(what is the last mostly UK-led & designed civil aircraft in large-scale use? Isn’t it the BAE 146?).
I think it is the Hawker 800XP, the fuselage and the wings are built in Broughton and the design is also mainly British if I remember correctly. Though final assembly is in the USA. As for subcontractors, well I don’t see a problem in providing wings, engines, landing gears etc… that is all high value and high technology work. Though I agree that we also need a complete systems capability but actually that is imo increasing in the military sector with BAE doing lots in the unmanned sector and AgustaWestland in the UK getting the lead on various new military programmes [Future Lynx, AW149]. Don’t know about the civil sector, I like the F1 though production will mainly be outside of the UK and it’s a small plane.
I thought people would be interested in this. :confused:
More precisely, F136 is a totally unnecessary, US taxpayer-funded social program for the Brit aerospace industry.
And I was under the impression that 80% or so of the work on the F136 is done in the US. :rolleyes: If the F136 is a social programme [though I think retaining it makes sense] then for GE, who would be on the brink of elimination from the military engine business without the F136. This does not apply for Rolls-Royce because, in addition to it’s work on the F136, it has shares in the EJ200 and others. To make it clear: The main reason for saving the F136 was not the US wanting to be friendly to the UK. The main reasons were GE’s long term survival as a military engine supplier, potential procurement savings and operational security.
I get fed up by the arguments made by the CND. What do they suggest we do to rogue states if we give up our nukes? Ask them nicely not to develop their own weapons?
The CND probably thinks all the trouble with North Korea and Iran are exclusively the West’s fault and if we gave up our nukes they’d immediately change and be friendly democracies. :rolleyes:
I hope there’ll be 4 new SSBNs and that Barrow will build them. 🙂 Though don’t forget, what is important is to get BAE doing an all new design, because even if only three are ordered now, the Conservatives are bound to be in power at least once until this programme is finished and they could just order a fourth. 😎
Some positive news:
RIYADH (Reuters) – BAE Systems (BA.L: Quote, Profile , Research) is optimistic about the future of its business with Saudi Arabia, a senior manager said on Saturday, despite reports that the key customer had suspended talks over a multi-billion-pound arms deal.
Damien Turner, Managing Director of BAE Systems Middle East, declined to comment directly on reports by British newspapers that Saudi Arabia had given Britain 10 days to halt a fraud probe or lose a contract for 72 Eurofighter Typhoon combat jets.
But asked whether talks were still on, he said: “Why should they stop? … All business in the Middle East, whether it’s in Saudi Arabia or other locations — and when you are talking about aerospace — is not simple.
“It is not done overnight.”
“These programs have been for a long time in gestation, and they will continue to be that way and we are taking a very long-term view of the future, a positive view,” Turner added.
Turner was speaking to reporters after an upbeat address on the firm’s plans in the kingdom at a conference attended by Crown Prince and Defense Minister Prince Sultan.
Britain said on Friday it would not seek to intervene in the two-year investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) into suspected accounting irregularities related to BAE.
The Daily Telegraph had reported on Thursday that Riyadh had given London 10 days to halt the SFO inquiry or lose the contract for the Typhoons being jointly developed by BAE Systems, Europe’s largest defense firm.
BAE Chief Executive Mike Turner was quoted in the Financial Times earlier as saying talks about the sale of the Typhoons to Saudi Arabia had stalled amid the widening probe into BAE.
SFO initially focused its probe on the relationship between BAE and two small travel firms which made arrangements for Saudi Arabian officials on behalf of BAE.
However, a report earlier this week in the Guardian newspaper said the probe was looking into whether BAE money was channeled to members of the Saudi ruling family.
BAE has repeatedly stated that it was cooperating fully with the SFO and believed that it had done nothing wrong.
Damien Turner said BAE would continue its long-term plans in Saudi Arabia, where it has a wide portfolio of subsidiaries opened in the past few decades after it clinched multi-billion-pound contracts from the world’s top oil exporter.
“It’s still business as usual as far as we are concerned,” he said.
Well we’ll see in ten days, won’t we? Are you seriously saying there is no chance the Saudis will do this? Because they’ve put so much weight behind their position that backing down now would humiliate them to the point no one would ever take a threat like that seriously. I’m not sure the government can offer them a face-saving deal at this point.
Well, I wouldn’t treat everything the Daily Telegraph claims as true. No one has officially confirmed the deadline. We’ll see what happens, but I think it would be a very big [and negative] step by the Saudis to totally break off contacts with the UK and anger the other Eurofighter nations. I’d say the UK-Saudi deal is more likely to be saved than not. Let’s not forget that BAE has a very good relationship with the Saudis and that UK intelligence is very important for the Saudi security services apparently.
Since it sounds like they need replacements in a similar time frame I wonder what the likelihood of a joint US/UK SSBN project be. Thoughts?
Unlikely imo. Britain wants to retain its submarine skills base and with only the SSBN replacement there for the next decade or more to retain design skills it wouldn’t make sense to co-develop it imo. Also there is little chance of cooperation on building because everyone will want to keep their own reactor etc… . So, cooperation perhaps on a very low key components side, but imo nothing major. I’d like to know what the likelihood of a UK developed missile is. 😀 Anyhow, the SSBN replacement should lead to BAE in Barrow-in-Furness recruiting even more people. Their workforce stands at 3500 right now iirc. At the peak of the Vanguard programme in the 1990s the Barrow yard had 14000 employees. Assuming 8 Astutes are built this would mean that the last is delivered in 2021, whilst the first Vanguard (R) [assuming a new SSBN design] would probably be delivered in 2024 or so. With perhaps all boats delivered by 2031 or so. Whatever the timescale is a new SSBN programme is great news for Barrow and will probably lead to their workforce increasing strongly.
I believe to have read that the white paper out on monday afternoon will outline a single option [imo probably new SSBNs with upgraded Trident 2D5 missiles and new British warheads] and that MPs will have a “yes” or “no” vote on it [hopefully and probably they’ll vote overwhelmingly “yes”].
That is about 40 million dollars right? How much did the Norwegians contribute to the Eurofighter?
I could well imagine the CVF order and the Type 45 7&8 order just before the Scottish elections. Just to show “them” what the union is worth to the Scottish economy. :diablo:
I think the UK is still arguing about the tech transfer deal. I know that B&B said it will all be cleared but I believe some problems remain and are still being discussed.
Out of a 29″ inlet, that’s a new world record and by a fair margin.
Good. 😀
I think Norway might well be the first opt out. As for Turkey, apparently the civilian government and the procurement agency favoured a split buy of 80 F35 and about 20 or so Typhoons [the air force does not apparently]. A decision if they should be getting Typhoon in addition to the F35 has not been taken yet. I think it’s time for some phone calls. 😉
@Musashi: Regarding the first 24 Saudi aircraft [the ones getting RAF production slots], the MoD has already said [December 2005] that they will reorder those 24 at the end of Tranche 2.