Marmite – Love it – hate Guinness – fond of Branston Pickle though
Personally, I think the Bucc is as pretty as a Gannet (that is not at all) – but I have to concede it’s a great photo. More please.
if anyone is interested to see them….
Bit of a silly comment really – of course we want more – and more = and more – we’re quite greedy, you see. You’ll never be able to relieve my hunger for pics like this.
I used This Tutorial – Click Here to teach me how to do the same thing in Paint Shop Pro.
Although it is for PSP5, it works perfectly in PSP7.4
I have made one modification though : –
I keep my watermark as a completely separate image, at the grey stage.
Then with both images open in PSP I copy the entire watermark into memory, switch focus to the picture and paste it as a new layer.
Then it is simply a matter of continuing with the tutorial.
I used my friend’s Fuji S5500 at the weekend, it was very good, but I did find that the shutter lag was worse than my Casio, and that the Viewfinder was not particularly high resolution.
In contrast I showed my friend my EOS300, and like you say Gary, it is in a different league of seeing what you’re shooting.My choice of Prosumer has now come down to:
Canon S2, S3 or Pro 1
Nikon 8700
Fuji S7000 or S9000
Olympus SP500
Forget those two Fuji’s – old technology, relatively slow by today’s standards, and aren’t as well suited to photographing aircraft in flight.
Look at, instead, the S5600Zoom, S6500fd, S9600Zoom and if you want a dSLR, the Fuji S3 Pro.
Edit:— Ooops the S3 Pro has just been supersceded with the S5 Pro!
Amazingly, improvements will include: –
1) LAN Adapter to enable sending of image data at high speed over wireless LAN or Ethernet.
the Viewfinder was not particularly high resolution.
I have to agree with this – the LCD viewfinder can only be described as adequate – but I wonder if any other prosumer has a higher resolution viewfinder? It is, after all, what defines a prosumer from an dSLR. A much higher resolution would be worth paying more for.
How many were at Finningley in, say, 1973/4? I was there, in Engineering, but only ever saw one in very deep servicing during my whole time there.
Affectionately entitled “The Flying Pig”.
Bloody fantastic, I see it’s not a real radar, but even so I wouldn’t have thought it within the price range of your fairly average joe to be able to afford a radar like toy like this, that actually works.
Eyes opened!
I’ll take a look at the manufacturers website, but could I take this with my laptop to an airshow? Or use it on Plymouth Hoe during a display?
How about slaving it to, say, a satellite dish / telescope moving mount thingie and a camera – are those transmissions continuous and accurate enough to guide a camera mounted in such a way?
Scouse – the modern Fujis are much better than than that these days – the S7000 is of an older basic design than the S5600/S5200 and the S9500 – which have a much improved shutter lag performance – it’s practically instantaneous now.
eBay selling is, imho, for mugs!
And yes, I have been described as a large coffee cup occasionally!
Wessex Boy – if you’re taking photos of aircraft in flight – whatever you finally choose make sure it has a 10x zoom at least (note that 10x means slightly different things to different manufacturers, but not enough as makes a real difference).
You can pick up a decent Prosumer for about £200. The minimum you’ll pick up an equivalent performing DSLR for is going to be £600+, by the time you’ve got a lens good enough and big enough to cope.
However, I don’t deny that you MIGHT want to go onto DSLRs later.
Taken with a FinePix S5000 Prosumer:
the old girls
!!!!!
and fill in
oooo, your living dangerously Blue!
Second in my list of nice looking jets, would be the Cessna Dragonfly, and thirdly the Martin B57/EE Canberra – I have a preference for the in-line seating arrangement from an aesthetic point of view, though.
I knew there was something else – but that’s not to say you can’t get accessories – like, as I say, wide angle and teleconverters. These will continue to make it useful long after you’ve emptied the bank on a super-duper multi-billion dollar dSLR.
To be fair, conversion can be done properly and sensitively sometimes.
Royal William Yard, a Naval vitalling yard in Plymouth, (seen here during the filming of “Churchill – The Holywood Years”) has been very nicely converted into apartments and shops.
I used to live right next door when the movie was being filmed.