Well that means no Saudi order for Rafale anyway. Because otherwise they wouldn’t need this deal to say sorry.
Funded by Saudi-Arabia? What is this? A “we’re sorry you lost out to Typhoon” programme by the Saudis?
The T50 nearly bagged the order in early 2005 according to AFM but I’ll go for the BAe Hawk due to industrial offsets and better political ties and the fact that T50 didn’t get the order in early 2005.
Gripen and Super Tucano.
Okay didn’t see the moderators post, sorry for above post.
Rob, this really is a counter-productive argument. But you said it was rediculous, the implication CLEARLY being that you thought it was rediculous for BA to buy Boeing [747s] when it could buy Airbus [A380s].
True. But that does not mean that I hate Boeing! It means that I like/support Airbus [an 80% foreign company!]. I have a neutral view on Boeing [or to be truthful I like any aviation company!]
As I said, if the playing field were TOTALLY level it might be faintly rediculous for BA to go to the US for its aircraft, but the playing field will never will be totally level.
See my second post I made similar remarks there.
BA need to protect their own interests more than they do British manufacturing [of large airliners] – in fact, I suspect that BA employs more people in the UK than does Airbus right now, and that alone suggests they should do what’s best for BA and not what’s best for British airliner manufacturing.
Obviously a large airline based in the UK will have British employees and your point is? Just because they have employees here does not mean they couldn’t do more for Britain. And as I said BA prides themselves buying R-R engines whenever possible because they are British, so why not Airbus aircraft? Are they so bad compared to Boeing? I don’t think so.
Xenophobia suggests putting nationalistic interests above all others – I don’t think that there’s much more to say.
No. Xenophobia means you hate foreigners/foreign products which is not the case with me. I am happy to fly in a Boeing this evening and I love the B787, great plane, but I still think some airlines could buy British aircraft, if the quality gap is not too large. It’s like saying just because I support the England cricket team I’m xenophobic! Ridiculous.
We also have to remember that BA is no longer a state airline but a privatised enterprise.
Yes and that is why I didn’t say they have to do it, I just said I’d like them to do it. [the thing with dropping the B was a joke!] I know very well that they don’t care what I say, I don’t fly with them anyway! 🙂
As to xenophobia, it seems reasonable to make such an accusation if one suggests airlines should place nationalistic preferences above commercial reality. On a totally level playing field, where the 747-800 was identical to the a380, nationalistic preference would be reasonable. However, there is NEVER a totally level playing field and every entirely commercially driven airline will make a true commercial decision.
No, I don’t think so. Supporting your own country is not xenophobic. It is normal everyone does that [so are 6 Billion people xenophobic?] do I have to support foreign manufacturers to be not xenophobic? Nonsense! A person is xenophobic if he attacks foreigners/foreign products verbally or violently just because they are foreign. I didn’t do that. I just stated support for an European aircraft maker [and thus also I expressed support for the 80% of Airbus that is foreign owned.] I’ll continue to support Airbus after BAe sale of the 20% because I’m European. nothing wrong in that. I don’t attack a Scot because he supports Boeing for whatever reasons, that is okay for me.
Besides my second post made my position more clear, but it seems no one read it. :confused:
Get off your high horse.
No one personally attacked you, and accusing us of such is an attack in itself!
I am not accusing more than one person of insults, I’m just accusing you. You called me xenophobic which is clearly an insult.
Your post was xenophobic in the sense that you outright demanded that British Airways, being British, MUST buy British products.
I didn’t say that. Perhaps you ought to read posts carefully before posting insulting replies? I said the British government should force them to drop the B from the name. This was followed by a 😉 Clearly indicating that it was a joke. I then said “no wonder British manufacturing is going down the drain” which is no more than stating that the British industry is not doing too well, obviously also because of a lack of British support for British industry. If I had said they are doing badly due to Boeing “robbing” the UK worker or some such nonsense, that would have been xenophobic, but my only criticism in my post was directed towards British people, hardly xenophobic as I’m half British myself! Besides wanting a company to buy a certain nations product is not xenophobic. Do you know what xenophobic means? It means you are scared of foreigners or things foreign which can lead to hatred of foreigners/foreign things. I have not shown such a thing in any of my posts whilst you have attacked a half-foreigner for stating his opinion. I guess that is what one calls irony.
