haha – how about radar controlled panning 😀
Would it work with a stealthy aircraft though? 🙁
They could do it with guns and lights during WWII, so the technology should be cheap enough now.
😮 😮 😮
Some photos you have seen here are taken at 1/60. The spit is lens shake this crop clearly shows it. There is two of everything.
SLR’s can go out to an f-stop of 32 with the correct lens, unlike point and shoots which are often restricted to an f-stop of 8.
As for dust, the spit shot is covered in it.
It’s 1/160th, I would describe it as camera shake – but lens shake is as adequate a description as any. Either way, a faster setting, say 1/250th or even 1/320 or something would help reduce it, at the expense of movement within the propeller arc.
Yep, I agree about the dust, but it’s not present on the Gripen shot, at least not at a normal viewing, so I assume it’s all on the lens, rather than the sensor – but he may have cleaned it.
Yes, it’s also in the exif data of the pictures.
Tv is shutter priority AE (Auto Exposure), explained on page 82 of the manual (you do have a manual, I hope! I downloaded mine from the Canon web site, as the version I got was in German!)
Tv is one of the settings on the round dial on top of the camera, along with A-DEP, M, Av and P.
You have to go into the menu to set the servo auto-focusing, after pressing the AF part of the 4-way (arrow) button, the one with SET in the centre. This is on page 71 of the manual.
So far I have read the manual about 5 times from cover to cover, but then I am a technical author and write that kind of book!
I must say however that compared to my “old” Minolta Dimage A1 the controls on the Canon are far easier to find and use!
Haha 😀 – a manual? Me? For a Canon? No.
I don’t have a Canon, I have a Fuji Finepix S5600.
But rest assured, should I ever get a Canon, I’ll certainly invest in five minutes to download it. 😉
What is the “TV” setting? My camera doesn’t have such a setting to the best of my knowledge.
That tail rotor is going round so fast it is completely invisible. I’m assuming that the bars I can see in the photo are part of the construction, not the rotor.
Try reducing the image size, not the file size to something you can see on the screen – 800x or 1024x width – set up correctly, your image processing software will automatically determine the length – but I crop 800’s to 480, as I have a widescreen monitor. Otherwise I use 1280×768.
Anyway.
Once you’ve done that, try using the sharpening tool – the unsharp mask. This will have the effect of tightening up the images.
Judging by the amount of really great propeller movement you got into the Spitfire picture, you may be using shutter priority set just a little too slowly – use a slightly higher setting until you get better at panning.
Ahh I see that you still have the exif data attached – the shutter is really slow – 1/160 sec – raise it to 1/250th until you get more accomplished, or a longer/better lens.
If your pictures are over exposed, I don’t know how the Canon does it, but at 160th it might not have had the ability to give a high enough F number. On my camera, if it can’t get it high enough, the F number stays red, which means it’s asking me to use a faster shutter speed.
You Gripen photo was much better, and I managed to sharpen it quite nicely:
I don’t see any reason to clean your camera, but there is a smudge on the lens, I think.
Thanks for the link. 🙂
The BBC had a short video of the incident.
If that’s the skill of a “rookie” pilot, it was extremely impressive. The guy has certainly learned his lessons well, and should be well rewarded for his skill in executing the landing.
Wasn’t at RIAT – unless they flew from Brisbane – my post contained link to news item…….
Yep, our posts crossed, as did your post above, and my correction.
:p 😉 😀
Yes you did, you just need to sharpen some of them, that’s all.
If these are pretty much straight of the camera, they’re fine.
Nice photos Gary. Here’s another view of the slightly “scary” Corsair pilot. 😎
Phil
Wasn’t he on Doctor Who?
I’m a stud, very available, and pure as the driven snow.
Do I qualify?
(I’m I terrible liar though 🙁 )
But one out of 3 aint bad.
I made use of the excellent grandstand. I even managed to haul myself up to the top of it.
Have to admit, while RAF pilots seem to favour showing us the bottom sides of their aircraft, both F16’s showed how it should be done, without compromising safety, giving plenty of topside views and exhilerating aerobatic maneouvers.
Sorry RAF/Navy lads, but they stole the fighter show by quite a distance.
They look pretty good to me!!! 😉 most of the others are kings of the “CROPS ie PHOTO SHOPS” 😉 😉 Anna 😀 :diablo: :diablo: :diablo:
:dev2:
Ahhh how the innocent are deceived.
That’s almost exactly what these are, too, I’m afraid.
Resized and cropped to 800×480, then a bit of colour adjustment and some of them are sharped much more than I would like.
Lovely shots keep them coming !! 😉 🙂 Anna
Thanks, I just wish I had the kind of camera that could make a difference to the quality. I think I’m getting it basically right, but they’re not quite “top notch”. 🙁