The fighter’s combat survivability has been improved with the installation of a modern electronic warfare suite.
Any idea of what this is? Paul, Vympel?
Thanks
Yes, overwing pylons were shown on a mockup at Farnborough 1974.
They were offered as an option on the Jaguar S International.
It is possible that Indian companies might have been consulted pre-Gulf War, if time was tight. This doesn’t mean that the Indians “invented” overwing pylons, but they were the only people with experience in using and integrating missiles with these pylons.
Exactly what Harry and I have been pointing out.
Nitin
This is getting silly, I have proved my point, the Omanis got their Jags in 1977 with the rails orginally fitted, now you are trying to discredit the source I am using, why would anyone fib about such a minor thing.
Utter nonsense.
You didnt even read your own link. It merely states that the Omanis got Jags in 1977, and that Omani Jags had overwing rails as well, as they were Jag Internationals- not mentioning when what happened.
Do I need to quote the entire passage again or will you continue with your needless fudging?
The Magics were first integrated in 1981 and the Omanis were flying around with empty rails for no good reason. Why?
Becuase Yasser desparately wishes that they were. Such beautiful logic confounds me.
Anyway, I am tired of trying to prove facts to people who only want to beleive things that suite them and their nationalist agendas, it wont be long until people will find lost of sources and indeed pix of Jags with overiwng missiles prior to 1980 and the Jags entry to Indian service, I really wonder what your reaction will be then……
Thats exactly the point. This is not a thread for you to trot your usual nationalistic India phobic harangue.
Better people than you will surely find some evidence of *something* and the debate will grow. But as far as you are considered , I am yet to see any evidence brought forth by you apart from a googled link!
Harry
The first batch were Jag Internationals delivered with rails to use the magic, yes later they got some RAF ones, but the FIRST OMANI JAG INTERNATIONALS WERE DELIVERED WITH OVERWING RAILS IN 1977Now ad as many smiles as you want, but the above are facts and will not change, India may have odnw some integration work I dont know about that and cannot deny it, but lets not pretend they were the first
Stop getting hysterical and state which link states that Oman got overwing rail EQUIPPED Jags *in* 1977. Sheesh.
The Magics could have been retrofitted much later.
Oh, lest I forget- 😀
Ok the story thus far:
1968: Jag first flew
1973: Enter French AF service
197?: Enter RAF service?
1975: Jags ‘displayed’ with overwing pylon (???)
1979: Jags come to India (no mention of any overwing pylon)
1980-81: No.14 becames ops , followed by No.5 in 81. Not clear if ASTE undertakes Overwing mod for Magic as pre-DARIN or DARIN. DARIN test a/c used to clear Magic 2’s as well
1981: DARIN starts on the IAF Jags
1982-1985: DARIN makes its first flight, gets IOC and FOC.
1991: RAF inducts overwing pylon for its fleet of Jag to carry the Sidewinder.
If the above is correct, all you need to do is state when and who flew the first overwing AAM and disprove that ASTE had any hand in it. Easy as pie.
See above.
” All Omani Jaguars were all painted in a brown / sand desert camouflage scheme. Overwing launch rails were originally fitted, at least to the single-seaters, for carriage of the Matra Magic AAM, but for some obscure reason the Omanis decided to switch to carrying AIM-9P Sidewinders on the outboard underwing pylons. Oman actually assigned its Jaguars an air-defense role. ”
Happy!? Or let me guess, your ASTE developed the Omani Jags as well!? 😉
Omans Jags were delivered in 1977, and they were using launch rails, so lets end this stupid debate here and now, as frankly lots of users here would get more credit if they just admited they may be wrong and for once their countries claims are wrong, there is no shame in it….
Truly silly. Does the link- by an amateur to boot- mention when the Omanis got their Magics on overwing rails?
The Magics were validated in 1981.
Nitin
Your fudging and confusing things for no reason, it clearly states that the Jaguar International was offered by SEPECAT with overwing rails, this was in the mid 70s. So please let me know of ANY Indian involvment with the initial development of these rails. There is none. Are you now denying that the Jaguar International was offered with overwing missile rails?
Typical. All you can bring up is an amateurs report which makes no mention of the rails and missile integration being done in 1975, and you have the idiocy to accuse others of fudging.
