dark light

Rob L

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Rob L
    Participant

    Sorry Rob, obviously, the tiny chance of the Rafale is still rising a little bit.

    Why is it rising? Having the largest and second most influential Lobby group [Rolls-Royce are No 1] against you isn’t good. 😎

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon's bogus graphic #2579333
    Rob L
    Participant

    And that has what to do with Manching closing early? Besides that restriction is old I think and imposed by people who get money to create restricitons. πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon's bogus graphic #2579366
    Rob L
    Participant

    with a payload that draggy and only 3000L of external fuel, how far can it fly

    Well according to a guy in an Austrian forum who is very well informed [works for Janes] the pilot said that they flew 1 hour [fuel consumption was apparently nearly the same] and then returned to Manching not due to fuel shortage but because Manching closes at night quite early. πŸ™‚

    Rob L
    Participant

    I think any limited chances for Rafale have just decreased:

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000102&sid=a_W1kUNS1VnY&refer=uk

    Rob L
    Participant

    People here are searching what offset could be given, EJ200, helicopteres, etc.

    There is one they forget. AESA radar.

    Let’s tell it strait: European AMSAR project is a joke to get some European fund. The real key words for AESA in Europe are DRAAMA, KORRIGAN, GaN.

    … and it’s French and nobody else in Europe. (sources available if requiered)

    So what about the UK’s Vixen 500E AESA [fighters], what about Seaspray 7000E and Searchwater AESAs [Helicopters], what about the new ARTS AESA for the Tornado. And what about the new Anglo-Italian AESA now in development by Selex? Also actually an AESA was built in Germany sometime ago and shipped for testing to Edinburgh. Do they all use US-made T/R modules?

    And the issue with seeker tech Jonesy has addressed already.

    Rob L
    Participant

    There is a chance the US will call us on the bluff. In which case the politicians will either fold or call Paris – not even the CIA would be able to predict that one!!!.

    Absolutely. That’s why I think there is a small chance that the UK will end up with Rafale. I think the tech issue is very important to MoD/BAe/Whitehall, so they are stepping up the pressure and are imo prepared to go Rafale/or Typhoon N if the US stays convinced that this is a bluff and won’t give the UK tech transfer.

    Rob L
    Participant

    Yeah but the EF weight 20% more
    The SFC is about the same (a little bit better for the M88) so both engine are about as efficient. TDidier is right, it’d just lower the range… now i admit that it’d make a real rocket…

    Actually I thought the EJ200 had a better sfc. I’ll look it up and post it here.

    EDIT: I was right, according to my information [“Flugzeugtriebwerke” by Prof. Dipl.-Ing. BrΓ€unling) the EJ200 has a sfc of 79.2 kg/hkN and M88-2 has 80 kg/hkN.

    Rob L
    Participant

    An Ej-200 in a Rafale would not improve the performances but just give a bigger ass, a lower range and give a black smoke each time he would make a move.

    Huh? And I was under the impression that EJ200 had 20% more thrust in Normal and in after burner mode. πŸ˜‰

    Rob L
    Participant

    Well I it really depends what we get with JSF. I don’t want the UK having to ask LM for upgrades/new weapons every time. This should be done in the UK. I think we should stick to JSF if we get at least the ability to modify/integrate new weapons on JSF in the UK. If it comes to a Rafale buy get only 60-80 for the FAA and get very good offsets.

    Rob L
    Participant

    Licence production is the best way to see the costs skyrocket, but if you’re prepared to pay more for the same thing, why not.
    Source codes are not a problem either. Singapore was supposed to get them all.

    Licence production is no problem if done correctly. For examples see Jaguar for India or Hawk for India. I think it could be done and probably poses less of a risk than integrating EJ200 into Rafale.

    Rob L
    Participant

    Personally, I would love to see the Rafale with RN roundals on them. I think the F-35C with a complete tech transfer would be prefferable, but if not then Rafale is by far the best 2nd option for the UK.

    Yeah I’m sort of warming up to the idea (a little anyway), through this situation we might get a very good deal from whomever wins the “competition”.

    Rob L
    Participant

    Hint at the deal coming ? how proud will the british be with a French fighter in service with their ‘historically France defeating ‘ navy ?

    I don’t think they’d feel bad because they know that they beat them so often. :diablo:

    Also – the JSF F-35 has turned out to be unacceptable because the US have refused to share its technology and software source codes with the British … will the French be prepared to hand over 100% of the Rafale’s technology to the British?? … how would the guys at BAe feel ? would this transfered tech of the Rafale be used on the Typhoon and could this prove a major disadvantage to the Rafale in future tenders where it is pitted against the Typhoon ??

    I think any such deal would include massive offsets with BAe perhaps even producing most Rafales in the UK. [licence prodcution]. If the French don’t give us source codes etc… then the UK might as well buy JSF, so I think full tech transfer would be a given in any such deal.

    IMHO the possibility of this deal coming through is close to 0. IMHO its plain propoganda used bargain with the yanks to push them to accept British terms on to the F-35’s tech transfer and the RR partnered engine for the same.

    Probably, but perhaps the Americans will feel too sure of this being a trick and then the UK would go for Rafale. You see perhaps the tech transfer issue is really an absolute NO GO sign for UK government and sovereign modifications on aircraft is extremyl important to them.

    in reply to: Tornado GR4 demonstrator to get AESA radar [ARTS] #2583585
    Rob L
    Participant

    @SteveO: AFAIK Typhoon will not replace the Tornado GR4s at all. Tornado GR4 will go on till about 2018 and then will be replaced by whatever has replaced FOAS. [Raven UCAVs anyone? ;)]

    in reply to: BAe details even more UCAV/UAV work #2585852
    Rob L
    Participant

    Well BAe’s stealth UAVs are very advanced they have stealth, size and autonomy. The Dassault UAVs don’t have autonomy and are IIRC smaller. [assuming Raven has a wingspan a bit shorter than the 10 Metres quoted for corax] Filur has stealth and autonomy but it’s very small.

    P.S. You forgot BAe Kestrel, the predecessor to Raven. πŸ˜€

    in reply to: BAe details even more UCAV/UAV work #2585982
    Rob L
    Participant

    Yeah I agree it looks terribly cool. Apparently BAe/MoD are negotiating if the new UCAV work should be full scale with internal weapons bay etc…. Perhaps a larger Raven?

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 488 total)