dark light

Rahul M

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Possible futire Air wars #2452691
    Rahul M
    Participant

    😀

    I have to smile about that school. You can develop as much tactics as you like with little help from that. All that ideas are related to an opponent, who is willing to play to the rules set by you. The most intresting part is to operate your airforce and the related missions in that way, that your opponent is unable to refuse it. It seems, that such a school did teach enough tactics to choose from, when the behavior of the opponent is learned in short notice and enough flexibility allowed to adopt to that.
    In the skirmishes between the IAF and PAF the exchange ratio was around 1:1 so far , despite contradicting claims.
    😉

    I suppose you would be kind enough to post in english whatever you tried to convey by the above passage. :rolleyes:
    thank you.

    in reply to: Possible futire Air wars #2452739
    Rahul M
    Participant

    They showed a mix of British, French and Russian style.

    :rolleyes: right ! I’m sure IAF learnt all about british and french fighter tactics w/o any contact worth the name for about 30 odd years.
    this is the school that develops IAF tactics :
    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/Sqn/TACDE.html

    in reply to: Chinese Shenzhou 5 launched around 9pm EST #2468893
    Rahul M
    Participant

    I like the word “taikonaut” as it separates themselves from astronauts and cosmonauts rather well. Now when another country joins the space race ghetto style we can label them accordingly.

    they could have done without the naut. surely chinese has an appropriate synonym.

    in reply to: MiG-31/25PD vs F-4E #2469081
    Rahul M
    Participant

    all the russians sources and accounts i have read up to now, do not support that, the F-15 was the only MiG-25 killer and only 2 aircraft were shot down

    could be. I don’t have a way to figure out, I don’t know russian.
    this is one source that supports my point.

    http://www.spyflight.co.uk/foxb.htm

    Four Foxbat-B’s, along with Soviet pilots and technicians, were ‘detached’ to a couple of friendly countries – Algeria and Vietnam. The first actual exports occurred in 1982 when eight Foxbat-B’s were sold to India, these aircraft are operated by a special flight of 106 Sqn at Uttar Pradesh airbase and are usually targeted against Pakistan. Foxbat-B’s have also been supplied to Iraq, Syria, Libya and Syria.

    The MiG-25B’s were operated from Syria bases from late 1975, initially with Soviet pilots and ground crew. On 13 Feb 81 two Israeli RF-4F’s flew a high-altitude reconnaissance mission over the Lebanon designed to lure the Syrian Foxbat’s into the air. However, as the two Syrian Foxbat’s climbed towards the RF-4F’s, they withdrew at high speed dispensing chaff and jamming the Foxbat’s radar with their ECM pods. As the Syrian pilots attempted to catch the Israeli aircraft, the trap was sprung. Two Israeli F-15A’s were directed onto the Foxbat’s either by ground radar or by a patrolling E-2C Hawkeye and fired AIM-7F Sparrow missiles at the aircraft. One Foxbat was destroyed but one managed to escape. The Israeli’s repeated this ‘entrapment’ on 29 Jul 81 and destroyed another Syrian Foxbat. On 31 Aug 83 another Syrian Foxbat was damaged by a specially modified Israeli Hawk SAM and subsequently dispatched by an F-15A.

    btw, if that was what the foxbats did, doesn’t this mean they had some rudimentary A2A capability at the very least ?

    in reply to: MiG-31/25PD vs F-4E #2469667
    Rahul M
    Participant

    the israelis have kills against syrian foxbats with phantoms IIRC.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470156
    Rahul M
    Participant

    so what are you people’s candidates for the heavy lift choppers of IAF ?

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470235
    Rahul M
    Participant
    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470457
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Mirage-2000’s were primarily for SEAD.

    they were bought for protecting NCR from f-16 attack. while their focus has become more multi-role over the years, it’s not exclusively SEAD.
    also, IAF’s primary SEAD weapons, the ARMs are of russian origin.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470469
    Rahul M
    Participant

    they are supposed to check the machines early next year. decision would come by the end of the year, hopefully ! :rolleyes:

    anyway, the favourites are the euro birds and shornet with engines being the pro factors for the euro birds and nuke deal for the shornet.

    mig-35 and gripen have outside chance and f-16 has as much chance of winning MRCA contract as I have of winning a fields medal ! 😉
    (which is zero BTW, in case you are wondering ! :p )

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470479
    Rahul M
    Participant

    what has india done with its Mig-25s ? are they still flying? what types did they have? did they see any combat like IRAF Mig-25s?

    they were all recon birds with a couple of U’s.
    they didn’t see any combat in that sense and were anyway inducted after the last full fledged war in 1971.
    the foxbat is unofficially credited with photo runs(more than one IIRC) over islamabad in the 90’s.
    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/Aircraft/Foxbat.html

    In 1997, an IAF Foxbat famously darted into Pakistani airspace and its sonic boom alerted ground radars into action. But zooming back towards the Indian border, the Foxbat was just a blur to Pakistani air defence missiles and F-16s scrambling up from Sargodha. Pak says the MiG-25 pilot deliberately gave out aircraft signature to remind PAF it had no equal in its inventory.

    covered here in API
    http://vayu-sena.tripod.com/other-1997mig25-1.html

    Last May (1997), an Indian Force (IAF) Mikoyan MiG-25RB Foxbat-B reconnaissance aircraft created a furore when the pilot flew faster than Mach 2 over Pakistani territory following a reconnaissance mission into Pakistan airspace. The Foxbat broke the sound barrier while flying at an altitude of around 65,000 feet, otherwise the mission would have remained covert, at least to the general public. The Pakistan Government considered the breaking of the sound barrier as deliberate: to make the point that the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has no aircraft in its inventory which can come close to the cruising height of the MiG-25 (up to 74,000 feet).

    However, from one of PAF’s Forward Operating Bases, radar traced the intruder and the F-16As scrambled. Sources in the PAF said that there was no need to intercept a plane flying at the altitude of 65,000 feet as the F-16 can reach an operating ceiling of 55,000 feet.

    they were retired in 2006 with a farewell ceremony.
    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/AirfieldVisits/Foxbats/

    in reply to: Real air combat #2471221
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Im talking about that pilot. I think he claimed 24 mile range with his eyes? But im not sure on that as it was a long time ago and I wasn’t paying that much attention. 🙂

    ah found him on wiki. giora epstein.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giora_Epstein

    in reply to: Real air combat #2471383
    Rahul M
    Participant

    If you believe Israeli pilots during the 6-day war – they claimed their eye sight could only be measured by the radar. 😀

    there was one such ace pilot I think. saw his interview on dogfights.
    were there others ?

    in reply to: Aviation trip to Gelendzhik & Moscow #2472760
    Rahul M
    Participant

    super ! thanks !

    in reply to: EJ200 thrust vs. altitude #2474204
    Rahul M
    Participant

    get well soon ! :dev2:

    in reply to: EJ200 thrust vs. altitude #2474241
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Sukhoi was indeed not even invited.:rolleyes::diablo:

    the presence of the MKM nearby had absolutely nothing to do with it ! 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 308 total)