If you have no primary sources to work with, I suggest you retire and let more informed folks like Frank, Paul etc discuss the issue.
Since overwing rails could only host AAM’s and the Magic 2’s appeared in 1981 what does that tell you? Alas, that requires you to look beyond your silly flaming.
Wall paintings? Tipu Sultan imported rockets from China to use as ad-hoc MBRLs against the British. This is a well known fact.
Tipu made his own rockets- they were iron cased and were better than what the Europeans did..but the true pioneers appear to be the Marathas, (or the founding fathers / ancestors of todays Maharahstra in the Indian republic).
Source: The History of Indian Rocketry, 30th Nov 1991.
By Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam
(Director Defence Research & Development Laboratory Hydaerabad, India)
Many such researchers have to spring up in our Universities as well. Soon, I learnt that two of the war rockets captured by British at Srirangapatana have been displayed in the Museum of Artillery at Woolwich in London. o*ne of my missions during my visit to Europe in 1980 was to study this rocket. Dr.VR.Gowarkar and I visited the museum. It was a great thrill especially for Rocket technologists like us, to see an Indian innovation in a foreign soil well preserved and with facts not distorted.
Under the heading “India’s War Rocket”, the following details are recorded in the Woolwhich museum London. The motor casing of this rocket is made of steel with multi nozzle holes with the sword blade as the warhead. The propellant used was packed gunpowder. Weight of the rocket is about 2kg. With about 1kg of propellant. 50mm in dia about 250mm length, the range performance is reported 900mts to 1.5 km. Our designers analyzed and confirmed their performance. What a simple and elegant design effectively used in war!
The text above is an sourced from the homage paid to Tipu Sultan by, Dr. Abdul Kalam during the Hazrath Tipu Sultan Shaheed Memorial Lecture organised by the Al-Ameen Educational Society Bangalore o*n 30th Nov 1991.
Dr Kalam is currently the President of India.
and…
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/SPACE/space-history1.html
Thereafter from 1750 AD -1799 Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan[1] (Sultan of Mysore, in South India) perfected rocket’s use for military purposes, very effectively using it in war against British colonial armies. Tipu Sultan had 27 brigades (called Kushoons) and each brigade had a company of rocket men called Jourks. In the Second Anglo-Mysore war, at the Battle of Pollilur (10 September 1780), Hyder and Tipu achieved a grand victory, the contributory cause being that one of the British ammunition tambrils was set on fire by Mysorean rockets.
At the Battle of Seringapatam in 1792, Indian soldiers launched a huge barrage of rockets against British troops, followed by an assault of 36,000 men. Although the Indian rockets were primitive by modern standards, their sheer numbers, noise and brilliance were said to have been quite effective at disorienting British soldiers. During the night, the rockets were often seen as blue lights bursting in the air. Since Indian forces were able to launch these bursting rockets from in front of and behind British lines, they were a tremendous tool for throwing the British off guard. The bursting rockets were usually followed by a deadly shower of rockets aimed directly at the soldiers. Some of these rockets passed from the front of the British columns to the rear, inflicting injury and death as they passed. Sharp bamboo was typically affixed to the rockets, which were designed to bounce along the ground to produce maximum damage[2]. Two of the rockets fired by Indian troops in 1792 war are on display at the Royal Artillery Museum in London[3].
Later at the battle of Srirangapattana (4’th Anglo-Mysore war) April 1799, British forces lead by Col Arthur Wellesley (Duke of Wellington) ran away from battlefield when attacked by rockets and musket fire of Tipu Sultan’s army. Unlike contemporary rockets whose combustion chamber was made of wood (bamboo), Tipu’s rockets weighing between 2.2 to 5.5 kg used iron cylinder casing that allowed greater pressure, thrust & range (1.5 to 2.5 Km)[4] .
The British were greatly impressed by the Mysorean rockets using iron tubes. At the end of war more then 700 rockets and sub systems of 900 rockets were captured and sent to England. William Congreve thoroughly examined the Indian specimens to reverse engineer and making its copies that were later used successfully in naval attack on Boulogne(1806)[5], siege of Copenhagen(1807)[6] and also against fort Washington(New York) during America independence war,that is recounted as, “rockets’ red glare” in U.S. National Anthem “The Star Spangled Banner”[7].
