dark light

Jezza

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 208 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: KC-45: Lockheed, are you listening? #2483606
    Jezza
    Participant

    your right sferrin

    the USA needs basic ass and trash haulers.
    but want planes out of science fiction or halo troop ships
    too much xbox and playstation 3 and too much money to waste.

    ukraine an 70 is one option

    Ukraine’s NATO bid to be discussed during Bush’s visit

    KIEV, March 13 (RIA Novosti) – Ukraine’s president said on Thursday that his country’s moves toward membership of NATO would be discussed during U.S. President George W. Bush’s visit in late March.

    Viktor Yushchenko was quoted by his press office as saying after talks with European Union leaders in Brussels that the Membership Action Plan that paves the way for membership in the military bloc would be discussed with Bush in Kiev.

    The visit by the U.S. president will take place on March 31-April 1, ahead of a NATO summit in Romania in April.

    Yushchenko said he was positive the NATO summit would back the Ukrainian leaders’ request to allow the ex-Soviet state to join the action plan.

    “I am positive we will realize our desire to join the Membership Action Plan,” he said.

    In January, Ukraine’s pro-Western president, prime minister and parliamentary speaker sent a letter to the alliance’s Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer saying they hoped that the country could join the plan.

    http://en.rian.ru/world/20080313/101274758.html

    in reply to: KC-45: Lockheed, are you listening? #2483755
    Jezza
    Participant

    Northrop takes tailless approach to future airlifter

    Northrop takes tailless approach to future airlifter

    Northrop is proposing a tailless flying wing with powered-lift system for AFRL’s Speed Agile technology demonstration to refine the concept of a STOL transport to replace the C-130 towards the end of next decade. AFRL is looking for a design able to combine a take-off distance under 2,000ft with a cruise speed over Mach 0.8 – while carrying a 30t payload.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/graham-warwick/2007/12/northrop-takes-tailless-approa.html

    in reply to: Super Hornet on verge of becoming export success? #2483759
    Jezza
    Participant

    was there any options on the order of super hornets??????
    it might be a good thing to order a heap of single seaters
    instead of center rebarrelling the legacy hornets.
    and to head off delays in the F-35

    in reply to: KC-45: Lockheed, are you listening? #2483788
    Jezza
    Participant

    the problem with the herc is its weights it can
    carry and the size of the fuselage.
    the a-400m will come along a scope up orders
    with its heavier loads and bigger fuselage.

    the US needs a larger aircraft between herc and C-17.

    maybe
    The An70 is a powerful prop-driven aircraft. While the C-130 can haul 20 tons, and the A400M 37 tons, the AN-70 can carry 47 tons (for up to 1,350 kilometers.) Carrying 20 tons, the An70 can travel 7,400 kilometers. The aircraft also excels in one area the Russians were always good at; the ability to operate from unpaved, and short, runways. The Russian-Ukrainian company developing the AN-70 expected to sell lots of them to countries like India and China, and others that want the most for their money in a rugged military transport.

    in reply to: DD(X) v F100 #2085225
    Jezza
    Participant

    true

    just seems the f-100s are a little small thats all

    in reply to: Mexican General Mexico needs F-16s and F-18s by 2012 #2486521
    Jezza
    Participant

