dark light

Rahul M

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan Air Force II #2424878
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Especially since everyone can see on this forum that the two countries’ supporters behave completely identical :diablo:

    really Arthur ? pakistani forumites disrupt the IAF thread on a regular basis (unprovoked at that) while the reverse does not happen. how many times have the Indian members barged in the PAF thread with the intention to derail/lock it ?
    extending your logic there is no difference among terrorists and law enforcement agencies as well since both use violence and are therefore ‘completely identical’.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force II #2424880
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Looking forward to evidence. 😉 BTW Indian P8 are history. Atleast get some facts correct.

    I won’t have posted on an India issue in a pak thread but since you don’t care I’ll expose your ignorance/lies once again.

    BTW Indian P8 are history.

    proof please.:dev2: else you are nothing but a source of hot-air on this forum. taking potshots and inventing fictitious information is all you do.

    this is from today.
    http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100103/jsp/nation/story_11936636.jsp

    Early last year, India also contracted Boeing-made P8I maritime surveillance aircraft.

    5 January 2009,
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India_inks_largest-ever_defence_deal_with_US/articleshow/3934357.cms

    NEW DELHI: The UPA government has quietly gone ahead and signed the biggest-ever defence deal with US: a $2.1 billion contract for eight Boeing P-8I long-range maritime reconnaissance (LRMR) aircraft for Navy.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force II #2425230
    Rahul M
    Participant

    The American taxpayer?

    I don’t think uncle sam will pay for turkish goodies.

    we know that pak is interested in mangusta and cobras. till now no interest shown in the WZ-10. which means it isn’t up to scratch, for even the J-10B isn’t ready yet (forget that, even the basic J-10 isn’t in PAF service) but PAF is already talking of J-10B with AESA and all kinds of bells and gizmos.
    the implication being that if there was even an inkling of the WZ-10 we would have heard of it from pak sources.

    that leaves the mangusta and the AH-1. US will only pay for american military hardware, especially in current economic situation. pak OTOH probably wants the more modern mangusta, ostensibly because that will allow chinese experts to have a look. otherwise mangusta makes no sense for a military used to operating free AH-1’s.
    given the close relationship between those two countries, it’s plausible.
    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/10/01/332941/atak-team-outlines-progress-of-turkeys-t129-project-after-first-flight.html

    TAI general director Muharrem Dortkasli says the first T129 ATAK will be handed over to the Turkish armed forces in the third quarter of 2013. Turkey will be responsible for international marketing and sales of the design, and industry sources say several countries are already evaluating the product, including Jordan and Pakistan.

    it’s likely that china will also fund the acquisition program if it allows chinese experts a closer look at something like the mangusta. it will also help the faltering WZ-10 on it’s way.
    in time we might even see china replacing US as pakistan’s primary sponsor. in such a situation china funding weapons for pak forces if it also helps its own projects is very likely.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force II #2425249
    Rahul M
    Participant

    we also heard noises of the turkish versions of the mangusta. wonder who will pay for all this.

    Rahul M
    Participant

    misraji, LCA –> 2 intakes feed 1 engine

    for the ones you mention, J-10, much larger engine, mig-29,F/A-18, 1 of those intakes for 1 LCA equivalent engine each.

    Rahul M
    Participant

    If someone cannot explain the need of LCA after HAWK as AJT then it is called trolling/flaming if one asks questions. I still see no need for LCA as AJT.

    what a surprise ! I bet you see no need for the LCA as well or even the IAF itself, yet that is not how things actually are. 😀

    this is the reality, deal with it. 😉

    ————-

    people, we really should stop answering to the trolls. their only objective is to derail/lock this thread. I suggest we restrict the replies to people who have genuine questions and ability to discuss (zero, vikasrehman etc).

    Rahul M
    Participant

    I am still trying to figure the sarcasm part. All the time I have been asking for this:

    no sir, you haven’t. you queried if weapons training formed a part of Stage III to which I said yes. sarcasm (or the lack of it) lies in asserting someone has failed to do something that he/she didn’t attempt in the first place.

    I assumed it was common knowledge. apparently not.

    It is only now you are producing this.

    because it is only now you have asked. 😉

    Rahul M
    Participant

    Rahul M,

    That still does not prove that stage 3 training requires weapons training.

    zero, I’ve already said that Stage III includes weapons training. if you want proof all you have to do is ask. sarcastic comments are unnecessary when I haven’t attempted to prove anything in the first case, merely provided the information. if you want proof, you ask for it and it will be provided.

    it’s afterall a little tiring to always to produce links every time one says something, unless requested.

    anyway, here you go http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/AirfieldVisits/MOFTU/

    Semester 2 commences after 6 months and continues with more advanced flying. The basic principals of ground attack, air combat training, advanced air combat and live firing are taught to the flying officers. 28 sorties are completed in the Mig21U trainer and a further 70 are completed on the Mig 21FL. During the live firing phase, sorties are flown to the Dolungmurgh Range, 125 kms to the North East of Tezpur. This range is shared with Chabua and Mohanbari, and the aircraft adhere to strict slot times over the target.

