dark light

Rahul M

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2427839
    Rahul M
    Participant

    In the interests of continuing this discussion, I would refer you to this article by Admiral (Retd.) Nadkarni. While I may not agree with all his assessments and some of his views have been overtaken by history, at least he presents – what is to me, a much more coherent analysis of the facts than the overly rosy picture that you presented – if you’re willing to look at a different point of view.
    If not….well – let’s agree to disagree
    http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/jan/13nad.htm

    I’m not in the business of painting pictures my dear, whether rosy or orange flavoured. I gave you the facts, you couldn’t digest it and went along throwing a tantrum.

    now, in 2009, Adm Nadkarni’s article would be a GREAT embarrassment to the person himself, given how far off he was in his predictions and projections in 2001. if half of what se said came true you would surely have read his columns castigating LCA program in the intervening years. the very fact that his pen has been silent this last 8 years is ample proof that he was wrong.

    it has been rebutted often times, this is just one example http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-5/narayanan.html

    just FYI, the author is a respected academic of the subject himself. google him up if you want to.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2427844
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Sort of like yours you mean? More than happy to have admins do the necessary checks.

    dear dharmaputra yudhisthir, since when do you lord over the mods here ? 😮

    didn’t know you are a super-mod here.

    My response to Rahul’s post was in response to his sarcastic response implying that my daring to question the overbudget status of the LCA project was a hatchet job. This is a forum and should have room for, nay encourage dissent, expressing which shouldn’t be jumped on by one group as a sign of trolling or flaming. I thought the whole reason we espoused a democratic society was to encourage a plurality of opinons and not have the forum hijacked by one aggressive group.

    ho ho ho !
    that was “you” questioning the LCA status ? why do I get the impression that it is a copy-paste from a blog post from a loony website called merinews ? http://www.merinews.com/article/iaf-cant-rule-skies-with-engineless-swadeshi-tejas/133414.shtml
    the contributor’s there are “citizen journalists”, IOW they are not even accredited journalists but unknown people writing under assumed names. their “original opinion” and “invention of facts” might be of interest to a troll like you but not to anyone else.

    the information I gave comes from Air Marshal Philip Rajkumar, ex-IAF, a well-respected test pilot who led CLAW development of LCA on behalf of IAF and went on to become director of the ADA after retirement.

    I know whose information to believe. you are free to believe any old nutcase from merinews or rupeenews but kindly don’t bring that garbage here.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2427955
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Fair point, it does give an option.

    especially in NE where it may not be possible to provide tanker support till well into the next decade when the fleet expansion takes place.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2427957
    Rahul M
    Participant

    >> sorry but no. this was all we got from a member at BRF.

    >> not many, around 10 I think. don’t remember exact figures.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428008
    Rahul M
    Participant

    to add to that, a number of the tech that will go into MCA is already ready or will be by the time the project starts viz. FBW (unless they go for FBL), glass cockpit/HMDS, composites, radar etc.

    unlike when the LCA started there is no need for a TD phase anymore, IAF itself understands that quite well.

    On the second sentence, how can you so confidently say?

    if you want to see an exact quote I can’t, I’m just extrapolating assuming IAF to be a rational player. 🙂

    in reply to: Sepecat Jaguar #2428011
    Rahul M
    Participant

    yeah, he did mention it didn’t work too well. did you watch vishnu som’s program on 10 years of kargil war ? they mentioned that many of the LGBs had to be tossed to targets which themselves were at a higher altitude than the operational envelope of the LGB (18 k feet IIRC) ! and to think that the actual toss happened from a height of at least 3-4000 feet over that !

    Most interestingly, the IAF demonstrated stand off lasing via UAVs at a firepower demo where a MiG-27 UPG took out a target designated by a Searcher.

    interesting ! which demo, which UAV and which LGB ? also, which LGBs are the jags cleared for ?
    TIA.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428032
    Rahul M
    Participant

    X-post.

    SHAR on INS Viraat, possibly the first pics of LUSH.
    http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/9388/getimagebm.jpg

    note the dual rail launchers. ID the missiles.

    image courtesy, K_Rohit @ BR.

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2012843
    Rahul M
    Participant

    SHAR on INS Viraat, possibly the first pics of LUSH.
    http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/9388/getimagebm.jpg

    note the dual rail launchers. ID the missiles.

    image courtesy, K_Rohit @ BR.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428033
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Save your sarcasm for others of your ilk who have their heads perpetually buried in the sand and function in the belief that if a viewpoint doesn’t agree with yours – its a hatchet job!

    If there’s any hatchet job its a reverse hatchet job that only the blindly partisan rah rah conmen like you have been inflicting on the Indian public!

    I’m not wasting time or bandwidth to contradict you – if you don’t like my opinion – I’m happy to have you disagree.

    aha, it comes down to personal attacks as soon as the edifice of fantasy has been knocked down with facts ! :rolleyes:
    so predictable !

    Save your sarcasm for others of your ilk who have their heads perpetually buried in the sand and function in the belief that if a viewpoint doesn’t agree with yours – its a hatchet job!

    as against you and your ilk that has to crawl into every IAF thread uninvited and flame away ?

    I’m happy to have you disagree.

    I’m happy to have got under your skin ! :dev2:

    if my post brings out an acerbic reaction from trolls and flamers like you, it means I’m doing something right ! 😉

    in reply to: Sepecat Jaguar #2428066
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Am not sure whether that was the Atlis?
    Anyways more of a trial attempt than anything.

    LGBs got properly added to the Jag arsenal (Indian) post Kargil, with the Israeli Griffin & US Paveway both being included.

    as per Rupak, so I’m ready to trust that one.

    in reply to: Sepecat Jaguar #2428102
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Not only did the stingers have the advantage of being fired from elevation , but firing in that atmosphere also increased the engagement envelope of the weapon..that is something the IAF hadnt considered before the start of operations.

    and the low temp background increased the sensitivity of the seeker.

    BTW, the jaguar did have one PGM strike in kargil to its credit using the ATLIS pod.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2428103
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Russia to commence flight tests of FGFA

    Moscow: Russia will soon flight-test the fifth generation fighter aircraft (FGFA), which is developed along with India, a senior cabinet member said here today.

    zeenews is as usual confusing issues. the 2-seat FGFA is not ready yet and is a long time away from roll-out, let alone flight.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428108
    Rahul M
    Participant

    is it too much to expect that people will write clearly understandable sentences ?
    your sentence still doesn’t make sense.

    navyman, AoA reached is 20 deg by july 2008 according to LCA Program Director PS Subramanyam as against IOC requirements of 22 deg.

    if anyone has the “High AoA testing for LCA” article saved please upload it. the link has gone dead.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428120
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Can you give me a source on this. It is still at 6.5gs i think reached limit.

    err, what does this sentence mean ? please rephrase.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2428127
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Similarly, MCA will go through this.

    very unlikely. India’s aeronautics industry has matured enough with the LCA and associated projects that a sequential time wasting development profile is not preferable. if the MCA is sanctioned (earliest by 2013-14 IMHO), expect it to be a full-fledged fighter project from the start.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 308 total)