    t-50 or a-50 great choice

    amx needed more powerful motor

    but both would be great

    in reply to: DD(X) v F100 #2085912
    Jezza
    Participant

    Comparison of the DDG-51 and DD(X) Destroyers

    Procurement Cost for the Lead Ship of the Class
    (Billions of 2007 dollars)
    Navy’s estimate 2.6————–3.3
    CBO’s estimate 2.6—————4.7
    Displacement (Thousands of long tons)
    Light load 6.6——————-12.1
    Full load 8.3———————14.3
    Procurement Cost per Thousand Long Tons for the
    Lead Ship of the Class (Millions of 2007 dollars)
    Navy’s estimate 385————–275
    CBO’s estimate 385————–385
    a
    Annual Operating Costs per Ship (Millions of 2007 dollars) 34 22 to 32
    Life-Cycle Costs per Ship (Billions of 2007 dollars)b
    Using the Navy’s estimate for DD(X) procurement 2.1 2.7 to 2.9
    Using CBO’s estimate for DD(X) procurement 2.1 3.8 to 4.0
    Source: Congressional Budget Office.
    a. This number is the same as CBO’s estimate for the DDG-51 because it is based on a direct analogy to
    that ship.
    b. Life-cycle costs are shown on a discounted (net-present-value) basis.
    that envisioned a fleet of 260 to 325 ships, including eight to 12 DD(X)s. The
    program of record submitted with the President’s 2006 budget included 10
    DD(X)s, pending the Navy’s determination of the composition of its future fleet.
    According to that program, the lead ship of the DD(X) class would be procured in
    2007.
    Comparing Construction Costs
    for the DDG-51 and DD(X)
    Comparing the cost of the lead ship of the DDG-51 Arleigh Burke class with the
    cost of the lead DD(X) depends critically on the inflator used to convert 1985 dollars
    to 2007 dollars. According to information in Department of Defense (DoD)
    cost reports, the lead ship of the DDG-51 class, begun in 1985, cost approximately
    $1.2 billion to build. Using DoD’s inflator for overall military procurement
    to convert that amount to 2007 dollars results in a cost of $2.0 billion to
    construct the first DDG-51. However, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for
    Research, Development, and Acquisition, John Young, has stated that if the first
    DDG-51 were bought now, it would cost $2.4 billion (20 percent more than
    DoD’s overall procurement inflator would indicate).2
    According to analysis of the inflationary component of past cost increases in
    shipbuilding programs that was conducted by the Navy and shared with CBO,
    DoD’s overall procurement inflator underestimates the inflation that has actually
    occurred in the naval shipbuilding industry. On the basis of that analysis, the
    Navy provided CBO with a composite inflator that reflects the growth in labor
    and material costs that the naval shipbuilding industry has experienced in the past
    and expects to experience through 2011. Using that inflator, CBO calculates that
    the lead DDG-51 cost almost $2.6 billion in 2007 dollars (see Table 1).
    According to the latest information available to CBO, the Navy estimates that the
    lead ship of the DD(X) program would cost $3.3 billion. (Information provided
    by the Navy suggests that the service’s estimate of that cost grew by about 25 percent
    between the President’s 2004 and 2006 budgets.) Using the Navy’s current
    estimate for the lead ship and historical relationships about how the cost per ship
    declines as more are built, CBO estimates that the DD(X) would cost an average
    of $2.4 billion apiece for a 10-ship program.
    However, recent press reports indicate that the Cost Analysis Improvement Group
    (CAIG) in the Office of the Secretary of Defense believes that procurement costs
    for the DD(X) program may be 33 percent higher than the Navy estimates.3 If
    those reports are accurate, the first DD(X) could cost a total of $4.4 billion,
    implying an average cost of $3.2 billion for a 10-ship program. (As shown in
    Table 2, the Navy’s cost goals and estimates for the DD(X) program and its predecessor,
    the DD-21, have increased several times since 1996.)
    CBO employed a top-level approach to bound the potential cost of the lead
    DD(X). (Our experience indicates that such an approach can provide a good
    indication of a program’s possible costs.) CBO calculated a metric of cost per
    long tons, measured in terms of a ship’s light-load displacement (when carrying
    no fuel, crew, cargo, or water), based on the lead DDG-51. That first DDG-51
    weighed 6,624 long tons and cost a total of $2.6 billion in 2007 dollars, or $385
    million per thousand tons. The Navy now expects the DD(X) to have a light-load

    the rest is here to read
    http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/65xx/doc6561/07-19-NavyDDX.pdf

    in reply to: RAF uniform ban!! #2487133
    Jezza
    Participant

    small minority
    wouldnt be people from other countries would it???????????

    Every nation in the world has some sort of defence force

    Why attack the service people they should change politics
    and politicians.
    Service men and women are just doing their job

    in reply to: DD(X) v F100 #2085999
    Jezza
    Participant

    i would like to see the final prtoduct or australianized F-100
    it supposed to be inline with series II type which is suppose
    to be different to the F-100.
    also heard F-105 should be very similar in outlay.

    in reply to: Ok who's bored? #2087607
    Jezza
    Participant

    Tiddles and Jezza, thanks for your replys. They must have cut me out somehow. Never mind. I wonder who they are insulting now! Are there any other Aussie Defence Forums around?

    carlo kopp is copping a floggin

    in reply to: Seasprites Cancelled #2087611
    Jezza
    Participant

    About time…………….Yet, I don’t see the Super Hornet contract being cancelled!:rolleyes:

    that desicion will be in may
    either way wait and see

    in reply to: Australian Governmant finally axes the Seasprite #2490462
    Jezza
    Participant

    stupid choice in first place

    in reply to: Ok who's bored? #2088323
    Jezza
    Participant

    This is mainly addressed to any Aussies on this board. What happened to The Fifth Column? Has it died?

    yeah still going

    in reply to: Low-Level – Wales – 27th, 28th & 29th Feb 08 #516774
    Jezza
    Participant

    i think its great they are waving to you
    sweet shots

    in reply to: Why twin-seat version? #2501691
    Jezza
    Participant

    2 seat so they can take up people for JOY flights:D 😀 😀

    i think most super hornets are 2 seaters any way
    but its pr for VIPs and others to try it out

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 208 total)