No one is saying supporting either A or B is wrong.
You said I was xenophobic after I said I supported Airbus, sounds like you’re trying to push me into bad light just for supporting airbus.
P.S. Good that you have understood now that it’s xenophobic and not zenophobic [that would mean dislike/fear of Zen].
I don’t see why supporting Airbus [a company with a very large non British part] is xenophobic? Obviously if those are the standards you apply then supporting Boeing would be xenophobic too. Hundreds of Millions of people in Germany, Britain, France, Japan, USA etc… would be xenophobic because they want their industry to be supported by government/other companies. It’s childish calling people names just because they support a company you don’t like. It’s a real disgrace that one can’t discuss something without being personally attacked, especially as the attack was unprovoked and the insult is absolutely baseless [hell I’m “the Kraut” when I’m in Britain and when I’m in Germany I’m “the Tommy” ;)]. But trying to personally attack someone who is of a differing opinion and who is not supporting your view would be the more xenophobic attitude than just stating support for a country [and certainly not degrading any other country!]. But as you spell it zenophobic [which means dislike of Zen] you might not even know what you were saying and are just using words that sound “cool” to you, so I’ll forgive you. :diablo: 😎 :p
Originally posted by: Bmused55:
So I suppose you think BS should have made do with the lumbering A340-300 then? Or the none performing A340-200 perhaps? Instead of getting the 772ER? A plane known to be far more efficient that any A340 offering.
The days of BA buying solely British are gone. They will buy what fits their needs, regardless of where it comes from. Learn to accept that and move on mate.
I didn’t say BA should be forced to buy anthing, I said they should drop the British Airways brand because it fools people into believing they cared about Britain. Okay I’ll admit it is a bit polemic. 😉 BTW BA has always said they’ll buy R-R engines if possible so why not Airbus [if they offer the same quality]? Besides I am talking about a specific case: A380 with a 40-50% UK content versus B747-8 with about 0% UK content. I don’t see why the A380 doesn’t fit the bill for BA, if Lufthansa,Qantas etc… are buying it for similiar routes. Also a brand new A380 must be better than a redone B747. But me getting heated over this is premature anyway because I believe they’ll go A380 anyway.
Originally posted by Bmused55:
That its a very zenophobic view you have there.
I don’t dislike Zen. :diablo: Or did you mean xenophobic? But I have to disappoint you there too. I didn’t express dislike or hatred of Boeing or the US, I just said I thought British airlines should buy British products, nothing wrong in that. I find it quite funny that patriotism is viewed as being xenophobic. :confused: :rolleyes:
Originally posted by Skymonster:
In today’s highly competitive and narrow-margin airline business, there is no place for patriotism to take precidence over fit-for-purpose. BA will buy what they believe delivers the best return for their business, and if British industry can’t deliver that then British industry deserves not to win the business.
Well it doesn’t seem like Lufthansa, Air France agree, do they? They have large Airbus fleets [yes they have Boeings too] but to me it seems they prefer Airbus if the products are comparable in quality.
P.S. Won’t be able to answer because I’m flying away this evening, on board of a Boeing! 😮 😉
It’s ridiculous! The airline with the “brand” British Airways might prefer to buy an American plane with American engines instead of a partly British plane with British engines. The government should force them to drop the B from their name. 😉 And people still wonder why British manufacturing is going down the drain. 😡
Can’t you guys read? It says far less than 58 Billion Dollars. So why are you calculating with 58 Billion Dollars? :confused:
25? What is the delivery rate per year? 12?
How many Rafales have been delivered in total as of now?