Very nice site, keep up the good work 🙂
Can you change the thumbnail selector so you don’t have to click on the arrows all the time? I prefer horizontal scroll bars or pages of thumbnails 😮
I’ll think about this – but I did it that way previously and wasn’t pleased with the results. I can’t say I’m ecstatic about this method either, but it’s a bit neater – the trouble with pages of thumbnails is that they’re all slightly different and I end up with messy looking pages & separate pages popping up for the images, which some browsers may be set to reject these days.
Fantastic isn’t it. I just love wandering round Beijing’s Forbidden City.
It’ll be a shame to see the end of the Jag’s – I would like to feel I played my teeny teeny tiny part when they first started their careers in the early ’70’s, and I wonder if some of them might be allowed to enter into private ownership…. I certainly hope so.
Anyway – nice pics.
Gotta say, the angle you’ve achieved on that Tornado is outstanding. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that angle before, especially not from a ground to air shot. They are GtoA’s aren’t they?
I’ve seen plenty of pictures of aircraft doing rolls, but not from a higher vantage point.
Outstanding.
Sad news, indeed. I read The Big Show at school, in the late 1960’s/early 70’s and it had a big impact on me, then. It must have been abridged at that time. I hope his passing was peaceful, and my commiserations to his family, friends and colleagues.
Do you just want to display pictures, or do you want some sort of online catalogue?
To be honest, I use the simple one offered in MS FrontPage. It works for me, and is flexible in the way it can be used to present the pictures. But there is absolutely no database integration.
I host both the fullsize and thumbnail images on my own resources.
😮
That’ll need a massive runway.
However, first of all I make a copy of my picture, and work on the copy, rather than mess with the original
Firstly, I check my photos to see if they are noisy, and if so run them through something like Neat Image to clean them up. But there is a fine judgement call here, because removing noise can sometimes reduce detail. You should compare it with the original, just to check you aren’t losing too much.
Secondly, I will open my copy picture in something like Paintshop Pro or Photoshop and:
Crop any unnecessary parts of the picture – depending on what my requirements are – to bring out the subject, or for artistic (ha, that’s a laugh with me) reasons – whatever, to improve the final result.
Resize it if it is for posting on a website. In their original format most digital cameras take pictures that are too big for casual use, they will be too big to display comfortably. Chose something like 800x or 1024x
Now I will adjust contrast to bring out or hide detail in the picture, or simply to make it look closer to what I thought I saw myself.
Heighten or reduce colour saturation, again, according to what I feel is best.
Apply a degree of “unsharp mask” to (strangely) sharpen the picture – they’re usually to soft for displaying on a monitor – but always being careful not to overdo it – you can end up with jagged lines, or halos around objects – a bit of a black art this one.
When saving the final result, I try to compress it as much as possible, without losing any detail or introducing any artifacts.
How you do all this will depend on the software you chose, and occasionally I might use other tools at my disposal to improve the picture in other ways.
This is just what I do with a standard picture that I don’t want to alter too much from the original. If I want to do anything else, such as create a collage or mask unwanted parts of the image, then things start getting complicated.
I think that may depend on the level of complexity you require, and whether or not you want to host all the photographs in your own webspace
Not sure about Nick Newns, I didn’t go there with anybody, but I recall meeting another fellow from Plymouth who also posts here, fleetingly. Sorry, I forgot his name (but he knows mine, I guarantee it)!
Weather, as I recall, was changeable – good, bad, good.
Nice photos!!
Peter Vacher’s Hurricane is due to attend this year.
Martin
Cool – fingers crossed for good weather.
Grey trousers, white hat and beer belly?
Or maybe:
Naaa – couple of places that could be either an aircraft or dead pixels, but nothing discernable – the picture’s too fuzzy.
The CC2(N1) looks very interesting – given it’s date, you can’t help but wonder what would have been achieved by further development as technology improved.
Ahh yes, the “Slipstream” movie plane.
What I’m really trying to get at is whether there is any kind of performance advantaged offered, or disadvantage caused, by ducting a piston aero engine.
hehe, I think they’re sold on eBay, aren’t they?