INDIAN TROOPS ROUT BRITISH. The English confrontation with Indian rockets came in 1780 at the Battle of Guntur. The closely massed, normally unflinching British troops broke and ran when the Indian Army laid down a rocket barrage in their midst. http://history.msfc.nasa.gov/rocketry/11.html
http://www.nationalgalleries.org.uk/tipu/tipu312.htm
It was, however, the rocket which was Tipu’s deadliest missile, ‘a weapon hitherto held almost in derision,’ wrote Wilks, ‘because seen in small numbers it is easily avoided.’ These ‘weapons of fire’ are mentioned in the Vedic hymns and in the Ramayana (c.300BC) and have a long tradition in India. Rockets could be of various sizes, but the general design was an iron tube about 8″ long and 1½ – 3″ diameter, closed at one end and strapped to a shaft of bamboo about 4ft. long. The cylinder was filled with combustible material and some powder – a large rocket, carrying about one pound of powder could travel some 1,000 yards. A watercolour by Robert Home painted during the Third Mysore War, shows one of Tipu’s rocket men in his ‘tyger jacket’ bending to pick up just such a missile. Although rockets existed also in Europe, they were not iron cased, and their range was far less than that of their oriental counterparts. Indeed, it was a study of the Mahrattas’ use of the rocket which eventually led to the publication of ‘A Concise Account of the Origin and Progress of the Rocket System’, published in 1804 by William Congreve, son of the Commander of the Royal Arsenal at Woolwich, London.
Rockets had already been used against the British in 1755, and at Plassey in 1757, but it was at the Battle of Panipat (1761) , against the Marathas, when the British first experienced the truly formidable power of massed rockets – some 2,000 fired simultaneously. Tipu’s own military manual, ‘Fathul Mujahidin’, copies of which were distrubuted to all his officers, gives 200 rocketmen in each Mysorean cushoon, and a total of 16 cushoons of infantry (Lieut. Bushby, describing Tipu’s infantry, intimates that 24 cushoons may have been nearer the total).Rocket men were trained to assess the parabolic curve of the rocket’s flight and vary the angle of dispatch, depending on the diameter of the cylinder and the distance from the target. For multiple launching, Tipu created his own ‘rocket organ’, capable of launching 5-10 rockets at once – as used at the siege of Honore (1784) . 600 ‘engines of iron for throwing rockets’ were found at Seringapatam in 1799, together with 700 serviceable and 9,000 empty rockets. Some of these had iron points or steel blades bound to the bamboo, to inflict greater damage, and some of Haidar’s rockets had pierced cylinders, so that the wind could catch the burning flame, and the passing rocket would then act like an incendiary. Tara-mandalpet or ‘Galaxy Bazaar’ was thus an appropriate name for the areas of towns where rockets and fireworks were manufactured.
Beatson refers to ‘a dreadful explosion’ caused on 2nd May, when a shot from one of the British batteries struck a magazine of rockets within the fort at Seringapatam. The explosion is recorded in one of Beatson’s illustrations for his account of the final Mysore War: a towering cloud of black smoke, with cascades of exploding white light, rising from behind the battlements. The aquatint process used for the illustration dramatically captured Beatson’s ‘View of the North West Front of Seringapatam, Shewing the Approaches of the Batteries, the Breach, and the explosion of the Rocket magazine.’
For those, like Baird, who had fought at Pollilur nineteen years earlier, there must have been a grim memory of a similar situation in reverse: the havoc wrought by one of Tipu’s missiles and the explosion of the British ammunition tumbrils.
Heh, should have known Bangalore would be involved somehow. 😀
http://www.bangalorebest.com/discoverbangalore/sightseeing/TimeLine/tiger.asp
As his main aim was to strengthen his military power and oust the British out of country, he founded a huge ordinance factory at Devanahalli. At Bangalore, rockets were manufactured and stored at Taramandalpet (Kalasipalya today). The armoury still exists next to Bangalore Medical College.
Pak Thunder,
And you folks dont even read your own links…sigh…
Regarding the RAF:
Several improvements were added in 1990, including upgrade of the Marconi RWR to Sky Guardian 200 standard, a much smarter piece of gear with a better threat-warning display; improvements in IFF and radio fit; and addition of an overwing launch rail on top of each wing for carriage of Sidewinder AAMs. The overwing launch rail was designed for the “Jaguar International” export variant, discussed in a later section, and allowed carriage of AAMs without sacrificing heavy underwing stores.
