In essence the register of names, relevant qualifications and certifications seems quite a reasonable thing.
As to whether personal addresses being published as opposed to an employment address is acceptable is a completely different matter of personal privacy.
In the UK I hope the database entries will be restricted to include employment addresses only and apart from someone who is self employed using their home as a business address there should be no problem.
I agree that pros should be able to give there business address, private pilots should have the option of not having there address listed.
No the guy is not seeking employment. But he made controversial and I believe specious claims regarding 9/11 and used his supposed status as an aeronautical engineer and commercial pilot to buttress his claims.
A good reason to make such licenses public is that charter company customers might want to check on the people flying them, asking the pilot to show you his license just before take off would be a bit awkward. I don’t see this as being analogous to a drivers license because (in the US at least) virtually every adult has the latter but only a small number (about 0.25%) the former. Unless the person doing the search would spend a lot of time entering random names they would enter names of people who claimed to be a pilot.
Why do you want to consult such a list? Seems rather a strange request.
Because I want to check someones claim to be a UK licensed pilot. I don’t believe him, he also claimed to have worked as a charter pilot in Alaska for about 5 years but is not licensed in the US and claimed to have an aeronautical engineering degree from the University of Edinburgh, but they aparently never taught such a subject let alone offered degrees in it.
I agree that it makes sense that such a database be online but think the lincencee should have the option of not having their address listed.
2 radios too expensive?
Melvin has just about covered it.
I think if I was having difficulty spotting a field I’d use every aid I could to its location.
They may not have ‘switched’ frequency as such. A King Air would almost certainly have two comms sets so it could have been a question of switching radios rather than frequency (Small point, but you might have been considering the distraction of dialling in a frequency?)
Moggy (pilot)
I’m not sure about the 2 radios FAA regulations mandated it have 2 headsets (or a headset and a separate speaker and mike) but only 1 transmitter. 2 transmitters are only required on turbojets that carry >10 PAX. The company didn’t buy “black boxes” because they were “too expensive”.
Len
EDITED – To fix mistakes in the last sentence