Garry,

Thanks a bunch. Now to go digging!:)

Ukranina missile is most likely be AA-10EP. It is longer range and twice heavier missile as compared to darter and SD-10. So they are not in the same category.

Here we go again….

Prove it that i have brought any article from fan site?

LOL. All your claims from other Pak sites are holy huh? Gimme a break! :rolleyes:

qAnd i havent boosted about FC-1 anywhere and FC-1 does not need any boosting as it is already gaining quite attraction with well known character.

What tosh! As if people here have forgotten your bilge about a FC1 being more than equal to a Su30MKI. :p
Boosting the FC1 is one thing. Tying it to high hopes and routinely blathering another.

and comparing it to LCA. Give me a break. This is from aviation week about radar offering for PAF both West and Russia is there. So where is the basis of your BS claim that no one is selling radar.

Theres an old sayin -Show me the money! For all your hot air and articles- we have the PAF ACM repeatedly claiming that the PAF cant get western technology and has hence sought recourse in China.

IOW, the PAF is yet to decide on anything because of a paucity of suppliers.
And then we have the usual “Gimme gimme gimme ” sessions over F16’s..why not buy those?:p

So much for your western equipped this and Russian that nonsense.

As usual Brute the chimpanzee is bringing some fan articles which are based on Indian boosting of LCA capabilities. there is no evidence of Gripen radar for LCA.

As compared to Star49 the Donkey, bringing out fan articles based on Pakistani boosting of the FC1? 😉
For now, there is no evidence of any radar type being confirmed for the PAF…seems they want a lot, but noones willing to sell it to them.

why? its so obvious. Is India willing to import 250 GE F404 engines along with 250 imported radar sets to make it Indiangenous. And why bother importing things for LCA when superior Mirage is available much earlier with greater payload and hard points.

Ah I suppose you were hiding under the desk when ADA ordered “250 engines and radars” I suppose. Oh wait- you can peer inside peoples heads and see what goes on.
And the correct, spelling is “indigenous”, twit. If you want to troll do it elsewhere.

Yes good for you, But I’d not prefer that if I’m facing an enemy 8 times my size and only report it to the elite of the government. Everyone has there own way of thinking.

Elite of the Government? Heh, I can call up the attrition stats anytime. Guess that makes me the El Head Honcho el Inde …the stats are open to all.
Whatever be the claimed reasons, its clear that India is open about its attirition whilst unnamed country facing 8x,1.5x,200X whatever neighbour, is not.

so again Isrealis trying to pull in India…..i say no need for barak Kashtan and if possible Plama wud be fine…rather concentrate on Shtil VLS and make a longer version of the same like the USN SM series thats wud help in the future

Good for them. Cooperative development is the name of the game.

Gents,

Bench testing is merely the beginning of a long and arduous process. Dont expect an AESA for the PAK FA to come quick. I have no doubts that they can do it, but they will take some time.

Blackcat,

In MiG29’s with AESA? Not anytime soon. IN MIg29’s with mini Bars? Very probable.

Good news- NIIP and Phaza ARE both working on the next gen AESA for the PAK FA. Combined. Positive and encouraging – best use of resources and preventing duplication of effort. As with the Bars, it might be that India chips in as well- esp since it might be a consortium member.

Garry,

Which radars are those? All the ones I am aware of – even for the S300/400 for eg- are passive ones. Note I am referring to inservice mature systems, not developmental prototypes.

BTW, I did mean a/c AESA systems when I typed out my initial remark.

Cheers,
Nitin