That should settle the issue of when the RAF got the overwing rails for the time being, unless someone gets a better source.
It makes *no* claim about when overwing rails APPEARED on the Jaguar or were validated, merely notes that they did come about and were adopted by everyone.
Your claim of it being 1975 is again a misreading as the article makes no note of them appearing in 1975 itself.
As regards not mentioning ASTE, cant blame Greg Goebel- he did the best he could and notes:
India was by far the most enthusiastic foreign user, and the relatively complicated history of the Jaguar in Indian service is discussed separately in the following section.
And..
Local Indian production of the Jaguar is something of a confusing and tedious topic
Hence, Group Captain Bhargava’s article remains the most comprehensive about the Jaguar in Indian service.
It would, given that he has access to ASTE being an ex test pilot and would get whatever information he wanted.
And that is perhaps why AFM took his piece.
It would be unfair to Goebel to compare his collation vis a vis what Bhargava could write on the Jag in Indian service.
BTW, it corroborates whatever Harry and I have pointed out:
The usual overwing munition was a Matra Magic AAM, though the Sidewinder was also qualified eventually. Although it might seem that overwing launch would have led to problems with stores separation, it apparently was no big deal.
Note that the Overwing Pylons could only be used for AAMs.
The first AAM was the Magic 2
Then came the Sidewinder
We know from the ASTE article that the validation trials were done at ASTE using Magic 2’s in 1981.
That pretty much settles the issue. The others would have adopted it subsequently.
Sepecat may have intended for the Jag to have overwing pylons earlier, but ASTE was involved in the project and the DARIN test aircraft was used for the Magic trials.
BTW, this is what the Comptroller and Auditor General of India says about the “tailoring” of the Jaguar International to local desires in case you are still wondering whether local involvement was there or not… For eg the Nav subsystem:
“Three foreign vendors were chosen for development, of DARIN sub-systems. Besides, a host of Indian agencies were also associated with the development programme. As per the milestones identified for achieving….”
etcetc.
The latest product to be productionised will be “Cadimium Zinc Telluride” (CZT) crystals developed at SSPL, New Delhi for militarily strategic applications in Night vision equipment, Focal Point Arrays etc. The facility is coming up at CEL and production is expected to commence in September 2001.
Exactly my point. :confused: This number is however quoted on the defense news website as well as other DDM. $9 Bn is way too much money to spend on 126 aircraft, especially for India which can put it to more productive use elsewhwere.
Another story that is floating around is that the Euro’s (french) government have denied TOT for the thales seeker on Nag. (Again same website). Interesting considering that they are in play for 126 + 10 Mirage sales.
PC , the problem with DDM is that they are DDM.
Thats why we blokes call them the Desi Dork Media after all.
The internet is a vast echo chamber- within minutes you’ll find one erroneous report picked up and mirrored at various places!
The original reports- none of them, spoke of 9B$$- I almost dropped my coffee when I read that number!
Regarding the Nags seeker, the standard methodology employed by India and most other nations I’d wager is to import select subsystems whilst a local one gets ready. This enables us to validate the entire system without having a bottleneck develop and slow down the project. Also, France hardly holds all the cards, I may point out that the Israelis make IIR seekers as well.
This is a post I made elsewhere- these refer to the Nags local seeker which is now apparently ready.
The fabrication facility has been running for some time now and apparently they worked out the kinks and have brought it forth for integration.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2004/02/06/stories/2004020601500900.htm
2India’s missile programme is spurring industries’ — Dr V. K. Saraswat, Director, Research Centre Imarat
M. Somasekhar
Feb 06, 2004
The RCI has developed these versions and is ready for tests. For example in Nag, the Focal Plain Array device and an all weather day and night IR seeker have been developed by RCI and the Solid State Physics Laboratory (SSPL), New Delhi.
http://www.blonnet.com/businessline/2000/09/06/stories/040667sh.htm
Quote:Defence labs ‘crystallise’ strategic materials
M. Somasekhar
CRYSTALS grown from cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe) are known to have important applications. They can form the base material for developing infra-red devices that help in providing night vision as well as in the fabrication of solar cells.