    Originally Posted by zero
    AFIK, Stage 3 is type conversion. Its basically for going supersonic and specific. AJT is for advanced, but, subsonic training.

    do you know what ‘operational conversion’ or ‘type conversion’ means ?

    wiki for instance, says :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_conversion_unit
    An Operational Conversion Unit (OCU) is a unit within an air force whose role is to support preparation for the operational missions of a specific aircraft type by providing trained personnel.

    is it at all possible that IAF trains pilots for ‘type conversion’ for mirage2000, mig-29, mig-27, jaguar, su-30mki, mig-21 (also mig-23 in near past) on mig-21 sqdns ?? 😮
    in that case what is the purpose of the couple of 2 seat “type trainers” that are present in every operational squadron ? (mirage-2000TH in mirage sqdns, Jaguar IBs in jag squadrons, Mig-29KUB in mig-29 sqdns, mig-23UM in mig-27 sqdns and so on)
    OCU (operational conversion unit) flying mig-21’s is the IAF’s only dedicated operational conversion unit and is used to ‘convert’ pilots for flying mig-21’s and also cover basic part of a fighter pilot’s MOFT(mig operational flying training) syllabus.
    NOTE : MOFT syllabus is carried out at more than one place or one unit. after classroom instructions, the initial AJT equivalent training is carried out on Mig-21U’s at various places.
    MOFTU caters almost exclusively to the semester two of MOFT, which is primarily dedicated to fighter tactics, IOW LIFT.

    MOFTU is NOT an OCU for mig-21 or otherwise, it trains pilots in LIFT role who then go on to the fighter squadrons flying every fighter aircraft in IAF inventory.

    BTW both AJT and type converter have weapons training capabilities.

    there is absolutely NO comparison between a type conversion aircraft and an AJT !! a fully combat capable supersonic LIFT you may compare to either but most certainly you can’t compare the hawk AJT (calling it a LIFT is a stretch for current gen aircraft) with the jaguar IB for instance, which is a fully combat capable aircraft in its own right.

    You can even arm a BJT.

    I can also arm a cessna but I’m not sure what purpose that will serve. same with arming BJTs.

    But, IAF requires it or not is not clear.

    and this conclusion is based upon ? I can argue that IAF doesn’t need an AJT as well, seeing that it operated without one for a long time ! 🙂

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2425440
    Rahul M
    Participant

    beautiful shot !

    anyone has anything on BAF ? bangladesh air force ?
    TIA.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force II #2425452
    Rahul M
    Participant

    Example on case. No onereally knows how capable the next Chinese stealth fighter will be.

    talk about being ironic ! 😀

    Rahul M
    Participant

    The question rephrased.

    Fighter conversion type is definitely required. I wanted to ask if the LIFT part is needed or not. Any one knows what is the broad Stage III requirements? Does it include weapons practice? MOFTU was equipped with MiG-21 FL’s which were fighter aircrafts.

    yes zero, I think I already answered that. I’ll try to explain again.

    Current process

    Stage I (primary flight training and basic aerobatics using props)

    Stage II (basic jet training)

    Stage III (advanced jet training) (assuming MOFTU is no longer used which is not true, yet)

    Op Conversion (basic fighter tactics, including weapons training and conversion on the type)
    ————————

    The thing is, the basic fighter tactics which will be taught using type trainers is something that can be taught more efficiently and economically using a LIFT. using the senior operational pilots in the squadrons for providing basic fighter tactics on the 2-seat type trainers (which are beaten up as it is and spend up life at a ferocious pace) is a waste of precious resources. with a LIFT in place, IAF can provide training in basic fighter tactics at the LIFT stage itself and then use the type trainers in its operational squadrons for conversion and advanced training on the type.
    in fact, this is exactly what IAF did for the past 3 decades ! (remember, the mig-21FL’s of MOFTU are not even 2-seat trainers !!)
    the only catch was that IAF didn’t have a AJT to take care of the stage between the intermediate jet training (Stage II using HJT-16) and LIFT (MiG-21FL @ MOFTU).

