never;) 😉
i love eagle bashing
its taken over twenty years for euro and russians to catch up
😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮
fantastic idea indeed:)
Mirage 4000
F-20
F-16XL
doesnt matter series lost anyway
doesnt matter series lost anyway
Turbojets consist of an air inlet, an air compressor, a combustion chamber, a gas turbine (that drives the air compressor) and a nozzle. The air is compressed into the chamber, heated and expanded by the fuel combustion and then allowed to expand out through the turbine into the nozzle where it is accelerated to high speed to provide propulsion.
Turbojets are quite inefficient (if flown below about Mach 2) and very noisy. Most modern aircraft use turbofans instead for economic reasons.
A turbofan is a type of jet engine, similar to a turbojet. It essentially consists of a ducted fan with a smaller diameter turbojet engine mounted behind it that powers the fan. Part of the airstream from the ducted fan passes through the turbojet where it is burnt to power the fan, but part, usually the majority, of the flow bypasses it, and doing this produces thrust more efficiently.[1]
A few designs work slightly differently and have the fan blades as a radial extension of an aft mounted low pressure turbine unit.
All of the jet-engines used in currently manufactured commercial jet aircraft are turbofans. They are used commercially mainly because they are highly efficient, and relatively quiet in operation. Turbofans are also used in many military jet aircraft.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbofan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbojet
Have a read through these i only copied a small bit.
There are also some pics to help as well:D 😀
i enjoyed that response PhantomII well done:D 😀 😀 😀 😀
hope your school project goes well chuanren.
keep us posted:D


Top pic BAe’s P. 120 shows its EAP
parentage but has a straight lead- ‘
ing edge and simple pitot intakes
FLIGHT International, 25 May 198&
The P.120 is of the same
general configuration as EAP
but with a straight-leadingedge
delta wing vice EAP’s
cranked leading edge. Other
differences are deletion of the
leading-edge root extensions
under the canards, and a
slightly taller, more pointed
fin than that shown on BAe’s
EFA proposals. The main
difference will be in the
engine intakes, which will be
simple half-round pitot style,
rather than the complexgeometry
box-shaped intakes
of EAP and EFA. EFA’s
complex intakes are to meet
the five nations’ slightly
different requirements, whereas
P.120’s can be simpler to
meet the RAF’s more modest
Mach-number requirements.
The P.120 would be powered
by two “extremely developed”
RB.199s, producing 21,0001b
thrust. The aircraft derives a
lot from EAP structure and
technology and would benefit
from the money already spent
on R&D for EAP and thus
be a logical fallback position
should EFA fail.
Thankyou Thunderbird167 for your exact guidance.:) 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂
I downloaded the pdf and found it on a previous page.
Odd how not one single source on the internet that purports to show the history of the Typhoon ever even mentions the P.120, while the wing and intqake design are clearly closer to the P.120 than the EFA design.
Thanks to all who took the time to read post and to look/research.:D 😀 😀 😀
Fighter Aircraft Generations: A Reference…
When referring to modern fighter aircraft the term “5th Generation” seems to be carelessly thrown about here in discussion forums and other military aviation websites.
So what constitutes a 5th Generation fighter? To answer this question I checked sources such as the Rand Corporation, our good and knowledgeable friends at Aerospaceweb.Org as well as various political and industry publications. It is from these sources that I have compiled a generational listing of fighters and the attributes that categorize them.
1st GENERATION: 1945-1955
The generational system for figher aircraft seems to start with post-WWII fighters.
These are typically subsonic jet aircraft with similar abilities to their piston engined counterparts, they also had similar limitations, such as a lack of radar, and WWII vintage weaponry such as dumb bombs and belt-fed machine guns.
Aircraft seen in dogfights over the skies of the Korean War typify this generation. Aircraft such as the MiG-15, MiG-17, F-86 Sabre, as well as the de Havilland Vampire, Supermarine Attacker, Saab Lansen and Dasault Ouragan.
2nd GENERATION: 1955-1960
According to the Rand Corporation the 2nd generation of fighter aircraft had performance goals in such categories as supersonic speed, ceiling and rate of climb. In addition the technology driving the second generation centered around aerodynamics, propulsion and building materials. New technology advances also enabled this generation to incorporate radar and missiles into their list of assets.
Aircraft typical of this generation are the F-104 Starfighter, F-105 Thunderchief, F-106 Delta Dart, Dassault Mirage III, Saab Draken, MiG-19 & the MiG-21.
3rd GENERATION: 1960-1970
The 3rd generation is marked by technological refinements with a push toward improved maneuverability, multi-role capabilities (carrying out both air to air and ground attack).
Continued improvements in propulsion such as more reliable jet engines with increased thrust and the beginnings of large advances in avionics and weapons systems.
Fighter aircraft that flew in the Vietnam War are included in this group – the 3rd generation includes the F-4 Phantom, Northrop F-5, MiG-23, MiG-25, Sukhoi Su-15, Dassault Mirage F1 and the Dassault Super Etendard.
4th GENERATION: 1970-1990
The 4th generation includes notably more sophisticated avionics and weaponry brought on by advances in computers and system integration. Increased agility and flexibility in mission roles is also a typical attribute of the 4th gen. Examples of the 4th generation are the F-14, F-15, F-16, F-18, AV8 Harrier, MiG-29, MiG-31, Sukhoi Su-27, Panavia Tornado, Dassault Mirage 2000 and the Saab Viggen.
4.5 GENERATION: 1990-2000
The 4.5 generation is typified by many of the same attributes as the 4th generation aircraft except that they incorporate advanced technology that could be interpreted as that for the 5th generation. Dominant performance and technology goals for 4.5 is reduced radar cross section through advanced airframe shaping and radar absorbant materials being used in the construction. Highly advanced avionics are also a prerequisite for this category. The 4.5 generation includes F-18 Super Hornet, Sukhoi Su-33, Sukhoi Su-35, Eurofighter Typhoon, Saab Grippen and the Dassault Raphale. (it bears acknowledgement that Aerospaceweb says that the Typhoon and the Raphale are arguably somewhere between 4.5 and 5th generation.)
5th GENERATION: 2000-
The attributes that characterize the 5th generation of fighter aircraft include highly advanced avionics and stealthy sensory suites giving the pilot a comprehensive view of the entire battlespace. Also characterizing 5th gen is a combination of stealthy design and efficient supersonic speeds.
Aircraft that stand as examples of 5th generation fighters are the F-22 Raptor, the not yet operational F-35, and possibly the MiG MFI and Sukhoi Su-47, should either of them ever see production.
Sources:
Aerospaceweb.Org
Rand Corporation
“Jet Fighter Development”, Hallion (1990)
😀 😀
The AW139 (formerly known as the AB139) is a medium twin-turbine helicopter, which was developed by Bell Agusta Aerospace, a joint venture of Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. of the USA and AgustaWestland.
Perth Western Australia:) 🙂 🙂
im glad you liked perth.
theres some talk of perth may lose redbull soon
i hope not
ausairpower is a think tank or some say fink tank by a group
of so called experts.
there are two groups concerned with F-35 and F-22 in discussions.
one group wants F-22s and the other wants F-35s
and yes i know aus not getting F-22s
It was a great video though pity it wasnt under its own steam.
But it STILL WOULD OF BEEN DESTROYED.:dev2:
Should let the pigs loose in IRAG in its twilight years.:D