I mean comments like these!
HuntingHawk I don’t ignore anything, we have a system which you can follow if you don’t succeed at first.
please forgive me if I don’t have unlimited sangfroid, especially when packs of trolls regularly wreck India related threads and moderators respond by closing their eyes towards their efforts and to top it all an otherwise valuable thread gets ‘hidden’ as punishment, which is precisely what the trolls were after in the first place.
effectively, this means that India related threads are fair game, the trollers will also enjoy some amount of protection to do their activity.
there’s a much easier if less politically correct way of doing this, you can simply say that India related threads are not welcome on keypubs.
I know that this is perhaps not deliberate policy but if you bother to check the history of past few IAF threads this is certainly how things evolved.
dude, check the range of Brahmos. Unless you are interested in hitting Buddhist temples, there really isn’t a lot of point using Brahmos against China at the moment.
so PLA has dropped all infantry, armour and tube/rocket artillery and depends exclusively on jet pack attached flying robots these days ? :rolleyes:
are you sure there won’t be any ammo/fuel dumps, brigade command nodes, AD radars and missiles, arty bases etc within 250 km of the Indian border ?
Can brahmos carry some sort of air burst munitions for area denial and attacking tank and infantry formations ? Its speed, accuracy and maneuverability would make is a great platform to carry different types of warheads not designed for conventional CM use ??
it will be too costly to use for those targets. rest of the ideas you are spot on. the block II is specifically designed to take out permanent high value targets.
4th-gen planes are Drag-optimized(low stealth) and 5th gen planes are Stealth optimized(higher drag).
not so simple as that. any lowering of aerodynamic qualities (which isn’t huge to begin with. maintaining this balance is a big part of 5gen aircraft designing) is more than offset by the full internal weapons carriage. all 4gen fighters, however well finished their profiles might be, pay a hefty penalty for all those stores and EFTs hanging outside.
as for kaveri-M-88, you are assuming they will produce an engine of the same class. if the demands are of a higher powered engine kaveri folks will know that quite well, better than the EJ walas and will design it accordingly.
it will be major work no doubt, but this project is supposed to be a major one, not just an improvement of what’s already in place.
Thats an awesome picture (wish it was a little more higher resolution and without center watermark).
Do you guys know what the serial number stands for?
KH-T 2009
i guess T is for Trainer and 2009 is for the year it was built. Will this be inducted in the operational service with same number?The gray scheme on LCA really makes it look better. Perhaps a little lighter would be even better.
Also, i have asked before about this in past, does anyone have specs for twin seater?
all LCA aircrafts till date have the KH series designation, starting with the first specimen, TD-1, which was KH-2001. KH stands for Dr Kota Harinarayana who was program director, LCA. this designation was started at the behest of Air Marshal Philip Rajkumar who was then in overall charge of flight tests and validation of control laws for LCA.
rest, as you say, T for trainer and 2009 for the year it first flew.
Will this be inducted in the operational service with same number?
hard to say but probably yes.
Also, i have asked before about this in past, does anyone have specs for twin seater? it is more less same as that of the single seater. the rear seat is added by replacing about 80 kg of internal fuel IIRC.
I didn’t mean flamebaiting yourself, I meant sending a PM to one of the moderators.
I didn’t mean flamebaiting myself too. I said
……..but you never reported…….
I did. a number of times in the first few pages. since nothing was done I didn’t bother any more. please do check the closed/deleted reports.
I suppose this
is used to report disrupting posts ?
so unless reporting button is used to flamebait around here, I’m at a loss to understand your comment.
regards.
Seems strange to me that you make a big deal out of this now but you never reported any of these flamebaiting posts before the thread got out of hand?
I did. a number of times in the first few pages. since nothing was done I didn’t bother any more. please do check the closed/deleted reports. when I requested the mods to look into the posting pattern of certain members my post got deleted.
Deino, I think you will love this ! 😉

The EU has a considerably higher GDP then the United States, if it were a nation it would be the richest in the world. ‘Not having the money’ is different from not being willing to spend it on certain things.
but it is NOT a nation. there lies the problem.
I used the one picture where the plane is shown taxing, from the side, and there are a bunch of people arond it, in front, behind it, etc. From so many people one can deduce the average height. Now *IF* the average height is 1.80 meters, then the plane seems to be around 18 meters long, from the tip of the nose (without the pitot tube) to the tip of the tail sting. Also, it would appear height from the landing gear tyres to the tip of the vertical stabilizators is some 4.7 meters. Now, if we take those values for granted and use them on the picture where we have the plane flying in the air, seem almost from above, we can kind of deduce the wingspan – which would be around 14 meters.
Comments?
good job.
assuming you are correct in the measurements, these are the flanker figures for comparison.
* Length: 21.9 m (72 ft)
* Wingspan: 14.7 m (48 ft 3 in)
* Height: 5.92 m (19 ft 6 in)
as this bird is smaller, looks slimmer than the flanker and uses quite a lot of composites by comparison, I would wildly guess its empty weight will be around 13-14 t to the su-27’s 16+, which fits in with the statement that it’s weight will be more than mig-29 (11 t) but less than flanker.
ok,
i can see that some people think that Europe is now bankrupt and that there will be no new airframe development for decades (which is how long it would take to field a new system by the way, I’m not expecting a pan-european agreement to be signed tomorrow!!!).
Essentially you are saying that the swedish, french and Eurofighter nations will stop producing aircraft at the cutting edge and make do with system upgrades…?
I think Typhoon and Rafale in their ultimate forms will be very competitive but not in 12-15 years time, when the F35B will be ubiquitous and PAK-FA technology fielded by Russian, China (if they haven’t got their own programme up and running yet) and India. Not to mention potential Korean or Japanese systems.
In your world Europe will not be able to compete?
europe will likely skip the manned 5-gen development cycle and jumo to stealthy unmanned ones.
So does Paralay 😉
:diablo:
congrats !
this situation won’t have happened if repeated trolling and flamebaiting by a few members were disallowed in the first place.
doping nothing against the disruptors and ‘punishing’ the regular contributors by hiding the thread sounds like strange policy.
Stratfor: Indian dream fading
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nhvZyjCFqE
Dr.Friedman knows what he’s talking about.
does he ? then how come the year went in the complete opposite direction of his prediction for the Indian economy ?
^^ ability to operate from semi-prepared air strips. 2 wheels = less pressure = less chance your front wheel gets stuck or bursts.