    [QUOTE]

    Unless Im mistaken IAF’s fighter pilot training used to have basic and intermediate tarining before the pilots were shipped to Mig-21 twin seaters for converison. Hawk is filling the advanced training void that was criticised for several years. I wonder if IAF trainee pilots are still being sent to Mig-21 units prior to being sent to any other units, or do they go to different squadrons (for conversion) after finishing their AJT course?

    pilots go to the squadrons directly after hawk training.
    going to the MOFTU in between is not an option at all. the MOFTU mig’s are really old and beaten up and numbers have come down significantly over the years. between them and the 25 odd hawks IAF has barely adequate numbers to train all its fighter pilots. so hawk–> MOFTU is not an option even if they wanted it.

    Rahul, I skimmed through a couple of sites about USAF & RAF training, and it appears (if Im missing anything important please correct me) US fighter pilots get their basic training on T-6 (or T-34 for navy), then they move to T-38 for advanced training before they go to the relevant squadron for conversion.

    AFAIK, they go to AT-38B for weapons training after completing the T-38 course and before moving on to operational squadrons.
    as for USN it also has to do with the fact that the pilots from the same training stream also goes on to flying slower prop aircraft. it makes no sense to train them on supersonic trainers.

    What Im wondering about is how would a 4 stage IAF programme (as in the post quoted above) before conversion training compares with other AFs around the world???

    as for other AF’s, by itself that comparison counts for little. heck, the IAF actually managed without AJTs for near about 3 decades ! that’s a much more difficult thing to do by any comparison ! I doubt you can find another AF that has done that as well ?

    of course, a capable supersonic jet trainer (unlike the hawk) can well merge the AJT+LIFT roles with minor variations in variants. clearly, the hawk doesn’t cut it for IAF.
    a tejas or a derivative would do nicely in that role.

    Rahul M
    Participant

    Does LIFT need exists.

    yes, very clearly it exists. in the absence of a proper AJT/LIFT aircraft, IAF compromised with MOFTU.

    it has the Hawk now but is clearly disappointed with it. many future air forces will be moving towards supersonic jet trainers, viz. korean T-50 (which is generating interest from many AFs including the israeli AF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-50_Golden_Eagle#Operators), hongdu L-15 etc. I’m sure PAF would have gone for L-15 if it could afford it. who knows it may well want a few in the future. some people would have been singing a very different tune then ! :dev2:

    of course, the USAF has been using supersonic jet trainers for a long time now, the T-38 which itself was derived from an aircraft of the LCA’s weight class, the F-5. the USAF fighter pilots train on the T-38 (AJT stage) and then go on to the AT-38 for weapons training (similar to LIFT stage)

    so, yes I do think the need exists.

    —————
    coming to the IAF in particular, current fighter pilot training looks like

    HPT-32 –> HJT-16 –> Hawk/MOFTU (there aren’t enough hawks AFAIK) –> Conversion training in sqdns

    the future would ideally look like
    HTT-40/some other turbo trainer –> HJT-36 –> Hawk/LCA derived trainer –> LCA LIFT(filling in for MOFTU) –> Conversion training in sqdns

    Rahul M
    Participant

    I wonder what will be their use.

    LIFT–> lead in fighter trainer
    in IAF mig-21Fls of MOFTU (Mig Operational Flying Training Unit) perform this role. these are old birds which aren’t really ideal for training young pilots.
    LCA would be perfect for this role.

    http://armedforces.nic.in/airforce/moftu.htm

    Role

    The primary role of the unit is to impart Stage III operational flying training to pilots inducted into the fighter stream.

    Rahul M
    Participant

    Thats 180 LCAs for the IAF alone (40 MK-I and 140 MK-II).

    + 20 or more trainers. I think the chances of an additional couple of sqn LIFT LCA are bright as well.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (X) – Flamers NOT Welcome at all #2425927
    Rahul M
    Participant

    They rescheduled the first first flight many times from 2007/2008. Later it was decided to fly by early 2009. Around Sep/Oct there were some news that it will fly by Nov/Dec. Then in between Dec 26 to Dec 29! But its almost 2010 now. Actually when the project was started, it was scheduled to fly around 2005. 🙂

    hey, please don’t give me that 2005 business, that is yet another case of ignorant journos pulling out dates from their wazoos. GOI takes an inordinate amount of time to sanction funding, without the money, there is no project.

    for the LCH, this was when funding was sanctioned :
    be warned though, this article was written at a time when ajai shukla couldn’t see anything good with desi projects much like his DDM compatriots today ! what a long way he has come !
    http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/ajai-shuklahealing-naturefailure/274493/

    Dominating the HAL stand was a hastily constructed scale model of the planned Light Combat Helicopter (LCH). Other than that, the LCH actually exists only on a government document dated October 2006, sanctioning HAL vast sums of money for its development.

    so the LCH was supposed to fly 1 year before the project was sanctioned ? wow ! 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 308 total)