DO NOT USE NORTON DISK DOCTOR OR ANYTHING THAT WILL WRITE TO YOUR CARD
Nothing writes to your card, unless you tell it to – NDD can READ as well, you know.
For goodness sake, do we have to have ridiculous scaremongering like this?
However, I do take your point about that piece of software, it is probably more suitable, as NDD is a generic disk recovery system, primarily designed for hard drives – and as such is flexible, if used correctly – like any competent tool.
I don’t think Peter Norton made a fortune out of making a product that was inherently unsafe – when that is precisely what it is designed to do.
I can be used to read, and write elsewhere, of course.
does anyone have experience of using a third-party recovery service?
Only that it is expensive. But I don’t know of any service that can access corrupt memory cards.
You could try Norton Disk Doctor, if it still mounts as a (albeit unreadable) drive. That should be able to get at the data and may allow you to reconstruct the file allocation table or whatever database it uses to store file positioning information.
The HS125 Dominie is still in service, if that’s what you mean.
There was a static at Culdrose, and I was present when a bigwig from Yeovilton came up and asked them to attend Yeovilton’s show next month.
I tried to persuade them to get it airborne during the show too. It might not be very dramatic, but what is these days?
As a complete amateur – I can assure you “I NEED DIGITAL” without it, I never trusted my camera to either (a) work correctly or (b) take good photos. I could never tell whether my pictures were ruined (and most were) because of me, my camera or the developer. Now I know (all 3), and I’m taking better pics for it.
I don’t get it because it’s simply too expensive for what it offers. Hope one or the other changes.
You’ll definitely need to reinstall it, as when you formatted your hard drive you destroyed the system registry. You can install it over your current installation, and all the planes you have will still be there – a reinstallation at the same place should leave addons untouched.
In my experience, running XP, you have to keep D4 in the drive anyway, I’ve never been able to run it any other way.
But, it beggers the question, why did you have to reinstall XP? In my experience XP has been rock solid (that’s not to say some programs haven’t caused it grief (especially some commercially distributed Visual Basic ones (I’m thinking ESRI Map Explorer 2 here – it simply won’t work with many other VB based programs)).
Wow – you sure we won’t need Cray Supercomputers, or those things they’ve got at the Met office to run it though?
Thanks
Thanks, I think – so is the S7k’s lens actually better than the S5.6k? and the S9k better again?
I guess it’s a stupid question, because other factors come into play. The S7k & S9k are more expensive, and have better CCDs, more pixels, etc.
I have to agree with Rob that cheap printers do not give good results. For £130, however (or cheaper if you shop around) you can get the Epson R320 which is very capable for the price, and will give photographic quality A4 prints (providing the camera quality is 5-Mp or higher at full resolution). Paper and ink is however not cheap. Photobox are one of the best on-line printers, but the results are sometimes disapointing when compared to a good inkjet print. One advantage of the on-line services, is that you do not have to worry about getting the print settings correct.
I can vouch for the Epson Stylus Photo range – some have the added bonus of being able to print directly on to specially prepared (printable) CDs & DVDs, which are only pennies more expensive than ordinary blanks.
Oh, and you can get inks from other sources, which are much cheaper. I haven’t had any problems with 3rd party inks. I use KC-Inks.
Not in stock yet (it’s new) but £259 here:
I’m almost sure it isn’t ’73, ‘cos I’d be in the VC10/Lightning piccie.
The Lightning was in bare metal scheme too, and I don’t recall a VC10 nearby.
I was on the Lightning starter crew. Well – near the Lightning starter crew, would be more accurate.
If you have to do all this to every photo you take.. Then, You either need to change your camera, or learn how to take photographs properly….
1. Cant afford it. 2. Why? Digital enables me to take acceptable pictures without knowing anything. I dont have the money or time for courses. I have enough problems keeping up with my profession.
Finally, note that losses from compression are cumulative – resaving a jpeg over and over again will gradually make the quality worse.
Of course the answer to this is to always keep the original. When you’ve adjusted a picture, save it as a new image in a sub-directory – I usually have the originals at the top level, and create a subdirectory called “modified” or something, and save edited pictures in there. That way I can always start again. Takes up a bit more room, but hard drives and CDRoms are cheap these days.