Let’s check the official sites.

SNECMA M88

Consommation spécifique avec PC 1,7 kg/daN.h
Consommation spécifique sans PC 0,8 kg/daN.h

Eurojet EJ200

At its maximum dry thrust of 60kN (or 13,500lbf) the EJ200’s SFC is in the order of 23g/kN.s. With reheat the engine delivers around 90-100kN (or 20,250-22,500lbf) of thrust with an SFC of some 49g/kN.s.

If you translate 23g/kN.s that make 0.83 kg/daN.h
and 49g/kN.s make 1.76 kg/daN.h

Both engines are as efficient (and the M88 a little bit more).

I was right

No, you’re not right, you’re just trying to fool me. 😎 The EJ200 site you quoted is not the official one. I’d believe a German Engineer who actually holds lectures in how to build engines/aircraft anyday over a amateur site.

Here is the official site: http://www.eurojet.de/default2.php?p=4&cid=6

Taking the worst quoted you’re right, taking the best you’re wrong:
sfc 0,756 kg/Nh
sfc AB: 1,692 kg/Nh

Taking the middle:

sfc: 0,792 kg/Nh EJ200 better
sfc AB: 1,728 kg/Nh M88 better

Also considering that EJ200 has a higher bypass ratio I sort of doubt that M88 is better at fuel consumption, especially as the SNECMA figures look “too clean”, i.e. I think they are rounded down e.g. from 1.7245 to 1.7

The CV90 is a swedish tank. So no offset there.

lol actually YES.

Under the agreement, Rolls-Royce will maintain its current lift system component responsibilities beyond System Development and Demonstration into production and sustainment. The work has the potential to bring billions of dollars in new production and spare parts sales to Rolls-Royce over the life of the program. Rolls-Royce produces the LiftFan, Three Bearing Swivel Module and Roll Posts as a subcontractor to Pratt & Whitney.

http://finanzen.net/news/news_detail.asp?NewsNr=373834

And about Congress, we will see.