that 3 crew got out and were taken prisoner and 2 were killed. Also it could have been made clear that it wasn’t a 1940 crash (the only real clue being it was shot down by a Beaufighter rather than Defiant or did I miss the date).

    Interesting that more than one tag came out with the Werk Number on it, the other (in the programme) looked like it had more detail than the one on Simon’s site or is just the fact it actually said Heinkel that it was the example.

    How complete was the less bent engine once the mud was cleaned off it? It looks to be in good condition, certainly an excellent display item.

    in reply to: Corgi Short Stirling #1105113
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Is it from China or the former Soviet Union? :diablo:

    in reply to: Dig 1940 #1107537
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Here’s the IPlayer link http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00wxb07/Dig_1940_Battle_of_Britain/

    The second programme was certainly better than the first as it had more of a ‘storyline’ to it but it does still come across as a bit of a cook’s tour of crash sites with an excavator, it doesn’t go into the reason why they are excavated or the hoops that have to be jumped through to get approval and what happens to the material once it has been recovered. The only mention was World Heritage Site status, I guess it is too boring for primetime viewers to inflict the paperwork on them.

    The aircraft behind the Hurricanes looked like a Handley Page Harrow.

    in reply to: The wonderful thing about TIGHAR….. #1112990
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Yes & No. Paragraph 3 from the current Notes for Guidence:

    “Any individual or group wishing to recover the wreckage of a crashed military aircraft must approach the Ministry of Defence to obtain a Licence (see form of application at page 8) to do so. Licences will be granted to a named individual (not to a group of individuals), who may ask other people to assist, but who themselves must be present during the entire excavation. A Licence will be issued for one year only and will authorise activity within a defined area. It should be noted that the Ministry of Defence is not prepared to grant, indefinitely, sole rights of recovery to any individual to excavate a particular site, but, other than in exceptional circumstances, only a single licence will be granted to work in a specified area at any one time. Therefore licence holders will need to apply for a new licence if they wish to continue working on an excavation into a second year and their application will be considered (on its merits) alongside those of any other applicants seeking to work at the site.”

    in reply to: Meteor T7 /Vampire T11 crash RAF Leconfield circa 1956/57. #1122474
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    The only aircraft from that time period where Leconfield is mentioned specifically and there were two crew killed is Meteor T. Mk.7 WL410, 12-4-1957. Dived into the ground during single engine flying.

    Source: Broken Wings, J.J. Halley.

    in reply to: RAF Commands site #1132753
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Still not working for me either. Time now 15:50 GMT 28/11.

    in reply to: RAF Millom Aviation & Military Museum Closure #1141353
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Canberra, whole!

    Are you having a laugh or just unaware of how it was got out of Salmsbury?

    There are bits of it everywhere and the “careful” cuts by the transport contractor have left wide gaps and cuts where there shouldn’t cuts. At best, hack the cockpit off and weigh the rest in.

    in reply to: Mystery bakelite dome #1153021
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Well, I think your first thought is the correct one, the forward part of the D/F Loop fairing. It is the right size and shape.

    From Elliot Smock’s list of prefixes 10B = Radio (Wireless and Radar) Aerial and Mast Equipment and Insulators.

    in reply to: Geoffery Edward Moon Killed 29th July 1940 #1090978
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    Just checked on RAF Commands and he got mentioned in Henk Welting’s post for the 29th July 1940. http://www.rafcommands.com/forum/showthread.php?t=912&highlight=29-7-1940

    Conclusion was he was killed in Tutor K3287.

    in reply to: Geoffery Edward Moon Killed 29th July 1940 #1090982
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    His death was registered in the Mere district of Wiltshire (now covered by bits of Somerset, Wiltshire and Dorset).

    Upavon was in the Devizes district.

    in reply to: Harrier GR3s XV790 and XZ136 02/11/1987 #1109883
    Alan Clark
    Participant

    http://www.airnorth.demon.co.uk/section3zart3.htm has XV790 as AP & XZ136 as O.

    There is a photo of XZ136 on Flickr taken on the 19th October 1987, http://www.flickr.com/photos/gerbenwessels/3761384156/ so I recoken we could safely say it looked exactly the same just before it crashed. You can see the O on the upper part of the tail fin.

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 741 total)