dark light

RobAnt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,792 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: More cloudy day issues #452942
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Or is it an unfortunate by-product of the resizing procedure?

    That would be my experience. I usually make a couple of different sizes for use on my website (744×446) and my monitor (1280×768) and the monitor copy always need to be sharpened when brought down from the original dimensions, and then again when brought down to 744..

    I usually add some sharpening on the picture as a whole, just to counteract that effect. Be careful though, if you go overboard using the “unsharp mask” tool you will also change the contrast levels.

    You can always play around with a second copy of the original, simply use the copy tool in XP (or whatever OS you use) and paste it into another directory to avoid accidentally deleting or modifying the original. Sorry if that sounds like teaching you to suck eggs, but you’d be surprised how many people learn to improve their skills, but then can’t do anything about older images, because they’ve been changed.

    CS2 is a version of Adobe Photoshop. it is now available as CS3. There are loads of reviews, simply do a search using Google or something.

    in reply to: An Article Suggestion for "Flypast" #1281356
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Has it occurred to anyone that not much is known about Mr. Fry’s private life for the simple reason that he likes to keep his private life exactly that?

    Regards,

    kev35

    He’s not that secretive Kev, he participated in the “Who Do You Think You Are – Stephen Fry” geneology programme. Most people know by now that he suffers from bi-polar, and he’s a – what should we say these days? – Confirmed batchelor?

    He also has a “facebook” account. In fact, I think it would be fair to say that Stephen is very open about his private life, which is unusual these days. Much more than many of us, anyway.

    Oh, and he drives a black London Taxi Cab.

    in reply to: An Article Suggestion for "Flypast" #1281645
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Why not have a go at writing it yourself? Try and contact mr Fry, start talking, take a few pics, and start writing. It’s not that difficult, and if Flypast won’t be interested, i’m sure some other mags will.

    So, if I was to do this, what would you, or anyone else who cares to chip in, want to know?

    I doubt I’d be able to travel, and I don’t know how I’d be able to contact him. But I could put out some feelers, I suppose.

    in reply to: Canon EOS400D advice and opinion #452957
    RobAnt
    Participant

    George, it is obviously true that the lens you advocate is a very good one.

    However, most of us who post on this forum are interested in ground to air (or even air to air) photograph of relatively small aircraft (as compared with an airliner) in flight. For that, a much greater zoom is required, if the aircraft isn’t going to look like a spec in the distance.

    Of course advice on general photography is always welcome, and a kit lens is obviously going to be great for everyday, landscape or macro use.

    in reply to: NEW Bomber Command film – Target For Tonight #1283563
    RobAnt
    Participant

    I think they’re very efficient these days, film makers.

    Christian Slater’s movie Churchill, The Hollywood Years, was filmed at my then next door neighbours – Plymouth’s Royal William Yard.

    The site was seen extensively throughout the movie, and they were only there for 2 days.

    in reply to: Canon EOS400D advice and opinion #453029
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Nikon do not offer in-body image stabilisation on any current DSLR model.

    Perhaps RobAnt is thinking of the Pentax K10D and K100D? These DSLRs do feature in-body image stabilisation.

    It’s possible, I might go and get a written quote – just in case. 🙂

    in reply to: An Article Suggestion for "Flypast" #1283583
    RobAnt
    Participant

    I have discovered that Stephen Fry has been associated with G-BEWN, a De Havilland DH 82a Tiger Moth.

    It is a bit intangible though, he simply appears with it in a Best of Fry & Laurie episode, and it could easily have been hired by the production company.

    I haven’t seen the clip, and it is a bit presumptious to assume he owns it without hearing what he has to say.

    [During a discussion on the future of Aviation, Stephen remarks that the flight crew of the future will consist of one pilot and a dog]
    Stephen Fry: The job of the pilot will be to feed the dog. The job of the dog is to bite the pilot if he tries to touch anything.

    in reply to: Canon EOS400D advice and opinion #453048
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Despite your edit none of the specs I’ve seen mention in-body IS on the D40x.

    The Olympus E-510 and Sony Alpha 100 both have in-camera IS.