Night vision in gadgets range from the simple goggles that help a person see in the dark to onboard cameras in aircraft which can scan a larger terrain to spot out enemies or militants or do surveillance. The more strategic use can be equipping missiles with this night vision in the guidance system, so that they can home-in on targets round the clock.
The CdZnTe crystals are deployed in advanced infra-red (IR) detector systems such as focal plane array (FPA), which are an integral part of the guidance system in missiles. Among the missiles developed by India, the anti-tank version called `Nag’ system has been equipped with a night vision feature.
The technology to make these crystals grow and formulate substrates that could form the base material for the IR sensors is challenging and difficult. It is the exclusive preserve of a handful of advanced nations. India has been depending on limited import of this strategic material at exorbitant cost. However, post Pokhran-1998, export to India has been completely banned by the US and other industrialised countries.
Unlike silicon or gallium arsenide, it is difficult to grow large-size single crystals of CdZnTe due to its inherent properties such as low thermal conductivity, weak bonding and high ionicity.
Scientists at the Solid State Physics Laboratory (SSPL), under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) in New Delhi, have successfully developed the process to grow device quality CdZnTe crystals at the laboratory scale. Crystals up to the size of 55 mm diameter have been grown.
SSPL has recently joined hands with the public sector Central Electronics Laboratory (CEL), Shahibabad, to produce the material to meet the country’s missile programme as well as other strategic applications.
The CEL is setting up a fabrication centre in its campus with a funding of Rs. 4.5 crores provided by the SSPL. The facility is expected to start rolling out device quality crystals by April 2001, according to Mr. Mylar Rao, CMD, CEL.
Thanks, could you elaborate more? Any pics?
Were the pylons displayed at a show – iow, were they mockups of how Sepecat wanted things to be, or had they already been validated by then?
It could well be that Sepecat / BAe /ASTE validated the pylons etc on the previously mentioned Jag with the DARIN. That would account for the confusion and the mirroring accounts by the different agencies involved in the program.
All the best,
Nitin
It was many years ago, but I remember reading somewhere that HAL’s involvement was solely as a contractor or consultant for retrofitting RAF Jags with the overwing missile installation setup. The reason for this was that the Indians had operational experience with this configuration on their Jags.
The concept/design was definitely not HAL’s, it was a BAE and SEPECAT design right from the start. HAL just executed the design on their production line and the IAF was the largest Jaguar operator with the overwing Magics in operational service.
It could not have been HAL’s design alone since HAL was merely the production agency. All the developments were carried out at the IIO and by a joint IAF/HAL/DRDO team which kept OEM’s in the loop.
Ok, now to correct the overwing pylon nonsense posted here…
According to WAPJ:
The overwing pylon was developped by SEPECAT for the Jaguar International.
It was cleared for the Magic II, in order to provide a self defense capability without compromising the combat load.Afterwards, it got cleared for the AIM-9, and the RAF then adopted it and used it in 1991.
I am afraid thats hardly conclusive. That sounds pretty generic and without details. As noted earlier, all product/ process improvements for the Jaguar were proprietary BAe property without IPR limitations and could be recognised as such, without mentioning the local contributors.
Do you have any cites from the OEM- namely British Aerospace or the others?
Please note, that the cites earlier are from those officers involved DIRECTLY with the ASTE, the Indian Air Force’s Aircraft and Systems Testing Establishment.
It was ASTE which was the nodal agency for developing IAF specific Jaguar improvements.
So are there any sources from the British/ French side which explicitly mention the timeline, weapons integration etc?
There are bound to be some?
Guys
Take it easy on the national insults, its getting boring.It was SEPECAT that integrated the missile, not HAL, if that upsets people then so be it, I frankly dont see the point of continuing this debate. Are people on this forum too lazy to research!?
If you would learn to read through the documents posted, you would realise that it was ASTE (NOT HAL, ASTE is an IAF establishment) and not SEPECAT that integrated the Magic 2 on the Jaguar. It can be very well argued that BAe was kept in the loop throughout as with the development of the DARIN and other India specific improvements to the Jaguar international and that has also been indicated above by Harry and I.
Apparently, its you who slacked off on the research and jumped to conclusions mate.