From what I understand the Typhoon, Rafale, F-16 Blk 60 and F-15/F-22 were all on the same side.
Red air was provided by M2K (UAE and France)
AFAIK all the UH-1s/212s are operated by 8 Sqn, which is based at KAAB/Marka alongside 7 Sqn.
Sorry to raise this again, but does anyone know when the Rafales adopted ‘113’ (air base) codes? Was it when EC 1/91 was formed?
Thanks
Nice to see an EC 1/91 jet at Paris.
A quick question (I’m sure it’s been mentioned elsewhere but I’m not going back through all that lot) – When did the aircraft codes change to ‘113-xx’?
Cheers
PS I have absolutely no preference for Rafale or Typhoon, but I can confirm what Jacko says about the Czech Gripens!
Someone at BAE told me it had changed, but then they didn’t know what it had changed to, so maybe it hasn’t changed at all!
Someone at BAE told me it had changed, but then they didn’t know what it had changed to, so maybe it hasn’t changed at all!
😎
SUAVe is called something else these days
😎
SUAVe is called something else these days
It’s ‘superseded’
HTH
It’s ‘superseded’
HTH
….. The reports on the JH-7 and the Victor are especially interesting …..
About the Victor feature …..
Neither pics of the cockpit or the working stations nor of the free fall nuclear weapons ….. 🙁
But a nice pic of the Red Neck aircraft, and a Mk 1 carrying Blue Steel
the role of Raven which apparentlly was much more about complexe flight control systems for the benefit of the others…
That was certainly a factor, although there was a lot more to it than that. I expect that the roles of Corax and Raven, and the relative importance of the programmes, MAY become more evident at some point in the future….
NOAS
Bear in mind that the Machrihanish flight was the first autonomous flight in UK airspace.
HERTI and Raven had already been flying around autonomously for some time in AUSTRALIA.
SHARC was certainly the first to fly autonomously IN Europe, but whether it was the first European UAV to fly autonomously is another matter …
(I do know the answer, BTW!!!)
Not too sure if the Norway decision will impinge too much on the Gripen offer in Switzerland as it is the C/D on offer rather than NG. That would make the Gripen bid surely a lot cheaper than the other two, and also be a better-suited ‘F-5 replacement’ if that is what they want.
A Jacko points out, it depends on whether the Swiss want a ‘simple’ A-G capability or something a bit meatier – certainly Gripen is further up the curve if all they want is a reliable laser-bomber, plus it offers a more mature recce capability.
FWIW, Eurofighter are certainly ‘bigging up’ the Typhoon’s performance in the Swiss case – very short intercept reaction times and tight-turning capability in the mountain valleys ….
Fair points PII and JB – I expect the MDS came after the purchases.
Incidentally, the 318th SOS stood up with four U-28As at Cannon on 16 May.