    Maybe I got it wrong, and it was another model and I got confused. Anyway! I MIGHT get a tax credit payment unexpectedly. For now, I’m sticking with my S6500fd.

    I do like the look of the Sony Alpha, though. It is just whether or not I can get one, and a suitable lens. within a £650 budget. Someone posted their Sony results on here a while ago, and I was very impressed with the pictures.

    I am just looking at the moment, I was in town looking for a barber & dishwasher, actually. (No, I wasn’t thinking of sticking my head in a dishwasher in the hope it would cut my hair! Even though, I’m sure you’d consider it an improvement, Robbo.)

    in reply to: Canon EOS400D advice and opinion #453055
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Really? Which Nikon models are you talking about?

    I was wondering if a Nikon D40x dSLR

    Per chance I was in the London Camera Exchange, Plymouth branch today, and that is roughly what the salesperson said to me. Like I said, I could be wrong.

    I appreciate you may not have seen my edit before taking your quote though.

    Completely agree with everything you say.

    in reply to: Canon EOS400D advice and opinion #453060
    RobAnt
    Participant

    I was wondering if a Nikon D40x dSLR might not be better value, because image stabilisation is built into Nikon bodies and therefore you can use simple, and therefore cheaper lenses. Is it correct to say that with Canons if IS is important to you, then you have to pay more for the more complicated IS equipped lenses?

    I don’t know for sure though, and I’m sure the more experienced dSLR users will have their views on this matter. But I am sure that there are other differences that might swing a decision, even if it is just the way they feel in the hand.

    in reply to: XH558 What next ? #1288230
    RobAnt
    Participant

    It would probably be better to consider modern built and designed replicas of some of these aircraft. But the investment required probably wouldn’t give a high enough return.

    However, I do wonder if someone like Martin Baker or Inflight Refueling might consider taking on Jaguars to try and preserve what remains of their current fleets.

    What would it take to convert a Jaguar into an ejection seat tester?

    in reply to: Saudi Tonkas Arrive At Lossie #526299
    RobAnt
    Participant

    They’re all so clean 😮

    Nice set.

    in reply to: Phantom Experimental Bombing Techniques #1292591
    RobAnt
    Participant

    “sprung vertically upwards whilst the jet was inverted”

    Maybe I have a differant image in mind to the one your describing but as the weapon falls away from the pylon as gravity takes effect would that not be impossible to do? :confused:

    I guess that would depend upon how high above the jet the bomb went upwards, before falling to earth – I can see that it woud need some sort of propellant, or FB spring to throw them high enough – the plane continues forward all this time, and the bombs would need to have sufficient drag to allow the jet to get clear.

    The point being that the weapon isn’t simply left to fall away from the pylon it is pushed upwards. Absolute disaster if the plane is flying low level / not inverted (verted?).

    They were flying at about 100-150 feet (or so it seemed to me).

    in reply to: Phantom Experimental Bombing Techniques #1292607
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Toss bombing involves a climb away from the target, with release in some part of the climb, resulting in the bomb following a curved flight path to the target.

    These aircraft did not climb away, but flew directly over the target, and, I am sure, the bombs sprung vertically upwards whilst the jet was inverted. It would be quite hard to associate this with toss bombing.

    This is why I am suggesting that it might have been an experimental technique.

    I have read that in Vietnam, pilots used to invert their planes to sight the target, then roll back and release their bombs.

    Maybe they were trying to find a way to make this technique even more accurate, by keeping the target in sight longer.

    in reply to: XH558 First Flight #1292793
    RobAnt
    Participant

    There is the potential, next year, that we could be seeing a complete V force in the same part of the sky: –

    Vulcan
    Vampire
    Venom
    &, with luck, Vixen

    (Plus any other “V”s that I might be missing.)

    All right, so it’s not the original “V” bomber force, but still one that excites me. I’m just praying it can all be pulled together by some enterprising airshow team(s).

    Now add a “Virgin” to that, and what a fabulous promotion team would that be! Red Bull would have some serious wings, too. And how about the Brietling V Force!

    A dream cannot be achieved, unless it is dreamt.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,792 total)