dark light

RobAnt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,792 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: File Recovery #466359
    RobAnt
    Participant

    DO NOT USE NORTON DISK DOCTOR OR ANYTHING THAT WILL WRITE TO YOUR CARD

    Nothing writes to your card, unless you tell it to – NDD can READ as well, you know.

    For goodness sake, do we have to have ridiculous scaremongering like this?

    However, I do take your point about that piece of software, it is probably more suitable, as NDD is a generic disk recovery system, primarily designed for hard drives – and as such is flexible, if used correctly – like any competent tool.

    I don’t think Peter Norton made a fortune out of making a product that was inherently unsafe – when that is precisely what it is designed to do.

    I can be used to read, and write elsewhere, of course.

    in reply to: File Recovery #466504
    RobAnt
    Participant

    does anyone have experience of using a third-party recovery service?

    Only that it is expensive. But I don’t know of any service that can access corrupt memory cards.

    You could try Norton Disk Doctor, if it still mounts as a (albeit unreadable) drive. That should be able to get at the data and may allow you to reconstruct the file allocation table or whatever database it uses to store file positioning information.

    in reply to: Aircraft in RAF service #1424115
    RobAnt
    Participant

    The HS125 Dominie is still in service, if that’s what you mean.

    There was a static at Culdrose, and I was present when a bigwig from Yeovilton came up and asked them to attend Yeovilton’s show next month.

    I tried to persuade them to get it airborne during the show too. It might not be very dramatic, but what is these days?

    in reply to: Two new SLR's from Canon #466881
    RobAnt
    Participant

    As a complete amateur – I can assure you “I NEED DIGITAL” without it, I never trusted my camera to either (a) work correctly or (b) take good photos. I could never tell whether my pictures were ruined (and most were) because of me, my camera or the developer. Now I know (all 3), and I’m taking better pics for it.

    in reply to: PC Pilot Magazine Accuired by Key Publishing #234570
    RobAnt
    Participant

    I don’t get it because it’s simply too expensive for what it offers. Hope one or the other changes.

    in reply to: FS9 will not launch (FS2004) #234572
    RobAnt
    Participant

    You’ll definitely need to reinstall it, as when you formatted your hard drive you destroyed the system registry. You can install it over your current installation, and all the planes you have will still be there – a reinstallation at the same place should leave addons untouched.

    In my experience, running XP, you have to keep D4 in the drive anyway, I’ve never been able to run it any other way.

    But, it beggers the question, why did you have to reinstall XP? In my experience XP has been rock solid (that’s not to say some programs haven’t caused it grief (especially some commercially distributed Visual Basic ones (I’m thinking ESRI Map Explorer 2 here – it simply won’t work with many other VB based programs)).

    in reply to: BoB II, Wings of Victory is due out shortly. (lots of pics) #234575
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Wow – you sure we won’t need Cray Supercomputers, or those things they’ve got at the Met office to run it though?

    in reply to: Lenses #467104
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Thanks

    in reply to: Lenses #467136
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Thanks, I think – so is the S7k’s lens actually better than the S5.6k? and the S9k better again?

    I guess it’s a stupid question, because other factors come into play. The S7k & S9k are more expensive, and have better CCDs, more pixels, etc.

    in reply to: Photo Printer Advice needed #467267
    RobAnt
    Participant

    I have to agree with Rob that cheap printers do not give good results. For £130, however (or cheaper if you shop around) you can get the Epson R320 which is very capable for the price, and will give photographic quality A4 prints (providing the camera quality is 5-Mp or higher at full resolution). Paper and ink is however not cheap. Photobox are one of the best on-line printers, but the results are sometimes disapointing when compared to a good inkjet print. One advantage of the on-line services, is that you do not have to worry about getting the print settings correct.

    I can vouch for the Epson Stylus Photo range – some have the added bonus of being able to print directly on to specially prepared (printable) CDs & DVDs, which are only pennies more expensive than ordinary blanks.

    Oh, and you can get inks from other sources, which are much cheaper. I haven’t had any problems with 3rd party inks. I use KC-Inks.

    in reply to: Camera choice #467269
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Not in stock yet (it’s new) but £259 here:

    http://www.buyacamera.co.uk/xsearch.asp?RecId=FUJCA460&pt=f

    in reply to: Camera choice #467275
    RobAnt
    Participant

    The Fuji is being updated in a few days to the S5600 – which is infinitely more capable, check it out here

    I’ve found it for £279 – which has to be a bargain for a new camera in this class. Here!

    in reply to: My Grandad's Old Finningley Photos #1342134
    RobAnt
    Participant

    I’m almost sure it isn’t ’73, ‘cos I’d be in the VC10/Lightning piccie.

    The Lightning was in bare metal scheme too, and I don’t recall a VC10 nearby.

    I was on the Lightning starter crew. Well – near the Lightning starter crew, would be more accurate.

    in reply to: JPEG Commpression? #467321
    RobAnt
    Participant

    If you have to do all this to every photo you take.. Then, You either need to change your camera, or learn how to take photographs properly….

    1. Cant afford it. 2. Why? Digital enables me to take acceptable pictures without knowing anything. I dont have the money or time for courses. I have enough problems keeping up with my profession.

    in reply to: JPEG Commpression? #467443
    RobAnt
    Participant

    Finally, note that losses from compression are cumulative – resaving a jpeg over and over again will gradually make the quality worse.

    Of course the answer to this is to always keep the original. When you’ve adjusted a picture, save it as a new image in a sub-directory – I usually have the originals at the top level, and create a subdirectory called “modified” or something, and save edited pictures in there. That way I can always start again. Takes up a bit more room, but hard drives and CDRoms are cheap these days.

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,792 total)