Wow, i like it, good effort!:D

Ok, whilst my internet connection actually works i thought i would put these other images on now. These are from some experimentation over the past few days:

put the smoke from eight power station chimneys and sunset light together and you get this

long-ish exposure of a playstation 2 cd draw opening

macro

sunrise over Loughborough

thanks for looking 🙂

Wow BFS, that last Red Arrows shot is my favourite!

Animal pics

Wow Paul, they are all absolute stunners, i couldn’t pick out a favourite, they’re all brilliant! Can’t wait to get over to a zoo myself!

Time for some animal pictures of my own:

classic

Thanks 😀

Every single shot you post, Steph, is amazing. You really know how to take a good photo. I can’t wait to see more additions to the Toulouse diary!

Nice photos Peter, the easyJet is my favourite.

Love the lighting on the landing gear of that last BA there, and that KLM looks like it’s taxying over grass lol.;)

I totally agree. It is impossible to compare two completely different aircraft in terms of the engines they use, the number of seats they have, their likely cruise altitude, as well as whatever extra weight they were carrying on the route. In addition their route length may have been slightly different depending on the approach procedure they used (the 738 could have used RNP approach for example).

As Adam Dowley says, the two calculations are completely different so of course the answers will be different. And the fact that the 757 has a higher number of seats will mean that you have divided the fuel burn down by more anyway.

Indeed the best idea would be to look at the lb per hour fuel burn for the aircraft as a whole, then you will see that the 738 uses a lot less fuel than the 757.